Go back
Study finds Bush admin lied 935 times to invade...

Study finds Bush admin lied 935 times to invade...

Debates

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't know what the big deal is -- whether President Bush lied or not is immaterial. We have to trot out the troops out every 10 years or so to try out new equipment and practice new tactics. More importantly, where do you think the officers who are going to lead the U.S. Army to liberate Europe again after the Islamists or Russians take over is going to come from? Basically, we've got to season our officers and troops every now and then by letting them see some action.

DS

Joined
03 Mar 05
Moves
21495
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I don't know what the big deal is -- whether President Bush lied or not is immaterial.
in the lead-up to the invasion, many Americans knew that all the Iraq WMD stuff the Bush admin was pushing was suspect- but the supposedly "liberal" media just parroted these same 935 lies without question. Many Americans spoke up about it, but it didn't do any good- Scott Ritter, for example, a former weapons inspector and US Marine had dispelled the Bush admin's claims, but only the non-corporate news carried his articles. Others like Joe Wilson (we forget thet the original controversy wasn't about his wife), contrdicted the Bush admin's claims about Iraq's purchase of uranium from Niger. And of course, the Downing St Memo... For a great many people who were paying attention and applying a critical ear, it was painfully clear that the Bush admin was lying about Iraqi WMDs, but what can you do? protest, write your Rep... or spit into the ocean...

what concerns me is that there is an enormous amount of evidence that a US President purposefully lied to the American people to start a war and many people don't care. The Democrats have taken impeachment off the table because they are complicit. The media doesn't want to deal with it because they helped sell the war. The American people won't do anything about it because they're either Pro-Bush and/or blissed out on Dancing with the Stars. or they are marginalized liberals contemplating the futility/honorability of voting for Kucinitch.

either way, active, informed, participatory Democracy is on life-support here in the US.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by smw6869
I did buy the Nukulear lie, but i did not buy the all out war. We could have taken those sites out with air strikes alone, or let the French do it.

Yes, i was a sucker, but then i don't have any crystal balls to gaze into, as you do.

Iran?....No war with Iran. We'll could just buy them off as we did with N. Korea.

F. GRANNY.
Crystal balls?

The only balls around my apartment are balls that haven't shot enough of late.

There were various signs, however, in Iraq which led THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLD to believe they didn't have any nuclear weapons...

Hence the demonstrations and the lack of a second UN resolution on the matter.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I don't know what the big deal is -- whether President Bush lied or not is immaterial. We have to trot out the troops out every 10 years or so to try out new equipment and practice new tactics. More importantly, where do you think the officers who are going to lead the U.S. Army to liberate Europe again after the Islamists or Russians take over i ...[text shortened]... e've got to season our officers and troops every now and then by letting them see some action.
God damn you're a tragedy.

s
Granny

Parts Unknown

Joined
19 Jan 07
Moves
73159
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Darth Sponge
in the lead-up to the invasion, many Americans knew that all the Iraq WMD stuff the Bush admin was pushing was suspect- but the supposedly "liberal" media just parroted these same 935 lies without question. Many Americans spoke up about it, but it didn't do any good- Scott Ritter, for example, a former weapons inspector and US Marine had dispelled the ...[text shortened]... her way, active, informed, participatory Democracy is on life-support here in the US.
Yes, and what about the rise in the price of loco weed, Chief?
Maybe me should have another revolution. Packing any iron, or just pissing in the wind?

F. GRANNY.

s
Granny

Parts Unknown

Joined
19 Jan 07
Moves
73159
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Crystal balls?

The only balls around my apartment are balls that haven't shot enough of late.

There were various signs, however, in Iraq which led THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLD to believe they didn't have any nuclear weapons...

Hence the demonstrations and the lack of a second UN resolution on the matter.
"The only balls around my apartment are balls that haven't shot enough of late."

Dear god, i hope they don't cast shadows i may laugh myself to death.

F. GRANNY.

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
This means that Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and any other Democrat who voted for going to war with Iraq have innocent blood on their hands because they could have stopped it! Kinda makes you wonder what they got out of the deal, eh?
It certainly does - and I think all of the senators (from both parties) who, despite now knowing that the rationale for the war was a crock, continue throwing money at it with no 'get out' amendments are equally guilty and reprehensible.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Darth Sponge
in the lead-up to the invasion, many Americans knew that all the Iraq WMD stuff the Bush admin was pushing was suspect- but the supposedly "liberal" media just parroted these same 935 lies without question. Many Americans spoke up about it, but it didn't do any good- Scott Ritter, for example, a former weapons inspector and US Marine had dispelled the ...[text shortened]... her way, active, informed, participatory Democracy is on life-support here in the US.
Fear not -- we don't have a "participatory democracy" in the United States, but rather a Constitutional Republic.

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I don't know what the big deal is -- whether President Bush lied or not is immaterial. We have to trot out the troops out every 10 years or so to try out new equipment and practice new tactics. More importantly, where do you think the officers who are going to lead the U.S. Army to liberate Europe again after the Islamists or Russians take over i ...[text shortened]... e've got to season our officers and troops every now and then by letting them see some action.
Are you saying that tongue in cheek ... or head up ar$e?

DS

Joined
03 Mar 05
Moves
21495
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Fear not -- we don't have a "participatory democracy" in the United States, but rather a Constitutional Republic.
I meant that informed participation in the political process is made difficult by the media's predilection for being Bush Admin's uncritical mouth-peice, compounded by citizen apathy. And then there are people like you who support American Imperial ambitions and want more, apparently believing that the US is better than everyone else and can somehow export the "better" values at gunpoint. I think that history has shown us that Empire and Republic are not compatible. just ask Rome.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Darth Sponge
I meant that informed participation in the political process is made difficult by the media's predilection for being Bush Admin's uncritical mouth-peice, compounded by citizen apathy. And then there are people like you who support American Imperial ambitions and want more, apparently believing that the US is better than everyone else and can somehow ex ...[text shortened]... think that history has shown us that Empire and Republic are not compatible. just ask Rome.
The media have hardly been the Bush Administration's uncritical mouthpiece, nor is the United States an empire like Rome's. If anything, we have prosecuted this "War on Terror," like a bunch of girl scouts for fear of offending anyone. If we had followed Rome's lead, then we would have burned down our enemy's holy sites, cut off their leader's heads and converted the general populace to Christianity. Too bad we're not more like Rome.

Also, the United States has so many domestic enemies that the best course of action now would probably be to bring our troops home and use them on our domestic enemies like the DNC, the Dixie Chicks, Alec Baldwin, etc.

duecer
anybody seen my

underpants??

Joined
01 Sep 06
Moves
56453
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The media have hardly been the Bush Administration's uncritical mouthpiece, nor is the United States an empire like Rome's. If anything, we have prosecuted this "War on Terror," like a bunch of girl scouts for fear of offending anyone. If we had followed Rome's lead, then we would have burned down our enemy's holy sites, cut off their leader's he ...[text shortened]... and use them on our domestic enemies like the DNC, the Dixie Chicks, Alec Baldwin, etc.
you need help...really... I mean it.

DS

Joined
03 Mar 05
Moves
21495
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The media have hardly been the Bush Administration's uncritical mouthpiece, nor is the United States an empire like Rome's. If anything, we have prosecuted this "War on Terror," like a bunch of girl scouts for fear of offending anyone. If we had followed Rome's lead, then we would have burned down our enemy's holy sites, cut off their leader's he ...[text shortened]... and use them on our domestic enemies like the DNC, the Dixie Chicks, Alec Baldwin, etc.
sadly, you illustrate my point.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Fear not -- we don't have a "participatory democracy" in the United States, but rather a Constitutional Republic.
Democracy in the US today means,

"the freedom to debate an issue but without the power to influence the outcome"

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
24 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Democracy in the US today means,

"the freedom to debate an issue but without the power to influence the outcome"
Thank you McCain-Feingold!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.