22 Apr 22
@Metal-Brain
We will see just how deranged your god Putin is.
You seem to think it is ok for Putin to actually launch nukes against a country that has none just to win his embarrassing war, Putin is actually in trouble with his own sidekicks and I would not be surprised to hear about a coup overthrowing HIM which would save the world from the Nukes Putin obviously has planned. And a TRAITOR like you admires him and his war. I don't know which dude I hate more, Putin or YOU.
22 Apr 22
@sonhouse saidYou want to keep poking the big bear. Are you stupid?
@Metal-Brain
We will see just how deranged your god Putin is.
You seem to think it is ok for Putin to actually launch nukes against a country that has none just to win his embarrassing war, Putin is actually in trouble with his own sidekicks and I would not be surprised to hear about a coup overthrowing HIM which would save the world from the Nukes Putin obviously has pla ...[text shortened]... And a TRAITOR like you admires him and his war. I don't know which dude I hate more, Putin or YOU.
Think about that while you are in a basement crapping in a bucket. Think about how I warned you and you ignored good advice. Stop poking the nuclear armed bear!
28 Apr 22
He is giving fair warning.
Do NOT say you you were not warned.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-news-russia-warns-nuclear-world-war-if-west-keeps-sending-weapons/
Just remember when you see a nuclear blast standing in front of a window that a shock wave is on the way and you do not want broken glass in your eyes. Duck and cover. Then find a basement to live in for a few days before the fallout.
29 Apr 22
@metal-brain said😱😱Oooooh, calm down dear its just diplomacy Putin style.
He is giving fair warning.
Do NOT say you you were not warned.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-news-russia-warns-nuclear-world-war-if-west-keeps-sending-weapons/
Just remember when you see a nuclear blast standing in front of a window that a shock wave is on the way and you do not want broken glass in your eyes. Duck and cover. Then find a basement to live in for a few days before the fallout.
If we let him use the threat of nukes to rape and murder his way to the polish border why would he stop there?
30 Apr 22
@kevcvs57 saidWhy are you assuming he will not consider a first strike?
😱😱Oooooh, calm down dear its just diplomacy Putin style.
If we let him use the threat of nukes to rape and murder his way to the polish border why would he stop there?
If a nuclear war is going to happen there is a great advantage to strike first. I don't think you have thought this through. Your entire logic is based on the assumption Russia will never use nukes.
Why do you assume that? Do you secretly think Putin is too ethical to use nukes?
30 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidNo there isn’t though because the nukes and command centres are in underground bunkers / silos or better yet under the sea in the hugeness of the oceans.
Why are you assuming he will not consider a first strike?
If a nuclear war is going to happen there is a great advantage to strike first. I don't think you have thought this through. Your entire logic is based on the assumption Russia will never use nukes.
Why do you assume that? Do you secretly think Putin is too ethical to use nukes?
The only first strike that might have worked would have been before the Russians developed their own nuclear weapons 🙄 but thankfully the immorality of that probably prevented it.
Why are you so intent on echoing and giving credence to the BS threats of a monster? It’s almost as if your working for the guy 😂
30 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidNo I think that someone in the room will be sane enough to put one through his napper, out of self preservation if nothing else.
Why are you assuming he will not consider a first strike?
If a nuclear war is going to happen there is a great advantage to strike first. I don't think you have thought this through. Your entire logic is based on the assumption Russia will never use nukes.
Why do you assume that? Do you secretly think Putin is too ethical to use nukes?
If you want to have an adult conversation about the potential use of nukes stick with the odds on him using tactical battlefield nukes if he can coral the Ukrainian army into a small enough area, which he may well be trying to do.
30 Apr 22
@kevcvs57 saidIf Russia is going to use one nuke they will use them all. There is no advantage to using one or 2 nukes when the other side might use all of theirs.
No I think that someone in the room will be sane enough to put one through his napper, out of self preservation if nothing else.
If you want to have an adult conversation about the potential use of nukes stick with the odds on him using tactical battlefield nukes if he can coral the Ukrainian army into a small enough area, which he may well be trying to do.
Your denial of a first strike advantage is absurd. If there was no advantage no nation would care how close nukes are to their nation, yet they clearly do. Did the USSR care when the USA put nukes in Turkey? Oh yeah! Did the USA care when the USSR gave the USA a taste of their own medicine and put nukes in Cuba? Oh yeah! Big time!
You know better. You just don't want to admit you are wrong so you deny reality instead. A nuclear first strike is a tremendous advantage if it is an all out nuclear attack. A tactical nuke or 2 just gives the other side a chance to strike first.
There will be no limited nuke use. It is all or nothing. This is not the 40s anymore.
30 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidAre you an effing simpleton having nukes close to your border is not great but it’s not anything like a game winner and you’ll find that those are tactical weapons not the nation killing inter continental bad boys.
If Russia is going to use one nuke they will use them all. There is no advantage to using one or 2 nukes when the other side might use all of theirs.
Your denial of a first strike advantage is absurd. If there was no advantage no nation would care how close nukes are to their nation, yet they clearly do. Did the USSR care when the USA put nukes in Turkey? Oh yeah! Did ...[text shortened]... ike first.
There will be no limited nuke use. It is all or nothing. This is not the 40s anymore.
Russia has had nukes close to NATOs eastern flank for years and both sides have submarine based nukes continuously at sea, we’ll probably never know how close they get to each other’s territory.
Mutually assured destruction is still the best defence against a nuclear war breaking out.
If Russia is able to dictate to the world how much support they can give to Ukraine by threatening nuclear war and that achieves their goal of erasing Ukraine the the NPT should be torn up and we should all get as many nukes as we can, the only moral rationale for non proliferation is that the nuclear states never use them or the threat of them against weaker non nuclear states.
@Metal-Brain
BTW, your god Putin has been seen several times slurring words, hanging onto his desk, walking wobbly, looks like he is in the last days of his life HOPEFULLY. Also, his inner circle of 'friends' are looking closely at replacing him with someone actually SANE.
If Putin is insane enough to start using nukes JUST TO WIN UKRAINE and WW3 starts up bigtime, if there are actual human survivors, when Earth becomes fully habitable again, the civilization that arises will undoubtedly be a better version of humanity than we have now.
@kevcvs57 saidMutually assured destruction is big fat myth spread by the anti nuclear movement. It is nothing short of a lie.
Are you an effing simpleton having nukes close to your border is not great but it’s not anything like a game winner and you’ll find that those are tactical weapons not the nation killing inter continental bad boys.
Russia has had nukes close to NATOs eastern flank for years and both sides have submarine based nukes continuously at sea, we’ll probably never know how close th ...[text shortened]... n is that the nuclear states never use them or the threat of them against weaker non nuclear states.
Everybody hates nukes close to their borders. Why don't you just ask them why they hate it? Do you think JFK was upset over nothing when he found out nukes were in Cuba? Did the corporate news media get us to all fear a nuclear war over nothing? Did the USSR get upset over nukes in Turkey over nothing?
You are in denial of reality. Russia did not build the Satan missile for nothing. Nuclear war is a very real possibility. Lose the MAD myth. If it was true Russia would not have built the Satan Missile.........and Under Joe Biden, public funds allocated to nuclear weapons are slated to increase to 2 trillion by 2030.
Doesn't Biden believe the MAD myth like you? Apparently not.
01 May 22
@sonhouse said"when Earth becomes fully habitable again, the civilization that arises will undoubtedly be a better version of humanity than we have now."
@Metal-Brain
BTW, your god Putin has been seen several times slurring words, hanging onto his desk, walking wobbly, looks like he is in the last days of his life HOPEFULLY. Also, his inner circle of 'friends' are looking closely at replacing him with someone actually SANE.
If Putin is insane enough to start using nukes JUST TO WIN UKRAINE and WW3 starts up bigtime, if th ...[text shortened]... ain, the civilization that arises will undoubtedly be a better version of humanity than we have now.
You are an idiot. You think anarchy is better? Anarchy does not bring out the best in people. It emboldens selfish people to do what they have always wanted to do, your wife and daughter and a lot of other things.
The first thing that will disappear in a nuclear war is your moronic optimism.
02 May 22
@sonhouse saidA senior Pentagon official told reporters on Friday that the US does not believe there is a threat of Russia using nuclear weapons, but that person does not want anyone to know who he is. LOL!
@Metal-Brain
BTW, your god Putin has been seen several times slurring words, hanging onto his desk, walking wobbly, looks like he is in the last days of his life HOPEFULLY. Also, his inner circle of 'friends' are looking closely at replacing him with someone actually SANE.
If Putin is insane enough to start using nukes JUST TO WIN UKRAINE and WW3 starts up bigtime, if th ...[text shortened]... ain, the civilization that arises will undoubtedly be a better version of humanity than we have now.
In other words, that is what they want you to believe, not what they believe. Nobody wants to be quoted saying that. Why do you think that is?
https://wearechange.org/pentagon-official-says-u-s-sees-no-threat-of-russia-using-nuclear-weapons/
@metal-brain saidGoogle tactical nukes you halfwit they are designed for use on the battlefield not as an opening salvo for Armageddon.
If Russia is going to use one nuke they will use them all. There is no advantage to using one or 2 nukes when the other side might use all of theirs.
Your denial of a first strike advantage is absurd. If there was no advantage no nation would care how close nukes are to their nation, yet they clearly do. Did the USSR care when the USA put nukes in Turkey? Oh yeah! Did ...[text shortened]... ike first.
There will be no limited nuke use. It is all or nothing. This is not the 40s anymore.