03 Mar 05
Originally posted by milfryder4lifeReminds me of a T-shirt I saw on a website:
You people (those who want him locked up) are all the same. You just want to see famous people suffer. You’re jealous of their success. Of course sleeping with kids is weird, but MJ grow up in the spot light, and as a Jehovah witness, so u can only expect him to be that way. The mother of one of the kids has been indicted for fraud, so can you reall ...[text shortened]... molest those kids did it really cause them any harm. Sex offenders are treated way too harshly.
"Michael Jackson did not molest those children.
He made love to them."
04 Mar 05
Originally posted by milfryder4lifeAn utterly scary statement.
Even if he did molest those kids did it really cause them any harm. Sex offenders are treated way too harshly.
Either you are just being provocative for an argument's sake (which I doubt) or you just have no idea what is actually going on, and the long term harm that has been documented in countless victims.
On what do you base your statement; do you have any evidence or is it a private opinion??
😠😕😛😕ðŸ˜
04 Mar 05
Originally posted by milfryder4lifeI really do not know what to say about this post - I don't know whether to alert a moderator or if it is best that people get to read it.
You people (those who want him locked up) are all the same. You just want to see famous people suffer. You’re jealous of their success. Of course sleeping with kids is weird, but MJ grow up in the spot light, and as a Jehovah witness, so u can only expect him to be that way. The mother of one of the kids has been indicted for fraud, so can you reall ...[text shortened]... molest those kids did it really cause them any harm. Sex offenders are treated way too harshly.
There is nothing too bad that can happen to a child molestor. Children are extremely vunerable and must be protected from people who wish them harm. I am finding this quite hard to write as I am hopping mad at such an inane statement.😠ðŸ˜
As to whether Jackson should go to jail I concur with only if he is guilty.
Unfortunately I do not believe he will get a fair trial (it is possible that if guilty he will be found not so and vice versa) due to the media circus that follows it and pre-conceived ideas.
04 Mar 05
Originally posted by Mat KelleyI actually already alerted a mod and I am probably not the first or last to do so. I think this guy is trying to be funny but he is failing miserably.
I really do not know what to say about this post - I don't know whether to alert a moderator or if it is best that people get to read it.
There is nothing too bad that can happen to a child molestor. Children are extremely vunerable and must be protected from people who wish them harm. I am finding this quite hard to write as I am hopping mad at such ...[text shortened]... be found not so and vice versa) due to the media circus that follows it and pre-conceived ideas.
04 Mar 05
Originally posted by Hand of HecateI don't think we should reserve judgement at all. That is the nature of debate threads, to present your judgement and reasoning to persuade or be persuaded...
I think we should reserve judgement until he is found guilty or innocent. Either way, the guy needs some serious mental health treatment. I think it will be difficult to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If he is found guilty the harashest of penalties should apply.
Off topic, sorry 🙂
12 Mar 05
1 edit
Originally posted by CalJustEven if sexual contact between and adult and child causes no long-term harm, it is still surely still wrong for three reasons:
An utterly scary statement.
Either you are just being provocative for an argument's sake (which I doubt) or you just have no idea what is actually going on, and the long term harm that has been documented in countless victims.
On wh ...[text shortened]... o you have any evidence or is it a private opinion??
😠😕😛😕ðŸ˜
First, the imbalance of power between child and adult means that there is a substantial risk of harm, whether it occurs or not, and there should therefore be a strict statutory ban.
Second, whether there is harm or not, the child is liable to find the experience disturbing or traumatic when it occurs, because the act is instigated to please the adult, not the child, and indeed, typically ignoring the wishes of the child, treating them as a means and not as an end.
Third (though more controversially) regardless of the question of harm or disturbance, the act is just intrinsically unsavory in itself.
Incidentally, the question of whether intergenerational sex necessarily leads to long-term harm for the younger party is hotly contested. But even if intergenerational sex does not lead to long-term harm, that does not mean that intergenerational sex is not to be frowned upon; rather it means that human nature can often be tough in the face of adversity.
http://www.csulb.edu/~asc/child.html
13 Mar 05
Originally posted by sasquatch672This reminds me of the Salem witch trials. Just for sticking up for, someone I am accused of the same crime.
When I posted to this guy, the post was taken down and I got a two-day ban. I think the gist of my post was "you'll be caught soon enough, and so prepare yourself for a long and deserved jail term". I got banned and this guy's post is still on the site?