Go back
Pfizer, FDA coverup of ADE

Pfizer, FDA coverup of ADE

Debates

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
14 Apr 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
ADE, in case you are unfamiliar with it, is a phenomenon in which the immune system overreacts to a disease after being artificially over-primed for it by a “vaccine.” This reaction is deadly for some, as it involves the immune system basically killing the person with a cytokine storm.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-06-pfizer-fda-knew-antibody-dependent-enhancement-vaccinated.html

They were killing people and knew it. Are they above the law?
from your source:
The Daily Exposé also reported that an investigation of official government data revealed that the “fully vaccinated” for covid are almost three times more likely to develop a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and twice as likely to need hospitalization.


Any proof?
The data I know

e.g. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00152-0/fulltext

(Lancet is a prime peer-reviewed journal) says diffrently. Will I believe Lancet or Daily Exposé? hard call that one...

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
14 Apr 22
1 edit

another quote from your original source:

“Purebloods: prepare yourselves to lose 20-30% of everyone you know who has been jabbed,” wrote a commenter in response to the revelation.


So some unknown commenter is the level of proof you require? You could havel told us.

Lets do the test. I personnally know about 100 fully vaccinated (against COVID), when will I have been on the 20 burials? Full vaccination has taken place in december motsly. So I can report (If I am lucky to live) in December.

Just in case of a severe misunderstanding I fully expect to lose 100% of the group (in about 100 years time).

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
14 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
Attack the facts, not the source.
Does the article provide their sources or not? If infowars does you have no right to attack the source until you attack the source's source. Here is the source's source's source, the Pfizer documents!

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Your feeble attempt to avoid facts has failed.
About the cover up: The fact that a cytokine storm can be a rather severe side effect is so covered up that it is in the Wikipedia: (german version) : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zytokinsturm

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
15 Apr 22

@ponderable said
About the cover up: The fact that a cytokine storm can be a rather severe side effect is so covered up that it is in the Wikipedia: (german version) : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zytokinsturm
Right, because all Americans speak German.
You must be desperate.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
15 Apr 22
1 edit

@ponderable said
from your source:
The Daily Exposé also reported that an investigation of official government data revealed that the “fully vaccinated” for covid are almost three times more likely to develop a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and twice as likely to need hospitalization.


Any proof?
The data I know

e.g. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140- ...[text shortened]... peer-reviewed journal) says diffrently. Will I believe Lancet or Daily Exposé? hard call that one...
Pfizer’s own trial showed infection was significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo group — 409 versus 287 — within the first seven days of the jab.

U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:

Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more likely to die of COVID-19

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
15 Apr 22

@Metal-Brain
While ignoring the fact we are up to one MILLION dead from C19 right now.
Newer deadly variants are showing up and that is a much bigger deal than your piddling numbers of vaccine reactions.

But OF COURSE that won't stop you from finding anything you can weaponize.
That is ALL you have. WEAPONIZATION for the express purpose of causing dissent, with the aim of destroying the US as a democracy so we can be another Russia, which is a banana republic with a big military.

And barbarous in the bargain with your psychopath mentor Putin.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
16 Apr 22

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
While ignoring the fact we are up to one MILLION dead from C19 right now.
Newer deadly variants are showing up and that is a much bigger deal than your piddling numbers of vaccine reactions.

But OF COURSE that won't stop you from finding anything you can weaponize.
That is ALL you have. WEAPONIZATION for the express purpose of causing dissent, with the aim ...[text shortened]... ana republic with a big military.

And barbarous in the bargain with your psychopath mentor Putin.
U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:

Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more likely to die of COVID-19

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
16 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:

Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more likely to die of COVID-19

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
I state that in none of the dcouments your numbers are supported.

proof me wrong (should be a piece of cake)

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
16 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
Right, because all Americans speak German.
You must be desperate.
As opposed to you I give sources.
Having Google translate (or any other online translator) translating a wikipedia page is a piece of cake for any person with finished secondary education.

And you are the guy who regulyrly finds fault with professors (virologists for example)

Since we are at it: Did oyu read the Lancet paper? What does it say? Is it well sourced? Or do I read shortly that the paper had to be retracted because of Metal Brain's Sleuthwork?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
16 Apr 22
2 edits

@metal-brain said
"I simply doubt what *your* article says about the documents."

You have the documents. If it doesn't say what the article says you can easily prove it. What is stopping you?
I’m going to try and be patient and polite with you MB. Let me give you an analogy which typical in the Spirituality forum;

Poster #1 “Satan had sex with Eve causing mankind’s DNA to become polluted with evil. www.bibleinfowars.com

Poster #2 but your claim comes from bible infowars!

Poster #1 here’s bible inforwars source , it’s the Bible you moron www.thebible.com

Poster #2 but what bible infowars is claiming is not actually born out by the bible, it’s just an unsupported assertion

Poster #1 learn to read! It’s actually from the bible itself

Poster #2 it’s not about reading, it’s about recognising a false claim. The claim is making stuff up which is NOT in the bible

Poster #1 moron!!

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
16 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:

Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more likely to die of COVID-19

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Firstly your link isn’t to “UK government data” is to a web portal with further links to dozens and dozens of Pfizer’s documents.

Secondly exactly which of these documents and on which page supports the 3 claims in this post by you?

Thirdly what have these claims got to do with your OP?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
16 Apr 22

@ponderable said
As opposed to you I give sources.
Having Google translate (or any other online translator) translating a wikipedia page is a piece of cake for any person with finished secondary education.

And you are the guy who regulyrly finds fault with professors (virologists for example)

Since we are at it: Did oyu read the Lancet paper? What does it say? Is it well sourced? Or do I read shortly that the paper had to be retracted because of Metal Brain's Sleuthwork?
Stop lying.
I gave you the source.

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Try reading it.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669855
Clock
16 Apr 22

@metal-brain said
Stop lying.
I gave you the source.

http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Try reading it.
You lie. You don't give a sourec you give a heap of documents.

Point to the document that gives the relevant information.

It is your claim, so the burden of proof is with you.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
16 Apr 22

@Ponderable
He thinks he is overwhelming us with documents and maybe we will just fall over and play dead.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22640
Clock
24 Apr 22

@sonhouse said
@Ponderable
He thinks he is overwhelming us with documents and maybe we will just fall over and play dead.
Fauci CAUGHT Telling Wuhan Lab To DESTROY ‘Confidential’ And ‘Secret’ Evidence According To Bombshell Leaked Doc

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/04/20/fauci-funded-galveston-entered-into-secret-agreement-with-wuhan/

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.