Go back
pro-life

pro-life

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
men cotrolling the repro rights of woman, lol.. good one. It's never about the baby to pro choice people. You always divert to something else. I give a woman all the rights in the world to reproduce. If you don't want to reproduce, don't get freaking pregnant...and if you do take some responsiblity and don't kill the baby. You can call it a fetu ...[text shortened]... outside the womb at 12, 15, 20 weeks, whatever doesn't mean it isnt a living human being.
At what point is it then? 2 days? 1 second? 1 nanosecond? Does laboratory fertilisation count?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
It's never about the baby to pro choice people.
What a crock of shit. It's all about the fetus/baby with me and I consider myself pro-choice.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

where is the hit-and-run thread starter missShell anyways???

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
but that is not the usual argument made by pro choicers, and the one i most disagree with...that an abortion should be ok at any stage.
What? I don't know any pro-choicers who make that their 'usual argument'.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
At what point is it then? 2 days? 1 second? 1 nanosecond? Does laboratory fertilisation count?
without being able to make that line clear there should be NO abortions, that's my point. It's all or nothing, and the 'all' is unacceptable since an abortion at week 39 is crazy.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
What? I don't know any pro-choicers who make that their 'usual argument'.
pro-choice advocates argue against ANY restrictions on abortions.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
It's her body, so she has the right to allow a fetus to grow for 12 weeks, and then mash it's brains with a blender because she's too stupid to use any form of contraception? Are you even reading what you type?

I am not anti abortion, there are many reasons why it would be valid. But, if someone has FOUR???? This is a misuse of the process, when the person is obviously not intelligent, and should be protected against herself.
Recced.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
where is the hit-and-run thread starter missShell anyways???
sleeping

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thread is moving to Debates in 5 minutes.

(Thread creator has been notified)

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
without being able to make that line clear there should be NO abortions, that's my point. It's all or nothing, and the 'all' is unacceptable since an abortion at week 39 is crazy.
No, there should be a reasoned and continual investigation into where that line is.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
pro-choice advocates argue against ANY restrictions on abortions.
Balls.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
No, there should be a reasoned and continual investigation into where that line is.
sure, but until then there are abortions being done post week 30..

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
pro-choice advocates argue against ANY restrictions on abortions.
how many pro-choice people have posted in this thread?

send them all an pm and see what they say on this matter.

i'll save you the embarrassment of publishing your results here.....

either do this to prove yourself so very, very wrong or shut up.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
sure, but until then there are abortions being done post week 30..
Where?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Forum Moderator
Thread is moving to Debates in 5 minutes.

(Thread creator has been notified)
I think that is good decision, not that you really care what I think. 😉

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.