Go back
Should RHP ban for misinformation?

Should RHP ban for misinformation?

Debates

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
05 Jan 22

@suzianne said
Freedom of Speech does not include Freedom to Lie.
yes it does

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
05 Jan 22

@vivify said
Funny how you equate banning misinformation with banning conservatives. That says a lot.

I'm referring to demonstrably false statements, not political ideology.
that is what the end game is…sad little person you are

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
05 Jan 22

@kevcvs57 said
You’d think he’d be banned just for constantly spamming covid and vaccine misinformation. He’s RHP’s forums version of Japanese knot weed.
"He"? There are several of them, it's just that one is somewhat more prolific and more obviously mental than the others.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Jan 22

@mott-the-hoople said
yes it does
No, it doesn't. That's why lying under oath is a crime. So is slander.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Jan 22

@mott-the-hoople said
that is what the end game is…sad little person you are
Wanting truth over lies is "sad"?

Typical conservative.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
05 Jan 22

@vivify said
If they don't, they should. Marjorie Taylor Green was permanently banned from Twitter for misinformation.

There's a certain inutile poster on this site who should get the same treatment.
If there's one thing that's been proven by Twitter is that it's impossible for a moderating organization to distinguish between misinformation and stuff they disagree with.

Twitter takes down or bans perfectly reasonable posts their moderators disagree with all the time.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54599
Clock
05 Jan 22

@kevcvs57 said
That’s why there are site forum rules that have to be abided by rather than some moderator taking umbrage based on their political leanings. Twitter will be the same.
You right wingers obviously believe that your opinion is on a par with scientific facts. Spoiler alert, it’s not. Facts exist whether you like them or not. And us folks who prefer facts to BS and harmful lies need somewhere we can go where we are not plagued by the MBs of this world.
Silly. “We right wingers believe that our opinions are on a par with scientific fact”. Ken not the same be said of left wingers? You sure leave a lot of things hanging..
You tend to use the word fact quite loosely. You yourself say that Tucker told a lie. You say that as if it is a fact. I have never seen a lie that he told, so I take exception to your calling that statement a fact.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37310
Clock
05 Jan 22

@shallow-blue said
"He"? There are several of them, it's just that one is somewhat more prolific and more obviously mental than the others.
Yeah I can think of lots of republicans/ trumptards here who put their own lop sided spin on current affairs and they probably accuse me of the same but MB tells very big lies about very important issues all the time, it’s like the lies are his agenda.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
05 Jan 22

@vivify said
No, it doesn't. That's why lying under oath is a crime. So is slander.
the subject is freedom of speech, not being under oath in court proceedings.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
05 Jan 22

@vivify said
Wanting truth over lies is "sad"?

Typical conservative.
I never said that, you are being dishonest

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Jan 22
2 edits

@mott-the-hoople said
the subject is freedom of speech, not being under oath in court proceedings.
You're claiming lies are protected under freedom of speech; if lying was a constitutional right, it wouldn't be illegal to do so in court proceedings or legal documents, because your "right" to lie would be infringed. You also couldn't be sued for false advertising.

So you're wrong.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37310
Clock
05 Jan 22

@mott-the-hoople said
the subject is freedom of speech, not being under oath in court proceedings.
Again only a government can restrict your freedom of speech, the fact that some commercial enterprises offer a sanctuary for patrons who are sick of hearing BS about covid and the 2020 election, to name but two, is not curbing your freedom of speech but it is protecting my right to not have it shouted at me every where I go.
Twitter and Facebook have decided that the liberal majority are their customer base for purely economic reasons. I’m sure you have your own echo chambers, stick with them and enjoy the company you find there.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Jan 22

@mott-the-hoople said
I never said that, you are being dishonest
You said my post about banning "demonstrably false information" was "sad". What I said was regarding your complaining about wanting truth is accurate.

Contenchess
Contentious

Joined
01 Sep 21
Moves
14125
Clock
05 Jan 22

@suzianne said
Freedom of Speech does not include Freedom to Lie.
Yes it does.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Jan 22

@contenchess said
Yes it does.
Can I falsely yell "fire" in a crowded movie theater? Or is that "freedom of speech"?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.