19 Mar 22
@metal-brain saidYou have a lot of guts to bring up propaganda warping someone. You believe every piece of anti-American, anti-Ukraine, anti-science propaganda you can find.
Yet you still want to support policies that will start a nuclear war.
You must be so excited. Ready to move in a basement for months until you can live through the radiation fallout for about a year until you die of cancer are you?
Propaganda has you so warped you want a no fly zone. Right?
19 Mar 22
@suzianne saidStill denying neo nazis are in the Ukraine government? Do you believe Lara Logan?
You have a lot of guts to bring up propaganda warping someone. You believe every piece of anti-American, anti-Ukraine, anti-science propaganda you can find.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-bombshell-truth/5774534
19 Mar 22
@metal-brain saidNo, I don't believe a damned thing on that conspiracy-theory website.
Still denying neo nazis are in the Ukraine government? Do you believe Lara Logan?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-bombshell-truth/5774534
@metal-brain saidHahaha 😱 I hope they are lot more effective than their conventional forces.
Russia has the first strike advantage. The megalomaniacs in the west should remember that.
https://endoftheamericandream.com/most-americans-dont-know-about-the-new-nuclear-weapons-russia-has-developed-since-the-end-of-the-cold-war/
Do you think you know what sort of weaponry your governments been developing out there in the desert.
Hey halfwit your country is the embarrassing halfwit inbred 2nd cousin in the European family and it’s not getting invited to any more weddings.
19 Mar 22
@metal-brain saidAvailable is no use idiot how long do you think a nuclear exchange is going to last?
Count the available nukes too. Add them up like I did earlier in this thread.
You do realise every nation you mention could cut its nuclear forces by 2 thirds and could still wipe Russia off the map. And you haven’t taken into consideration the number of nations Russia will have to spread it’s nukes around whilst the three nuke holding nato countries will only be targeting Russia.
20 Mar 22
@kevcvs57 saidDid I strike a nerve?
Available is no use idiot how long do you think a nuclear exchange is going to last?
You do realise every nation you mention could cut its nuclear forces by 2 thirds and could still wipe Russia off the map. And you haven’t taken into consideration the number of nations Russia will have to spread it’s nukes around whilst the three nuke holding nato countries will only be targeting Russia.
https://endoftheamericandream.com/most-americans-dont-know-about-the-new-nuclear-weapons-russia-has-developed-since-the-end-of-the-cold-war/
Count nukes anyway you want to. Russia is far from the weak nation you imply. That is why you are so angry. Reality doesn't sit well with you.
20 Mar 22
@kevcvs57 saidUh… the number of nations is 3.
Available is no use idiot how long do you think a nuclear exchange is going to last?
You do realise every nation you mention could cut its nuclear forces by 2 thirds and could still wipe Russia off the map. And you haven’t taken into consideration the number of nations Russia will have to spread it’s nukes around whilst the three nuke holding nato countries will only be targeting Russia.
France, England and the US.
So, that’s about 50 nukes against Britain, 50 nukes against France. 2000 nukes against the US. And nearly 4000 nukes just in case one’s a dud.
It’s not a gamble anyone is going to take.
@metal-brain saidLara Logan? The fascist apologist who claimed Antifa leaves stacks of bricks lying around just in case there is a handy riot, and who compared Fauci to Mengele?
Still denying neo nazis are in the Ukraine government? Do you believe Lara Logan?
No, I don't think anything she claims is worth considering. But it doesn't surprise me that you trust someone like that.
@metal-brain saidHahaha
Russia has the first strike advantage. The megalomaniacs in the west should remember that.
https://endoftheamericandream.com/most-americans-dont-know-about-the-new-nuclear-weapons-russia-has-developed-since-the-end-of-the-cold-war/
@shavixmir saidLol you think they can afford to leave the other European NATO members unscathed so they can pick over the rubble that was once Russia.
Uh… the number of nations is 3.
France, England and the US.
So, that’s about 50 nukes against Britain, 50 nukes against France. 2000 nukes against the US. And nearly 4000 nukes just in case one’s a dud.
It’s not a gamble anyone is going to take.
I hope your right because that will leave the other 27 democracies standing.
@kevcvs57 saidThat attitude is why Harry Windsor decided to become Californian.
Hahaha 😱 I hope they are lot more effective than their conventional forces.
Do you think you know what sort of weaponry your governments been developing out there in the desert.
Hey halfwit your country is the embarrassing halfwit inbred 2nd cousin in the European family and it’s not getting invited to any more weddings.
@kevcvs57 saidYou really think that after a full nuclear exchange between the West and Russia there's going to be democracies "unscathed"?
Lol you think they can afford to leave the other European NATO members unscathed so they can pick over the rubble that was once Russia.
I hope your right because that will leave the other 27 democracies standing.
You really are dangerously deluded.
@athousandyoung saidAww Shucks do you think so, really 👍
That attitude is why Harry Windsor decided to become Californian.