Go back
The Age of the Earth.

The Age of the Earth.

Debates

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
28 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
Unquestionably, God made the world look old so that scientists could become fools.
There's a great opening to "Good Omens" a book by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman that amongst other things says the dinosaurs are a joke that nobody's got yet, or words to that effect.

I should find it and type it out. Especially the part about the Earth being a Libra.

s

England

Joined
15 Nov 03
Moves
33497
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trawets113
They found a zircon crystal that was 4.4-billion-years-old and they reckon its the oldest object in the world so i think that says it all.
what was it on?? was not that older

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stoker
what was it on?? was not that older
And in what language did they communicate with it to ask its age?

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Pretty simple high school chemistry stuff here guys. The earth is basically just a bloody huge nuclear reactor inside. You work out the 1/2 life of the elements present and back extrapolate. A bit messy, but it comes out at ~4.5 - 5 billion years.

S

Joined
19 Nov 03
Moves
31382
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think the important thing to point out here is that, whilst science may use extrapolation and theory to examine the subject, there are empirical processes involved which whilst not perhaps complete (I'm not a geologist so I am unfamiliar with all the processes involved in dating such things, galaxies, the earth, fossils etc.), do provide an enormous body of evidence to support the theory that the earth is indeed older than 6000 years. On the other hand, there is no evidence on the part of the young earth advocate to support their theory outside of faith. Now faith is fine if you're attempting to justify a personal belief in the supernatural if that is how you see things, it is in no way sufficient on behalf of natural matters. And if dj2becker comes in and spouts anything about halos, I assure you there are plenty of articles of research disputing such ideas as faulty.

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
I think the important thing to point out here is that, whilst science may use extrapolation and theory to examine the subject, there are empirical processes involved which whilst not perhaps complete (I'm not a geologist so I am unfamiliar with all the processes involved in dating such things, galaxies, the earth, fossils etc.), do provide an enormous body ...[text shortened]... out halos, I assure you there are plenty of articles of research disputing such ideas as faulty.
Hear hear!!! Well done, at least a rational voice. My good sir i may have to challenge you to a game of chess!

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
29 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Well, not really. If you were talking about the sun, then it's certainly a big nuclear reactor. But, well hell, if fission was going on in the earth's crust, our energy - we wouldn't be talking about alternative energies right now.
Essentially yes you're right. My understanding is that the sun acts like a fusion reactor though. The immense gravity caused by the mass literally squeezes hydrogen atoms togther to make helium. Earth on the other hand is a fission reactor, but happily only not nearly on the same scale as the sun - we just don;t have enough radioactive elements in sufficient concentrations or purity to go into a run-away chain reaction. btw, here in NZ quite alot of our energy is geothermal in origin.

Truth be told, there is tonnes of energy available out there, more every day! We just like to depend on the photosynthesis of organisms some 100 - 400 million years ago...

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
30 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Well, not really. If you were talking about the sun, then it's certainly a big nuclear reactor. But, well hell, if fission was going on in the earth's crust, our energy - we wouldn't be talking about alternative energies right now.
There are reports of a natural nucleur reactor that kept itself running and stable for thousands of years in a uranium deposit.

K
Strawman

Not Kansas

Joined
10 Jul 04
Moves
6405
Clock
30 Nov 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
There are reports of a natural nucleur reactor that kept itself running and stable for thousands of years in a uranium deposit.
Aye there are, I've mentioned this before, but here's a take on it from people who are interested in storing waste from power generating nuclear reactors.

http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0010.shtml

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
30 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
Aye there are, I've mentioned this before, but here's a take on it from people who are interested in storing waste from power generating nuclear reactors.

http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0010.shtml
excellent stuff guys, thanks! The 'more power every day' i was referring to was, of course, incident radiation (i.e. sunlight)...

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
30 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Well, not really. If you were talking about the sun, then it's certainly a big nuclear reactor. But, well hell, if fission was going on in the earth's crust, our energy - we wouldn't be talking about alternative energies right now.
Oh, also Sasquatch, I never said the crust (although according to Xanthios it also happens here). I was referring to somewhere a little deeper! Try the mantle / core.

i
Deracinated

Sydney

Joined
29 Jan 04
Moves
103056
Clock
30 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
No, because I wasn't talking to you. I was responding to the original post in the thread.
I do believe Bowmann is losing it.

K
Strawman

Not Kansas

Joined
10 Jul 04
Moves
6405
Clock
30 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Oh, also Sasquatch, I never said the crust (although according to Xanthios it also happens here). I was referring to somewhere a little deeper! Try the mantle / core.
The Oklo reactors kill the "young Earth" theory all by themselves.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.