03 Sep 20
@no1marauder saidThanks; I hadn't read the entire thread.
Please read my post on page 10. The bottom line was :
"So the initial interviewers accepted 88 out of 100 claims of "credible fear" but the February 2018 DHS release says only 13 of those were accepted by the immigration judges."
This is an entirely plausible explanation for the use of 88, which does seem odd on the surface.
03 Sep 20
@wolfgang59 saidWell then what the hell were they? you got my post removed.
What's "right here" earl?
What's your point?
Get back to trying to prove those allegations which I have denied.
I thought it was me explaining that you inferred I was a racist because I did not
take your "white supremacist" explanation seriously, ergo, I am racist.
Choose your poison
03 Sep 20
@divegeester
I have to say this reads like a message of reassurance to the white supremacists.
<grin> And what are they smoking these days in Jolly Ol'?
03 Sep 20
@earl-of-trumps saidFair point; Marauder has somewhat debunked the notion and I’m currently trying to get KazetNagorra’s hook out of my pallet.
@divegeester
I have to say this reads like a message of reassurance to the white supremacists.
<grin> And what are they smoking these days in Jolly Ol'?
03 Sep 20
@earl-of-trumps saidI never denied calling you a racist.
Well then what the hell were they? you got my post removed.
I thought it was me explaining that you inferred I was a racist because I did not
take your "white supremacist" explanation seriously, ergo, I am racist.
I've copied your quote which you are trying to prove twice now.
Your limited attention span is getting rather tiresome.
03 Sep 20
@wolfgang59 saidwolfgang, I am not trying to PROVE anything.
I never denied calling you a racist.
I've copied your quote which you are trying to prove twice now.
Your limited attention span is getting rather tiresome.
All I am doing is showing to everyone your conspiracy theorist stance in numbers.
Overall, I think you did a great job. Keep it up.
And thanks for the bump
03 Sep 20
@sonhouse saidYour link would not open.
@Earl-of-Trumps
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_(politics)
This is why it is polite and proper to clip some of the text you think is most
relevant.
Anyway, it looks like some definition of some kind, which I am not interested in.
04 Sep 20
@earl-of-trumps saidHear, hear. Uhhh, how about someone's own words in a debate. Why happened to THAT??
Your link would not open.
This is why it is polite and proper to clip some of the text you think is most
relevant.
Anyway, it looks like some definition of some kind, which I am not interested in.
04 Sep 20
1 edit
@Earl-of-Trumps
I tested the link and it opens for me. Maybe you have problem with your browser?
I know I have to use MS to get to RHP and even that I have to click a couple of boxes to get it to complete, Chrome refuses to let me into RHP.
Hey, below average Joe, dog whistle politics is saying something that means something to a certain group without upsetting the whole country.
Example, saying such and such is about 'family values' which is code for I believe in Christ and Christianity, without actually saying that so you don't tick off Muslims or Hindu's or some such.
04 Sep 20
@sonhouse saidIt opened, and what exactly in there am I supposed to labor over?
@Earl-of-Trumps
I tested the link and it opens for me. Maybe you have problem with your browser?
I know I have to use MS to get to RHP and even that I have to click a couple of boxes to get it to complete, Chrome refuses to let me into RHP.
Hey, below average Joe, dog whistle politics is saying something that means something to a certain group without upsetting the who ...[text shortened]... nd Christianity, without actually saying that so you don't tick off Muslims or Hindu's or some such.
You talk to me like I don't know the concept. Doh.
04 Sep 20
@earl-of-trumps saidYes you were, that is why you resuscitated this thread.
wolfgang, I am not trying to PROVE anything.
To prove your accusations from the "Strange" thread.
Only you can't do it can you?
Because you were wrong as usual.
04 Sep 20
@wolfgang59 saidI resurrected it to show that wolfgang59 is a conspiracy theorist in your own words.
Yes you were, that is why you resuscitated this thread.
To prove your accusations from the "Strange" thread.
Only you can't do it can you?
Because you were wrong as usual.
And you did a wonderful job. Thanks for bumping.
- Joined
- 06 Jul 20
- Moves
- 115
04 Sep 20
@sonhouse saidNo reference to Trump by Sonhouse!!!!!
@Earl-of-Trumps
I tested the link and it opens for me. Maybe you have problem with your browser?
I know I have to use MS to get to RHP and even that I have to click a couple of boxes to get it to complete, Chrome refuses to let me into RHP.
Hey, below average Joe, dog whistle politics is saying something that means something to a certain group without upsetting the who ...[text shortened]... nd Christianity, without actually saying that so you don't tick off Muslims or Hindu's or some such.