The post that was quoted here has been removedI've reported you, AGAIN.
If you want to accuse me of defending Neo-Nazis, first prove to me these
retailers are Neo-Nazis. So far, all you have done is draw numbers out of a hat.
If you want to converse with me, do not do so by flinging lies and insults.
Why did the DHS use the turn of phrase "out of 88"?
How can I answer when I don't even know what the frip you asked? Try English!
What is DHS, what means "turn of phrase"? "out of 88"????
How many retailers have you researched to see if they use the price $88 or $.88?
none, I bet.
But when a Trump retailer uses such a figure, whoa!!! We got ourselves a White Supremist Dog Whistle!!
Frankly, your argument belongs in the bin of crazed conspiracy theories.
"admit your mistake"... lololol, sure, kaz. As soon as you prove it to me.
07 Jul 20
@earl-of-trumps saidTry reading the entire OP and the four distinct examples contained therein.
I've reported you, AGAIN.
If you want to accuse me of defending Neo-Nazis, first prove to me these
retailers are Neo-Nazis. So far, all you have done is draw numbers out of a hat.
If you want to converse with me, do not do so by flinging lies and insults.
Why did the DHS use the turn of phrase "out of 88"?
How can I answer when I don't even know what ...[text shortened]... zed conspiracy theories.
"admit your mistake"... lololol, sure, kaz. As soon as you prove it to me.
07 Jul 20
@joe-shmo saidPerhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/hey-don%E2%80%99t-steal-my-nazi-flag.186072
EoT was the last poster. #44. Which is half of 88. I think you are on to something.
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
07 Jul 20
@kazetnagorra saidYou ruined it! My last post was #35, the transpose of which is 53. Added together...88!
Perhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
@kazetnagorra saidI thought your numbers of concern are 14 and 88.
Perhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
@joe-shmo saidNumerology, Joe.
I thought your numbers of concern are 14 and 88.
It's a parrrrrrrrr-ful weapon! HeHaaaaaaaaaa
I wonder if liberals/leftists use astrology charts, too.
Leftist: "Yes, Friday is optimal, according to my charts. Libra is rising in aquarius and the moondog is in philadelphia. We will burn down the police station on Friday night!"
07 Jul 20
@kazetnagorra saidTrying proving to me that the pricer didn't choose $88 on nothing more than market forces
Try reading the entire OP and the four distinct examples contained therein.
when you can prove that, come back and talk to me.
In the meantime, stop drooling on yourself.
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
@kazetnagorra saidNo... I cant think of a reason other than the one you alluded to. "Could just be a coincidence..." -kazetnagorra
So you can't think of a reason other than the one I mentioned in my OP?
Jesbus--welcome to the "tinfoil hat" club bub...
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
@kazetnagorra saidListen...there is a nonzero probability that a neo-Nazi works for the Department of Homeland Security and manipulated a statistic to allude to that. Happy? There is also a greater than zero probability that there is someone of opposite ideology that works for the DHS as well. What is your point? That the DHS is racist because you've uncovered this one piece of circumstantial evidence written over
Defending neo-Nazis it is, then?
two years ago that possibly ( as in "not out of the realm of all things possible" ) someone with neo-Nazi ideology manipulated to dog whistle support for Hitler?
07 Jul 20
@joe-shmo saidSo there is a high likelihood that a neo-Nazi works or worked for the DHS and wrote a piece for a government website that after two years is still online. There is a high likelihood that neo-Nazis work for the Trump campaign and that they have used the inverted red triangle - a Nazi symbol designating political opponents - in ads attacking Antifa.
Listen...there is a nonzero probability that a neo-Nazi works for the Department of Homeland Security and manipulated a statistic to allude to that. Happy? There is also a greater than zero probability that there is someone of opposite ideology that works for the DHS as well. What is your point? That the DHS is racist because you've uncovered this one piece of circumstanti ...[text shortened]... all things possible" ) someone with neo-Nazi ideology manipulated to dog whistle support for Hitler?
This does not concern you at all? Even the AfD does a better job trying to hide its links to white supremacists.