I asked this question of a poster in the "Things Have to Change' thread, which included comments on Agents on horseback trying to turn the illegals back from our sovereign border. I simply asked what he thought about it, and he called me a raving idiot. How would that question prompt a response as livid as that? I just asked a question of a person who purports to have a legal background. So, as he said he would only respond to the subject at hand, I am now making it a subject, and ask him/her and everyone to say what they think about it. We know Shav, for instance, seems to say 'come one, come all', but he and everyone can append their comments if that works.
Edit: Aprox 50 of the invaders caught in May were on the terror Watch List. (3 in 2020, 15 in 2021, and 50 in 2022..... see a pattern?) FOX news has monitored other networks, they do NOT report on these statistics. That is why you fellers dont know what is going on.
I learned this on Brietbart News, which is the best source.
@averagejoe1 saidTake it to the Comic Book forum, Spanky.
I asked this question of a poster in the "Things Have to Change' thread, which included comments on Agents on horseback trying to turn the illegals back from our sovereign border. I simply asked what he thought about it, and he called me a raving idiot. How would that question prompt a response as livid as that? I just asked a question of a person who purports to have a ...[text shortened]... eir comments if that works.
Edit: Aprox 20 of the invaders in May were on the terror Watch List
@averagejoe1 said"Invaders"? Right wingers are so gullible and simple minded to accept propaganda at face value.
I asked this question of a poster in the "Things Have to Change' thread, which included comments on Agents on horseback trying to turn the illegals back from our sovereign border. I simply asked what he thought about it, and he called me a raving idiot. How would that question prompt a response as livid as that? I just asked a question of a person who purports to have a ...[text shortened]... fellers dont know what is going on.
I learned this on Brietbart News, which is the best source.
Have you ever read the words at the base of the Statue of Liberty?
@no1marauder saidJo, you are a complete moron. Can you imagine,
"Invaders"? Right wingers are so gullible and simple minded to accept propaganda at face value.
Have you ever read the words at the base of the Statue of Liberty?
in your small mind that migration has been going
on for hundreds, if not thousands of years?
Before there was a Border Patrol, before there was an Immigration Service there were immigrants............The only jobs they have taken were the ones that Anglos didn't want.........Get off your BIGOTED HORSE.
@no1marauder saidA quarter million people a month most certainly are invaders.
"Invaders"? Right wingers are so gullible and simple minded to accept propaganda at face value.
Have you ever read the words at the base of the Statue of Liberty?
What does the inscription on the Statue of Liberty have to do with anything? Is it written in our constitution somewhere?
@jj-adams saidIt's in line with the principles the country was founded on which had no immigration restrictions for almost the first 100 years:
A quarter million people a month most certainly are invaders.
What does the inscription on the Statue of Liberty have to do with anything? Is it written in our constitution somewhere?
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
https://poets.org/poem/new-colossus?gclid=CjwKCAjw77WVBhBuEiwAJ-YoJJpp7iVIiSOHc7YVeGUaLBcV0oCyotLlEcR2ItGfUP809LnP6-V6hxoCyRQQAvD_BwE
Immigration laws should be based on economic needs of the nation, not on white supremacist notions - which are really the basis for the right wing's obsessive campaign against immigration (legal or otherwise).
@no1marauder saidI know the inscription, and France did us no favors by putting that on the statue because everyone thinks that somehow that's what the US constitution is locked into obeying.
It's in line with the principles the country was founded on which had no immigration restrictions for almost the first 100 years:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
https://poets.org/poem/new- ...[text shortened]... e really the basis for the right wing's obsessive campaign against immigration (legal or otherwise).
The US does NOT have an obligation to accept everyone who wants to sneak themselves across the border.
@shallow-blue saidOMG it wasn't on the statue it was on the base of it.
France didn't put that on the statue. It's not on the statue. France speaks French. It's on the base of the statue, it's in English, and some damyank put it there.
Well I guess you showed me!
And yes, it's in English and was put there later.
So....WHAT?
It still isn't part of our constitution as many of you leftards believe.
@no1marauder saidDoes that answer your inane, question, Adams?,,,,,
It's in line with the principles the country was founded on which had no immigration restrictions for almost the first 100 years:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
https://poets.org/poem/new- ...[text shortened]... e really the basis for the right wing's obsessive campaign against immigration (legal or otherwise).
You ought read more.
@jj-adams saidSince when does 'US' mean French ? The inscription on the base, of the statue, was written by Americans years after the statue was delivered to American soil...............Read up, 'ya a mook.
I know the inscription, and France did us no favors by putting that on the statue because everyone thinks that somehow that's what the US constitution is locked into obeying.
The US does NOT have an obligation to accept everyone who wants to sneak themselves across the border.
@AverageJoe1
Here is my response: JOE BIDEN SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH AIDING AND ABETTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
And I agree, Breitbart rocks.
@no1marauder saidIf you think the laws should be changed, then CHANGE the fooking things while you hold the house, senate and executive.
It's in line with the principles the country was founded on which had no immigration restrictions for almost the first 100 years:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
https://poets.org/poem/new- ...[text shortened]... e really the basis for the right wing's obsessive campaign against immigration (legal or otherwise).
Until then you are breaking the fooking LAW
@jj-adams saidFunny. I myself wonder where he is going with that. The statue of liberty gives Carte Blanc to any and all?And someone else says that our country was founded on somesuch principle, when in fact it was founded on liberty from the Brits, monarchy,etc. why doesn’t Marauder Acknowledge the laws which pertain to the southern boundary of our country? Laws which allow about 1 million people to come legally into this country. When I say invaders, I am speaking of the people who do not come in legally. So since Marauder pulls the usual liberal-eze, can someone else address the question?
A quarter million people a month most certainly are invaders.
What does the inscription on the Statue of Liberty have to do with anything? Is it written in our constitution somewhere?
The words on the Statue?!?!?! I have never heard one famous lib bring that phrase up rregarding opening the border.
Marauder, while someone is Preparing their answer, tell us yes or no about allowing all of the terrorists coming over the border. Is that good or bad.