@Suzianne saidNothing. Be honest, little feller. Destroyed evidence, and govt property with hammers and bleach. Defrauded here and there, bought dossier, I have forgotten, there are soo many violations of the law.
For doing nothing wrong.
Yeah, burn her at the stake. For nothing.
You guys are really bat-sh-- crazy, you know?
That is a given, by the way. The issue was Comey turning her loose. Downer. Said she broke the law, but did not intend to.;!!!1
@AverageJoe1 saidSince when is opposition research against the law?
Nothing. Be honest, little feller. Destroyed evidence, and govt property with hammers and bleach. Defrauded here and there, bought dossier, I have forgotten, there are soo many violations of the law.
That is a given, by the way. The issue was Comey turning her loose. Downer. Said she broke the law, but did not intend to.;!!!1
You guys are pulling at strings.
@AverageJoe1
SITE THE SOURCE? So SCOTUS giving POTUS total immunity is not enough? I think even YOU have heard that one, right? You do know PRESENT and future POTUS has total immunity and that is one DEFINITION of a king.
Project 2025 which I HAVE linked to you SEVERAL TIMES wants to add even more power to POTUS,
and their agenda for starters is to kill Obamacare so 30 million people will lose their insurance, a really good thing?
Or do you agree with the entire agenda?
@sonhouse saidThe problem with all of your posts is that you just say 'TOTAL Immunity'' which is incorrect. That would mean he could carry a piece and use it on anybody he would like. Sounds silly, but, that is what you are saying. Hard to respond to stuff like that, you are so angry.
@AverageJoe1
SITE THE SOURCE? So SCOTUS giving POTUS total immunity is not enough? I think even YOU have heard that one, right? You do know PRESENT and future POTUS has total immunity and that is one DEFINITION of a king.
Project 2025 which I HAVE linked to you SEVERAL TIMES wants to add even more power to POTUS,
and their agenda for starters is to kill Obamacare so 3 ...[text shortened]... on people will lose their insurance, a really good thing?
Or do you agree with the entire agenda?
PS: You chide my saying Cite the Source?? What is your source of 'total immuinity'? It is a logical request. So, cite the source. Whew.
@AverageJoe1 saidhttps://theweek.com/cartoons/567602/political-cartoon-donald-trump-pows
Trump is all about SUCCESS.
@sonhouse saidSonhouse? Sonhouse......this you tube does not mention 'Total Immunity".
@AverageJoe1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDLbYXwSgvY
Whew.
@AverageJoe1
It doesn't have to, the effect is the same for the most part, totally immune if the action under investigation is deemed 'official acts' or official duties of POTUS.
This is a huge change from the past 200 years of US history.
Much closer to making POTUS a king, and Biden now has that newly minted power already.
Don't you even care about near unlimited power in a president?
So for the purposes of argument, lets say Biden or Trump is has nearly the power of a king, which they did not have before this SCOTUS ruling, do you think that would be or is a good thing?
@sonhouse saidIf this means president Trump can have biden committed to a lunatic asylum as an official duty, lets vote for trump.
@AverageJoe1
It doesn't have to, the effect is the same for the most part, totally immune if the action under investigation is deemed 'official acts' or official duties of POTUS.
This is a huge change from the past 200 years of US history.
Much closer to making POTUS a king, and Biden now has that newly minted power already.
Don't you even care about near unlimited powe ...[text shortened]... g, which they did not have before this SCOTUS ruling, do you think that would be or is a good thing?
@Wajoma
What you don't seem to understand is BIDEN is POTUS right now and the immunity given by SCOTUS applies to him RIGHT NOW so HE could commit TRUMP to an asylum and get away with it. BIDEN is the one near a king in power and has the next four months to use it if he choses and 4 more years of kinghood if he is reelected and all you yokels who think he is senile would be wrong because there is a big difference between a debate and the fact he has expert advisors, something that Trump would puke over, 'I don't need no stinking advisors, I can do it ALL myself'
One good thing, you have no say in our elections, all you can do is bitch and moan like a pissed off monkey on a branch by itself.
@sonhouse saidbiden couldn't do that, because he's such a retard now he can't wipe his own ass.
@Wajoma
What you don't seem to understand is BIDEN is POTUS right now and the immunity given by SCOTUS applies to him RIGHT NOW so HE could commit TRUMP to an asylum and get away with it. BIDEN is the one near a king in power and has the next four months to use it if he choses and 4 more years of kinghood if he is reelected and all you yokels who think he is senile would b ...[text shortened]... y in our elections, all you can do is bitch and moan like a pissed off monkey on a branch by itself.
@sonhouse saidBy 'it doesnt have to', SHOuse answered an earllier query above with a youtube, which had nothing to do with the issue at hand.
@AverageJoe1
It doesn't have to, the effect is the same for the most part, totally immune if the action under investigation is deemed 'official acts' or official duties of POTUS.
This is a huge change from the past 200 years of US history.
Much closer to making POTUS a king, and Biden now has that newly minted power already.
Don't you even care about near unlimited powe ...[text shortened]... g, which they did not have before this SCOTUS ruling, do you think that would be or is a good thing?
I could just scream. I call him on it, and he says that it does not have to,
You faeries expect us tougher guys to be able to banter with antics like that? Boring City.
@sonhouse saidIf a president, maybe RFK or kamala or reagan or anyone, has the power of a King, that would not be a good thing. Ask me some more questions. I answer. You do not answer questions. Can you tell us that you have answered my principal questions of late? Can you tell us why you don't?
@AverageJoe1
It doesn't have to, the effect is the same for the most part, totally immune if the action under investigation is deemed 'official acts' or official duties of POTUS.
This is a huge change from the past 200 years of US history.
Much closer to making POTUS a king, and Biden now has that newly minted power already.
Don't you even care about near unlimited powe ...[text shortened]... g, which they did not have before this SCOTUS ruling, do you think that would be or is a good thing?
@AverageJoe1
The thing is, the theoretical question about POTUS having the power of a king is not now theoretical and my only assumption about you in particular would be you fully agree with project 2025, feigning ignorance when you know full well exactly what it will mean for our country if fully brought to bare in a Trump presidency.
I think you are fully aligned with the Christian nationalist movement which is what the Heritage foundation is at its very core and the manifesto IS project 2025.
Either you are deliberately obtuse or you fully agree with their sick agenda.
@sonhouse saidI am not being funny, I have no idea what you are talking about except that you think AVJOE can have an effect on the world if he sets all aside and studies fringe groups.
@AverageJoe1
The thing is, the theoretical question about POTUS having the power of a king is not now theoretical and my only assumption about you in particular would be you fully agree with project 2025, feigning ignorance when you know full well exactly what it will mean for our country if fully brought to bare in a Trump presidency.
I think you are fully aligned with th ...[text shortened]... to IS project 2025.
Either you are deliberately obtuse or you fully agree with their sick agenda.
Oh, wait, you want to pick the group I study................
I demand that you read Epoch Times and National Review. I bet you wont do it, I bet you are scared to do it, Why wont you do it!!!???