17 Mar 06
Originally posted by NargagunaCan you please provide one instance of an Iranian Suicide Bomber? Or are you jsut assuming that they have suicide bombers because it is what "TV" said?
Then, with their 'suicide-bomber' mindset, the rest of the world will be even more unsafe!
Can you please also provide one instant when Iran threatened "us"?
Simple fact is, is that Iran saw what happened to raq and don't want to be invaded by Bush and his "freedom fighting".
Just remember, Iraq did not have any weapons of mass destruction. Hasnt the world learnt from this yet???
17 Mar 06
Originally posted by princeoforangeImbecile. Why would Iran want to kill us all? Please dont say it is because of their religion, because that argument does not hold any water. I still havent heard one reason or one example of why Iran would be a threat or is a threat with nuclear weapons other than a vague "it is their menatlity". Thats just bull####. The consequences to Iran if they detonated a nuclear weapon would be complete and utter distruction of their own country in retaliation by the USA/EU. They are not stupid, they would be digging their own grave. They would not un provokedly attack any other country.
But don't worry, at least the Iranians will be safe and happy with there ability to kill us all. Unfortunately the idiots who support the Iranian regime will be protected from the nuclear fallout on account that their heads will be buried in the sand.
Or did you write another essay on this topic in year 8. Did your teacher mark you with a gold star. Wow, you must of felt special.
17 Mar 06
Originally posted by EsotericYou know, it doesn't do your credibility any good to start out a post with 'Imbecile'. There are arguments on both sides, valid ones,
Imbecile. Why would Iran want to kill us all? Please dont say it is because of their religion, because that argument does not hold any water. I still havent heard one reason or one example of why Iran would be a threat or is a threat with nuclear weapons other than a vague "it is their menatlity". Thats just bull####. The consequences to Iran if they detona ...[text shortened]... is topic in year 8. Did your teacher mark you with a gold star. Wow, you must of felt special.
so you should not engage in ad hominem attacks, it does no good for your own cause.
17 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is history behind the imbecile remark that goes beyond this post to previous arguments.
You know, it doesn't do your credibility any good to start out a post with 'Imbecile'. There are arguments on both sides, valid ones,
so you should not engage in ad hominem attacks, it does no good for your own cause.
17 Mar 06
1 edit
Originally posted by EsotericIran.together with some other Islamic states, nutures the bombers and kidnappers of the Islamic underworld. It was, for example,also the directing power behind the kidnappers of the American hostages way back in the '80s.
Can you please provide one instance of an Iranian Suicide Bomber? Or are you jsut assuming that they have suicide bombers because it is what "TV" said?
Can you please also provide one instant when Iran threatened "us"?
Simple fact is, is that Iran saw what happened to raq and don't want to be invaded by Bush and his "freedom fighting".
Just remembe ...[text shortened]... raq did not have any weapons of mass destruction. Hasnt the world learnt from this yet???
Just one instance? Well how about Salmon Rushdie. I won't mention the Danish forore.
Iran houses the most fanatical and vitriolic 'clerics' in the Islamic world,
17 Mar 06
1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadYes, thanks to our socialists, lib-dems, and Heathites, we have allowed uncontrolled mass immigration from backward countries, mainly 'ethnics', instead of heeding the warnings of politicians like Enoch Powell, whose predictions have now been realised .
I notice that no one has yet pointed out that Britain has a few mad mullahs who incite their youth to become suicide bombers. 🙂
So now we have to jail wallahs, like the hook-handed mullah, after he has been allowed to incite his followers to mass murder for the last 9 years. Thanks to Blair.
18 Mar 06
Originally posted by nomindAt any rate you seem to have chosen a most approprate ID name.
you brits should follow the example of the u.s. build a really BIG wall along your border. that should do it. because it's a wall... and it's really big... wait a minute, whose fucking idea was this anyway?
18 Mar 06
3 edits
I say the US should lift trade sanction from Iran so that they can
develop their technology in-line with the rest of the world and not
have to watch their civilian planes drop from the sky coz the cardboard
gets wet when it rains.
Screw giving them nuclear capabilities.
edit - and give 'em all internet capabilities, heavily censored with
thanks to google's world domination plan so that they can view a bit
of Israeli porn once in a while .
Welcome to the global village, pullup a mud hut and let's talk.
18 Mar 06
Originally posted by ASROMALook, I do happen to know that sand will not protect you from nuclear fallouts. If you can't debate sensibly, don't but don't take irony too seriously or you'll end up looking like a fool. You should visit grade school to learn the spelling of weak. "week"
Actually with just your head buried in the sand, you wouldn't survive a nuclear explosion.
I suppose you are going to tell me differently because you wrote an essay on it in grade school.
You are ignorant even in your week attempts at wit and humour.
How apposite.
18 Mar 06
Originally posted by NargagunaSo you can't provide an instance of an Iranian suicide bomber then?
Iran.together with some other Islamic states, nutures the bombers and kidnappers of the Islamic underworld. It was, for example,also the directing power behind the kidnappers of the American hostages way back in the '80s.
Just one instance? Well how about Salmon Rushdie. I won't mention the Danish forore.
Iran houses the most fanatical and vitriolic 'clerics' in the Islamic world,
18 Mar 06
Originally posted by princeoforangeI was being sarcastic.
Look, I do happen to know that sand will not protect you from nuclear fallouts. If you can't debate sensibly, don't but don't take irony too seriously or you'll end up looking like a fool. You should visit grade school to learn the spelling of weak. "week"
Even you can't be that ignorant (but one would be forgiven for assuming otherwise in light of your posts).
In case you care to debate sensibly, I'm still waiting to hear what you think about the article in the New York Times.
Thanks for pointing out my spelling mistake.
I’ll be sure to ask my grade school principal for a refund.
Who knows, if I do it again, maybe you can help me write highly commendable essays.