https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-york-gun-law-supreme-court-decision/index.html
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law enacted more than a century ago that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home – an opinion marking the widest expansion of gun rights in a decade.
“Because the State of New York issues public-carry licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the State’s licensing regime violates the Constitution,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court’s 6-3 majority.
Here are some other recent rulings from the conservative SCOTUS:
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-york-gun-law-supreme-court-decision/index.html
Supreme Court limits ability to enforce Miranda rights
The court limited the ability to enforce Miranda rights in a ruling that said suspects who are not warned about their right to remain silent cannot sue a police officer for damages under federal civil rights law even if the evidence was ultimately used against them in their criminal trial.
The ruling will cut back on an individual's protections against self-incrimination by barring the potential to obtain damages. It also means that the failure to administer the warning will not expose a law enforcement officer to potential damages in a civil lawsuit. It will not impact, however, the exclusion of such evidence at a criminal trial.
The court clarified that while the Miranda warning protects a constitutional right, the warning itself is not a right that would trigger the ability to bring a civil lawsuit.
GOP lawmakers can intervene to defend North Carolina voter ID law, Supreme Court rules
Two Republican leaders of North Carolina’s legislature could step in to defend the state’s voter ID law even though the state’s attorney general, a Democrat, is already doing so, the Supreme Court said.
The opinion will make it easier for other state government officials to intervene in some instances in lawsuits when the state government is divided.
23 Jun 22
@vivify saidwhat do you see wrong with this?
Here are some other recent rulings from the conservative SCOTUS:
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-york-gun-law-supreme-court-decision/index.htmlSupreme Court limits ability to enforce Miranda rights
The court limited the ability to enforce Miranda rights in a ruling that said suspects who are not warned about their right to remain silent cannot ...[text shortened]... t officials to intervene in some instances in lawsuits when the state government is divided.
it has always been, ignorance of a law is no excuse, it is upon the individual to research laws in their area. I never understood miranda "RIGHTS" in the first place...you are supposed to know your rights.
23 Jun 22
@vivify saidwhat does the constitution say about this?
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-york-gun-law-supreme-court-decision/index.html
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law enacted more than a century ago that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home – an opinion marking the widest expansion of gun rights in a decade.
“Because the State of New York issues pu ...[text shortened]... gime violates the Constitution,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court’s 6-3 majority.
23 Jun 22
@mott-the-hoople saidThat if you’re in a well regulated militia (army) you can carry a gun.
what does the constitution say about this?
23 Jun 22
@shavixmir saidAn Army of one, like in the old recruitment ads?
That if you’re in a well regulated militia (army) you can carry a gun.
@vivify saidWell, that’s a sure sign the SCOTUS is in tune with the times… good grief.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-york-gun-law-supreme-court-decision/index.html
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law enacted more than a century ago that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home – an opinion marking the widest expansion of gun rights in a decade.
“Because the State of New York issues pu ...[text shortened]... gime violates the Constitution,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court’s 6-3 majority.
In fact, thinking about it, it’s so bizarrely badly timed, one might be forgiven in thinking it’s a deflectoon from the Jan 6th hearings…
@shavixmir saidhow do you form a "well regulated militia" if you dont have arms?
That if you’re in a well regulated militia (army) you can carry a gun.
@shavixmir saidI was being facetious you big contrary doosh
No. Read your own fukking constitution you retard.
@lipareeno saidIf Shav got home invaded, r#ped up th$ butt...., and his entire family murdered.....he'd still blame it on racism by MiTee WyTee.
Guys just ignore Shavixmir.
He thinks only black criminals should be allowed to have guns.
23 Jun 22
@mott-the-hoople saidRetard.
how do you form a "well regulated militia" if you dont have arms?