Go back
Ruth Ginsberg

Ruth Ginsberg

Debates

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20
1 edit

@zahlanzi said
Can senate democrats filibuster the vote until Biden is sworn in?
No, Moscow Mitch and the Republicans eliminated the filibuster as regards judicial appointments.

EDIT: In technical terms, they made a vote for cloture i.e. to end debate require only a majority in judicial confirmation cases rather than the 3/5 required in most other cases.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
19 Sep 20

@no1marauder////////.I agree with marauder, MOSCOW MITCH will put forth a nominee, probably without any debate, and stack THE COURT 6-3....Easy to hold up OBAMA'S nomination for over a year, can't hold off on these NAZI nominations for a month....Statesmanship, that's all there is to it....

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
how can dems expand anything without control of the house and senate?
They can't, but they'll have both and the Presidency in January 2021.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20

Assuming that Trump and Moscow Mitch are successful in getting a hard core right winger in the Scalia model on the SCOTUS by January, the "swing" vote on the court would go from Roberts to Kavanaugh.

Whether that would be ideologically significant is a bit unclear; Kavanaugh has been pretty similar to Roberts in his voting patterns.

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
19 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
who was ELECTED to control the govt agencies?
I didn’t say Trump administration. I said Trump campaign.
Read my posts more carefully.

caissad4
Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618778
Clock
19 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
as evidenced by judges taking control of the USPS and dem governors extending vote result time lines by weeks, yes I think foul play is to be expected.
Thousands upon thousands of Americans depend upon upon the USPS for delivery of life sustaining medications and the actions of the Trump Toady endangered the lives of thousands upon thousands of Americans . You claim to be pro-life but you are in favor of endangering the lives of thousands upon thousands of Americans . You are clearly a hypocrite . Fess up !!

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
19 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
all I hear is what the republicans said about this...what did the democrats say? oh yeah, the democrats dont want to do it that way now do they?
What are you babbling about are you saying the Dems want to push a SCOTUS candidate through before the January deadline.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20

A classy tribute from Chief Justice Roberts:

"“Our Nation has lost a jurist of historic stature. We at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague,” Roberts said. “Today we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her -- a tireless and resolute champion of justice.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/517185-chief-justice-john-roberts-ginsburg-a-jurist-of-historic-stature

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20418
Clock
19 Sep 20

Watch the dems go freekin balistic now.

What's her name, Amy Barret?? Ya. Let me see the dems dig up a woman claiming she was raped by Barret in 1992.

Break out the popcorn

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89758
Clock
19 Sep 20

@no1marauder said
Assuming that Trump and Moscow Mitch are successful in getting a hard core right winger in the Scalia model on the SCOTUS by January, the "swing" vote on the court would go from Roberts to Kavanaugh.

Whether that would be ideologically significant is a bit unclear; Kavanaugh has been pretty similar to Roberts in his voting patterns.
Can’t the Democrats, once they control all three houses, just stick an extra 3 judges on the supreme court and fill it with left-wingers for a life-time?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20

@shavixmir said
Can’t the Democrats, once they control all three houses, just stick an extra 3 judges on the supreme court and fill it with left-wingers for a life-time?
They can and they should though 4 or 6 is a better number.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669862
Clock
19 Sep 20

@no1marauder said
They can and they should though 4 or 6 is a better number.
I diagree here. Let the court stay at a manageable size.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Sep 20

@ponderable said
I diagree here. Let the court stay at a manageable size.
What makes 13 or 15 an "unmanageable size"?

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669862
Clock
19 Sep 20

@no1marauder said
What makes 13 or 15 an "unmanageable size"?
The more people sit around a table the more difficult any negotiation becomes.
Either that or some around the table are just there to give consent...

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
19 Sep 20

@shavixmir said
Can’t the Democrats, once they control all three houses, just stick an extra 3 judges on the supreme court and fill it with left-wingers for a life-time?
Doesn't work quite like that. SCOTUS judges are appointed for life. New Justices are only chosen when one retires, dies or is removed through impeachment.

The stars have to align for a liberal SCOTUS judge to be chosen; a judge has to be on the way out, a Dem president must be in office and that president needs enough Dems in the Senate.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.