27 Jul 23
@no1marauder
In other words, you have no explanation. You just blindly accepted big pharma propaganda that makes no sense at all.
Kennedy is not an anti vaxxer no matter how many times you lie about it. He has fought to make vaccines safer just like Ralph Nader fought to make automobiles safer. Is Nader anti automobile? Yes or no?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
27 Jul 23
@metal-brain saidI gave you a link; read it. The section labeled "Background" answers your question.
@no1marauder
In other words, you have no explanation. You just blindly accepted big pharma propaganda that makes no sense at all.
Kennedy is not an anti vaxxer no matter how many times you lie about it. He has fought to make vaccines safer just like Ralph Nader fought to make automobiles safer. Is Nader anti automobile? Yes or no?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
Parroting over and over the same line doesn't make it any more persuasive; Nader's work was designed to and did cause many improvements to be made to auto safety while RFK's unscientific ranting has accomplished nothing but increase distrust of established, safe vaccines and to the extent anyone listens to him, caused more sickness and death.
27 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidKennedy fought to keep mercury out of fish. Is he anti fish too?
I gave you a link; read it. The section labeled "Background" answers your question.
Parroting over and over the same line doesn't make it any more persuasive; Nader's work was designed to and did cause many improvements to be made to auto safety while RFK's unscientific ranting has accomplished nothing but increase distrust of established, safe vaccines and to the extent anyone listens to him, caused more sickness and death.
The reason nobody accused Kennedy of being anti fish or of Nader being anti automobile is because big pharma is not in the fish or automobile business. If they were perhaps they would try to make polluted fish immune from lawsuits and claim they could never get fish to market without a mercury in fish immunity law. Just as ridiculous, isn't it?
Post the answers if you stand by the logic of those answers. I will still ask you why a relatively safe vaccine needs immunity from lawsuits. That is why you are too cowardly to post it and everyone here knows it. You lose.
27 Jul 23
@metal-brain saidSeriously GFY. You're too lazy to go to a link I already provided which details the pre-1986 history when manufacturers stopped selling certain vaccines because of liability concerns. Your childish insults fit your internet punk persona, but your persistently stubborn ignorance make you a laughingstock here.
Kennedy fought to keep mercury out of fish. Is he anti fish too?
The reason nobody accused Kennedy of being anti fish or of Nader being anti automobile is because big pharma is not in the fish or automobile business. If they were perhaps they would try to make polluted fish immune from lawsuits and claim they could never get fish to market without a mercury in fish imm ...[text shortened]... ity from lawsuits. That is why you are too cowardly to post it and everyone here knows it. You lose.
27 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidUh oh, MB put in Marauder's dog house for overlooking a link. Really bad. He is suggesting that if you do not read his links, that you can not understand his (the link's opinion, mind you) opinion.
Seriously GFY. You're too lazy to go to a link I already provided which details the pre-1986 history when manufacturers stopped selling certain vaccines because of liability concerns. Your childish insults fit your internet punk persona, but your persistently stubborn ignorance make you a laughingstock here.
27 Jul 23
@no1marauder said" manufacturers stopped selling certain vaccines because of liability concerns."
Seriously GFY. You're too lazy to go to a link I already provided which details the pre-1986 history when manufacturers stopped selling certain vaccines because of liability concerns. Your childish insults fit your internet punk persona, but your persistently stubborn ignorance make you a laughingstock here.
So their vaccines were not safe. Why else would they have liability concerns?
27 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidYou would have to ask him. While you are at it ask him if he was vaccinated when he was a child. I was.
Name one vaccine RFK Jr. approves of. Is he OK with the polio one?
27 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidI don't believe that. Your source has peddled misinformation before. Where did Rolling Stone magazine get their information? Only an idiot would take the word of a known lying left wing source like RS mag.
"I do not believe that infectious disease is an enormous threat to human health."
Not Doctor RFK Jr.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/rfk-kennedy-anti-vaccine-panel-conspiracies-hiv-spanish-flu-1234779689/
27 Jul 23
@metal-brain saidHahaha holy Smoly that level of unintentional irony should come with a vaccine
I don't believe that. Your source has peddled misinformation before. Where did Rolling Stone magazine get their information? Only an idiot would take the word of a known lying left wing source like RS mag.
27 Jul 23
@metal-brain saidAlready explained.
" manufacturers stopped selling certain vaccines because of liability concerns."
So their vaccines were not safe. Why else would they have liability concerns?
That a vaccine might trigger an adverse reaction in a tiny subset of those who receive it doesn't make it not "safe" - otherwise no vaccine would be "safe".
@metal-brain saidIt's a direct quote.
I don't believe that. Your source has peddled misinformation before. Where did Rolling Stone magazine get their information? Only an idiot would take the word of a known lying left wing source like RS mag.
The same quote is here as well as him dodging the question are there any safe vaccines. https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kxkxq/robert-f-kennedy-jr-gives-the-game-away