29 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidYoutube now allows people to say masks don't work.
Besides the fact they are not gene-vaccines and that they work (far less hospitalizations and death), it’s not only the CDC who hold this line: it’s every health institute on the planet, every virologist and nearly every government.
@metal-brain saidOk, genius. What does my "uniform" look like?
suzi is a liar. She is only here to lie and troll. She is too uniformed to debate.
https://rumble.com/v1hhq3l-1-did-fbi-tell-facebook-to-censor-hunter-biden-laptop-story.html
@sonhouse saidMental masturbation is about all he ever does on this forum. He does it for his own pleasure in sowing disinformation.
@Metal-Brain
This thread is not a debate, it comes from masters like you.
It is in fact a Masterbate.
29 Aug 22
@mott-the-hoople saidWhich is about the closest that a mullet head like you gets to a naked woman.
probably a very skimpy bottom, no top...usually accompanied by a pole in the center of the room
30 Aug 22
@metal-brain saidI’m not lying.
Stop lying!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/
You are spreading disinformation deliberately. What is the title to this article? Do you have the courage to say what it says?
Every single health authority and virologist says the same.
Okay… maybe one or two exceptions… but 98% is an awful lot. And every serious study I’ve been forced to read on the matter.
Hospitalizations and deaths were many-fold down anongst the vaccinated. The unvaccinated ended up more than 20 times more likely to be hospitalised. And people who have been hospitalised due to Corona are far more likley to suffer from long covid.
All facts that are measured and available.
That the death rate amongst vaccinated and unvaccinated has equalled out is due to the fact that if 100% of the population is vaccinated, then 100% of covid deaths will be amongst the vaccinated. It’s logic.
Then there’s this right-wing claim that during the Summer there have been more deaths than usual and that more of these deaths have been vaccinated people.
Uhuh… most vulnerable people in these countries have been vaccinated.
So, any reason (for example: a very hot and dry Summer or, a flu pandemic in Spring) that causes a rise in death, will have a greater effect on the vaccinated public.
3 Dutch commandos were shot in the US. The one who died was vaccinated.
Well, all 3 were vaccinated, to be precise. And the death of one if them had nothing to do with the vaccination, but with a shooting.
The Dutch CBS and RIVM did research in to the “extra death rate” and concluded that vaccines can’t be the cause. Nor is it likely suspects like cancer and the like.
The higher than average death rate is in older people there’s ongoing research into what the cause(s) could be.
@mott-the-hoople saidYou wish.
probably a very skimpy bottom, no top...usually accompanied by a pole in the center of the room
30 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidSo the recent week in NSW when all those that died of covid were vaccinated was ???
I’m not lying.
Every single health authority and virologist says the same.
Okay… maybe one or two exceptions… but 98% is an awful lot. And every serious study I’ve been forced to read on the matter.
Hospitalizations and deaths were many-fold down anongst the vaccinated. The unvaccinated ended up more than 20 times more likely to be hospitalised. And people who have b ...[text shortened]... than average death rate is in older people there’s ongoing research into what the cause(s) could be.
If the vaccine did nothing we'd expect to see about 10% of them to be unvaccinated. If the seizure syrup is "many fold" better we would have expected to see either 90% of the deaths to be unvaccinated or, all unvaccinated.
30 Aug 22
@sonhouse saidsonhouse may we see some of these numbers you're talking about, can we attribute them to mask wearing as you say?
@Wajoma
BULLSHYTE. It has already been shown by scientific analysis those counties using masks have less new cases of C19. THAT IS A FACT JACK and your so-called arguments are just political stonewalling.
Expected response: crickets
30 Aug 22
@sonhouse saidlol
@Wajoma
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
But OF COURSE you will poo poo such papers BECAUSE they come from actual scientists who of course know nothing.
China
"The study looked at the reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Beijing households by face mask use (10). It found that face masks were 79% effective in preventing transmission, if they were used by all household members prior to symptoms occurring. The study did not look at the relative risk of different types of mask.
Who's the commie now comrade.