Go back
Misogyny no longer exists!

Misogyny no longer exists!

Debates

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
18 Jul 22

According to our leftist democrat friends (Shav, Kev, Zahloony, etc etc ) gender is a social construct and doesn't actually exist.

So by default, Misogyny can't exist.

Thanks guys! πŸ˜‰

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
According to our leftist democrat friends (Shav, Kev, Zahloony, etc etc ) gender is a social construct and doesn't actually exist.

So by default, Misogyny can't exist.

Thanks guys! πŸ˜‰
Hardly true; someone like you who believes differently can still be, and is, a misogynist.

"Race" in humans has been accepted by science to be a mere social construct but there are still racists like yourself because you really believe that minor evolutionary physical adaptations can actually lead to one "race" being inherently superior and/or inferior to another. It's a stupid thing to believe but that doesn't stop fools like you, Mott, JJ and others from doing so.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
18 Jul 22
2 edits

@no1marauder

So Asians being better at math and Africans being better runners is just coincidence?
Another social construct?

If race doesn't exist then Racism can't exist. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
@no1marauder

So Asians being better at math and Africans being better runners is just coincidence?
Another social construct?

If race doesn't exist then Racism can't exist. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
I cleared it up for you, but you were too stupid to understand what I said.

That's not surprising; racism is a stupid belief system so it can be expected that those who believe in it are typically of low intelligence like yourself.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
According to our leftist democrat friends (Shav, Kev, Zahloony, etc etc ) gender is a social construct and doesn't actually exist.

So by default, Misogyny can't exist.

Thanks guys! πŸ˜‰
Right, but social ineptitude still does, and you got it in spades.

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
18 Jul 22
1 edit

@no1marauder said
I cleared it up for you, but you were too stupid to understand what I said.

That's not surprising; racism is a stupid belief system so it can be expected that those who believe in it are typically of low intelligence like yourself.
I cleared it up for you, but you were too stupid to understand what I said.


Trying hard not to giggle.... 😏

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
According to our leftist democrat friends (Shav, Kev, Zahloony, etc etc ) gender is a social construct and doesn't actually exist.

So by default, Misogyny can't exist.

Thanks guys! πŸ˜‰
I think you’ll find most of those leftists do say that gender exists.

And no matter if you do or don’t misogyny is directed at what the perpetrator interprets as female in any case (whether gender or biological sex or both).

So, it’s not often you’re right, but you’re wrong again.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
18 Jul 22

@shavixmir

Hahaa you admitted i was right... sometimes πŸ€—

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
18 Jul 22

Seriously though...No gender No Misogyny.

I like this new liberal world πŸ€”

JJ Adams

Joined
23 Feb 22
Moves
1798
Clock
18 Jul 22

If race is a social construct, then why can race be determined through DNA tests?
Not to mention how different the races LOOK from each other.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
If race doesn't exist then Racism can't exist. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
If some people walk around with purple hats and everyone else discriminates against those people:

1. There's no real fundamental difference between the purple hatters and everyone else;

BUT

2. The purple hatters can certainly be discriminated against.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Jul 22

@jj-adams said
If race is a social construct, then why can race be determined through DNA tests?
Not to mention how different the races LOOK from each other.
It can't:

"BIOLOGICAL RACE has been defined by combinations of physical
features, geographic ancestry, frequencies of genes (alleles) and evolutionary lineages. Biological races exist within
some species. This is why we know they do not exist within our species, modern humans."

" Indeed, all modern humans living today are descended from people who once lived in East Africa. (The oldest modern human fossils come from Omo Kibish in Ethiopia.) Humans did
not begin to populate the rest of the world until about 60,000 years ago. Some of the first recorded civilizations
were located in Ethiopia (prior to 3,000 B.C.E.) and then moved up the Blue Nile to modern-day Egypt. Thus many of the
biological traits not found in sub-Saharan Africans are relatively new; fair skin and the blue-eye allele are—at most—
6,000 years old.
Finally this also means that when most people think of biological ancestry, they are really envisioning recent ancestry relative to our species’ existence (within the last 50,000
years or so)."

"Have you ever heard the term “genetic drift”? This refers to chance events that alter gene frequencies in populations. This happened when human groups migrated out of Africa
at different times and in different directions. Members of a given group carried a unique subset of all human
genetic variation with them. For all these reasons, there is no single physical trait or gene that can be used to unambiguously assign people to racial groups."

" Skin color variation is associated with solar intensity, and thus all
populations with tropical ancestry have darker skin than those whose recent ancestry is from the temperate and arctic zones. Solomon Islanders, for example, have physical traits very similar to
sub-Saharan Africans, yet these Pacific Islanders are much further apart on overall gene frequency (the percentage
of genes of a given type) from sub-Saharan Africans than from Europeans.
"

"Physical factors fail to correctly cluster humans and thus cannot be used to assign people to racial groups—a fact
scientists have known since the 1940s!
"

https://www.learningforjustice.org/sites/default/files/general/Race%20does%20not%20equal%20DNA%20-%20TT50.pdf

Science that you should have learned in HS (if you ever made it that far).

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
18 Jul 22

@no1marauder said
It can't:

"BIOLOGICAL RACE has been defined by combinations of physical
features, geographic ancestry, frequencies of genes (alleles) and evolutionary lineages. Biological races exist within
some species. This is why we know they do not exist within our species, modern humans."

" Indeed, [b]all modern humans living today are descended from people who once l ...[text shortened]... %20DNA%20-%20TT50.pdf

Science that you should have learned in HS (if you ever made it that far).
Oh, I very much doubt he’s been to school at all.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
18 Jul 22
1 edit

@no1marauder

So a DNA sample will never say what "race" the DNA comes from?

Nevermind...it can't.

It can tell gender though πŸ˜‰

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
18 Jul 22

@beowulf said
@no1marauder

So a DNA sample will never say what "race" the DNA comes from?

Nevermind...it can't.

It can tell gender though πŸ˜‰
No it can’t. It can tell you biological sex.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.