Originally posted by scherzoWho are 'you'? You called yourself a "Marxist-Leninist". This term has a loaded history. From wikipedia:
No, honest question. What bad things have we done in the name of our proposed economic structure?
Marxism-Leninism is a communist ideological stream that emerged as the mainstream tendency among the Communist parties in the 1920s as it was adopted as the ideological foundation of the Communist International during Stalin's era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist-leninist
Is that who 'you' are? If not, please describe who 'you' are in more than two words.
Originally posted by PalynkaFor the purposes of this discussion, I am mostly Marxist, but also Leninist, as I feel that Lenin's ideals were a natural outreach of Marx's.
Who are 'you'? You called yourself a "Marxist-Leninist". This term has a loaded history. From wikipedia:
Marxism-Leninism is a communist ideological stream that emerged as the mainstream tendency among the Communist parties in the 1920s as it was adopted as the ideological foundation of the Communist International during Stalin's era.
http://en. ...[text shortened]...
Is that who 'you' are? If not, please describe who 'you' are in more than two words.
Originally posted by scherzoMarx fostered the authoritarian wing of the socialist movement. Lenin solidified that with the nonsense about the 'vanguard party.' The two were a linear progression straight to Stalin, which set socialism back about a hundred years. Millions of lives and billions of dollars later, what does the world have to show for the Marxist-Leninist misadventure?
What kind of IWW guy are you?!?
Bakunin represented the anarchist wing of the socialist movement. That was carried on by the IWW. But the false hope of the premature Bolshevik revolution shifted the balance toward the authoritarian, Marxist-Leninist conception of socialism. The Kronstadt sailors were then massacred, the anarchists were suppressed, all power was stripped from the soviets, and socialism was led down the path toward perdition.
Socialism existed before Marx. Maybe one day it will recover from his influence.
Originally posted by scherzoGaza is extremely relevant. Why are the Palestinians fighting? If they stop strugggling, the Israelis will give them enough food to live on, medicine, etc. That's socialism. It doesn't really matter which government you depend on.
Socialism.
But Gaza isn't relevant to this.
In capitalism, unrestricted capitalism, we get the robber barons. That's worse than Stalinism.
Palestinians want more than that. They want to run their own affairs. They want choice.
Freedom of choice is what capitalism is all about.