Go back
Pfizer, FDA coverup of ADE

Pfizer, FDA coverup of ADE

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
09 Apr 22

ADE, in case you are unfamiliar with it, is a phenomenon in which the immune system overreacts to a disease after being artificially over-primed for it by a “vaccine.” This reaction is deadly for some, as it involves the immune system basically killing the person with a cytokine storm.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-06-pfizer-fda-knew-antibody-dependent-enhancement-vaccinated.html

They were killing people and knew it. Are they above the law?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
09 Apr 22

@Metal-Brain
So tell us again where you got your Phd in genetic engineering and viral research?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
13 Apr 22

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
So tell us again where you got your Phd in genetic engineering and viral research?
Where did you get yours?

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
13 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
ADE, in case you are unfamiliar with it, is a phenomenon in which the immune system overreacts to a disease after being artificially over-primed for it by a “vaccine.” This reaction is deadly for some, as it involves the immune system basically killing the person with a cytokine storm.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-06-pfizer-fda-knew-antibody-dependent-enhancement-vaccinated.html

They were killing people and knew it. Are they above the law?
You're article's source is InfoWars.

Thread over.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
13 Apr 22
1 edit

@vivify said
You're article's source is InfoWars.

Thread over.
Attack the facts, not the source.
Does the article provide their sources or not? If infowars does you have no right to attack the source until you attack the source's source. Here is the source's source's source, the Pfizer documents!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
13 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
Attack the facts, not the source.
Does the article provide their sources or not? If infowars does you have no right to attack the source until you attack the source's source.

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.
InfoWars is as reliable as a psychic hotline.

They're citing a source that claimed the government is turning frogs gay.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
13 Apr 22

@vivify said
InfoWars is as reliable as a psychic hotline.

They're citing a source that claimed the government is turning frogs gay.
Here is the source's source's source, the Pfizer documents!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
13 Apr 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Here is the source's source's source, the Pfizer documents!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.
Yawn.

Still doesn't show your article's claims about the documents are correct.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
13 Apr 22

@vivify said
Yawn.

Still doesn't show your article's claims about the documents are correct.
These are the documents you moron!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
13 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
These are the documents you moron!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
And? Still doesn't mean what your article claimed about the documents are legit.

Documents exist; so what. Your article's report about them comes from someone who said in court he's just playing a "character".

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
13 Apr 22
1 edit

@vivify said
And? Still doesn't mean what your article claimed about the documents are legit.

Documents exist; so what. Your article's report about them comes from someone who said in court he's just playing a "character".
Learn to read!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

That is the only way you can prove me wrong. You cannot do it by denying the source you have in front of your face. I think you are afraid to find out you are wrong.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
13 Apr 22
2 edits

@metal-brain said
Learn to read!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

That is the only way you can prove me wrong. You cannot do it by denying the source you have in front of your face. I think you are afraid to find out you are wrong.
You say "learn to read" when your own reading comprehension is failing.

I'm not disputing the documents. Understand?

I simply doubt what *your* article says about the documents. I've told you before, post the actual report, not some right-wing conspiracy theorist's spin on it.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
14 Apr 22

@vivify said
You say "learn to read" when your own reading comprehension is failing.

I'm not disputing the documents. Understand?

I simply doubt what *your* article says about the documents. I've told you before, post the actual report, not some right-wing conspiracy theorist's spin on it.
"I simply doubt what *your* article says about the documents."

You have the documents. If it doesn't say what the article says you can easily prove it. What is stopping you?

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
14 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
Here is the source's source's source, the Pfizer documents!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.
Which of the documents in the list is the one containing the mentioned facts ?

Please try to be as speicific as possible, ideally when you first post and people might take a real interest. I was interested enough in clicking that link, but it contains too many documents for me to comb through. That is your task...

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
14 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
If it doesn't say what the article says you can easily prove it. What is stopping you?
That would require me to read InfoWars. Hard pass.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.