05 Jan 22
@mott-the-hoople saidNo, it doesn't. That's why lying under oath is a crime. So is slander.
yes it does
05 Jan 22
@mott-the-hoople saidWanting truth over lies is "sad"?
that is what the end game is…sad little person you are
Typical conservative.
05 Jan 22
@vivify saidIf there's one thing that's been proven by Twitter is that it's impossible for a moderating organization to distinguish between misinformation and stuff they disagree with.
If they don't, they should. Marjorie Taylor Green was permanently banned from Twitter for misinformation.
There's a certain inutile poster on this site who should get the same treatment.
Twitter takes down or bans perfectly reasonable posts their moderators disagree with all the time.
05 Jan 22
@kevcvs57 saidSilly. “We right wingers believe that our opinions are on a par with scientific fact”. Ken not the same be said of left wingers? You sure leave a lot of things hanging..
That’s why there are site forum rules that have to be abided by rather than some moderator taking umbrage based on their political leanings. Twitter will be the same.
You right wingers obviously believe that your opinion is on a par with scientific facts. Spoiler alert, it’s not. Facts exist whether you like them or not. And us folks who prefer facts to BS and harmful lies need somewhere we can go where we are not plagued by the MBs of this world.
You tend to use the word fact quite loosely. You yourself say that Tucker told a lie. You say that as if it is a fact. I have never seen a lie that he told, so I take exception to your calling that statement a fact.
05 Jan 22
@shallow-blue saidYeah I can think of lots of republicans/ trumptards here who put their own lop sided spin on current affairs and they probably accuse me of the same but MB tells very big lies about very important issues all the time, it’s like the lies are his agenda.
"He"? There are several of them, it's just that one is somewhat more prolific and more obviously mental than the others.
@mott-the-hoople saidYou're claiming lies are protected under freedom of speech; if lying was a constitutional right, it wouldn't be illegal to do so in court proceedings or legal documents, because your "right" to lie would be infringed. You also couldn't be sued for false advertising.
the subject is freedom of speech, not being under oath in court proceedings.
So you're wrong.
05 Jan 22
@mott-the-hoople saidAgain only a government can restrict your freedom of speech, the fact that some commercial enterprises offer a sanctuary for patrons who are sick of hearing BS about covid and the 2020 election, to name but two, is not curbing your freedom of speech but it is protecting my right to not have it shouted at me every where I go.
the subject is freedom of speech, not being under oath in court proceedings.
Twitter and Facebook have decided that the liberal majority are their customer base for purely economic reasons. I’m sure you have your own echo chambers, stick with them and enjoy the company you find there.
05 Jan 22
@mott-the-hoople saidYou said my post about banning "demonstrably false information" was "sad". What I said was regarding your complaining about wanting truth is accurate.
I never said that, you are being dishonest
05 Jan 22
@contenchess saidCan I falsely yell "fire" in a crowded movie theater? Or is that "freedom of speech"?
Yes it does.