23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainI understand that you are an irrational nut.
I don't even like Trump. I just like the challenge.
You really don't understand me do you?
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderOkay. Lindsay Graham and Orin Hatch then.
Thursday.
Rand Paul isn't on the Senate Judiciary Committee BTW.
You really have turned into one of the most vocal defender of Trump and his cronies on this Forum. It is remarkable you have ascertained the truth of Blasey Ford's allegations without ever hearing her under oath or Kavanaugh's under oath testimony in response.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderLOL!
I understand that you are an irrational nut.
You just don't like that I do well debating things I don't even feel that strongly about. You would feel better if I was a Trump worshipper so you didn't feel like such a failure at this.
I created a thread with an OP link alleging that Kavanaugh is a conspiracy theorist. Didn't that make you happy?
Originally posted by @metal-brainLast I heard, the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee don't want to question Ford personally - they want to hire an outside counsel to do so:
Okay. Lindsay Graham and Orin Hatch then.
But they're eager to avoid the spectacle of 11 Republican men cross-examining a woman who says she's been victimized by a man. Doing so would almost certainly evoke the panel's handing of Hill and potentially alienate suburban women voters who could decide the elections and control of the House and Senate.
Republicans are considering bringing in an outside counsel, possibly a woman, to question Ford.
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/22/us/politics/ap-us-kavanaugh-vs-ford-optics.html
The politics of a bunch of old guys attacking a woman who has alleged a sexual assault doesn't seem very appealing all of a sudden.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainStop being cynical.
Stop being faint hearted. Politics attracts crazy people, it is a fact. Some left wing nut job went on a republican shooting spree as if republicans were in season. If you are involved in politics you get death threats. Only the naive don't expect it when they get involved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Congressional_baseball_shooting
Just because something is typical doesn't mean it is appropriate or moral or just. If Americans learn nothing else from this administration, then they should at least learn that lesson well.
I don't intend to normalize death threats--against either of them--to the point that we shame them when they are traumatized by those death threats. I challenge you to say the same.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @wittywonkaIt is already normal whether you like it or not. How many death threats do you think Trump gets per day?
Stop being cynical.
Just because something is typical doesn't mean it is appropriate or moral or just. If Americans learn nothing else from this administration, then they should at least learn that lesson well.
I don't intend to normalize death threats--against either of them--to the point that we shame them when they are traumatized by those death threats. I challenge you to say the same.
Stop pretending not to be cynical. This is the real world.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderThat has not stopped Trump. He must not have gotten the memo. LOL
Last I heard, the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee don't want to question Ford personally - they want to hire an outside counsel to do so:
But they're eager to avoid the spectacle of 11 Republican men cross-examining a woman who says she's been victimized by a man. Doing so would almost certainly evoke the panel's handing of Hill and potentiall ...[text shortened]... attacking a woman who has alleged a sexual assault doesn't seem very appealing all of a sudden.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainYou're conflating what is and what should be.
It is already normal whether you like it or not. How many death threats do you think Trump gets per day?
Stop pretending not to be cynical. This is the real world.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @wittywonkaNations should not invade other nations based on no existent WMDs but you don't care do you?
You're conflating what is and what should be.
https://www.rt.com/usa/421838-mueller-iraq-wmd-trump/
You are not cynical enough.
Originally posted by @no1marauderford has not accepted anything. Or better yet, the DNC lawyers haven't. Go ahead and point to one of my predictions that was wrong...Ill wait.
Your uncanny ability to make bold predictions that are always wrong remains intact. https://deadline.com/2018/09/update-christine-blasey-ford-accepts-senate-testimony-offer-date-to-be-set-1202469506/
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleShannon Bream
...never intended to.
✔
@ShannonBream
Committee source says they’ve contacted five people alleged to be at party. 4 deny any knowledge of the party and allegations. 5th person - Dr. Ford - is the only one who has not provided them a statement. #Kavanaugh
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleI don't suppose it could be because they are assswipes who don't want to get involved? NAH, that COULDN'T be it could it? Or perhaps so drunk they don't remember? I suppose you also think it's just fine the committee is not allowing ANY other witnesses, ONLY Ford and K? Or refusal to allow FBI to get involved? THAT would be because they don't want to lend ANY credibility to Ford's statements. Yessir, a real unbiased bunch on that committee. And you agree with the whole travesty. You are as morally corrupt as that committee.
Shannon Bream
✔
@ShannonBream
Committee source says they’ve contacted five people alleged to be at party. 4 deny any knowledge of the party and allegations. 5th person - Dr. Ford - is the only one who has not provided them a statement. #Kavanaugh
Originally posted by @metal-brainSo, you're basically admitting that you have no convictions at all.
LOL!
You just don't like that I do well debating things I don't even feel that strongly about. You would feel better if I was a Trump worshipper so you didn't feel like such a failure at this.
I created a thread with an OP link alleging that Kavanaugh is a conspiracy theorist. Didn't that make you happy?
You're merely trying to provoke reader reaction. You're trying to satisfy a twisted compulsion: A feeling that "any attention, is good attention".
This must be the emotional warmth, which life has long denied you.
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @sonhousewitness to What? Where? and When?
I don't suppose it could be because they are assswipes who don't want to get involved? NAH, that COULDN'T be it could it? Or perhaps so drunk they don't remember? I suppose you also think it's just fine the committee is not allowing ANY other witnesses, ONLY Ford and K? Or refusal to allow FBI to get involved? THAT would be because they don't want to lend ...[text shortened]... committee. And you agree with the whole travesty. You are as morally corrupt as that committee.
It seems your accuser doesn't even know this, how are you to find a witness to something that has no time or place? You really are stupid aren't you?
23 Sep 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleYou believe God created Earth in 7 days.
witness to What? Where? and When?
It seems your accuser doesn't even know this, how are you to find a witness to something that has no time or place? You really are stupid aren't you?
Who are you calling stupid ? 😛