30 Aug 22
@wajoma saidDon’t know what you are on about.
So the recent week in NSW when all those that died of covid were vaccinated was ???
If the vaccine did nothing we'd expect to see about 10% of them to be unvaccinated. If the seizure syrup is "many fold" better we would have expected to see either 90% of the deaths to be unvaccinated or, all unvaccinated.
Link to the story and I’ll have a look.
@sonhouse saidNSW Health, doltboy.
@shavixmir
If there is anything to it, it was probably put out by BretFART or Gab.
Edit: not coming from china where you get your numbers from.
@wajoma saidFrom the NSW, most recent report:
NSW Health, doltboy.
Edit: not coming from china where you get your numbers from.
There were 170 COVID-19 deaths reported this week. Of these, 49 (29% ) had not received three doses of vaccine. Eleven deaths were in people aged under 65 years. Deaths may not have occurred in the week in which they were reported.
And how high is the vaccination level again?
Ahhh… so, basically you are talking out your arse and trying to prove your bias by completely not understanding the numbers.
30 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidSo the seizure syrup is not 'many folds' effective. NSW health are bragging up their vax rate to about 90% so if the vax did nothing at all we'd expect 90% of the deaths to be unvaxxed.
From the NSW, most recent report:
There were 170 COVID-19 deaths reported this week. Of these, 49 (29% ) had not received three doses of vaccine. Eleven deaths were in people aged under 65 years. Deaths may not have occurred in the week in which they were reported.
And how high is the vaccination level again?
Ahhh… so, basically you are talking out your arse and trying to prove your bias by completely not understanding the numbers.
So all your 'talking out your arse' bluster is exactly that, bluster.
Here's what the unvaxxed have 100% record of: 100% no vax injuries and fatalities.
I may dig back for the week it was 142 deaths and everyone of them juiced up.
@wajoma saidYour counting is way off.
So the seizure syrup is not 'many folds' effective. NSW health are bragging up their vax rate to about 90% so if the vax did nothing at all we'd expect 90% of the deaths to be unvaxxed.
So all your 'talking out your arse' bluster is exactly that, bluster.
Here's what the unvaxxed have 100% record of: 100% no vax injuries and fatalities.
I may dig back for the week it was 142 deaths and everyone of them juiced up.
You are drawing false conclusions.
Email the NSW and get them to explain it to you.
@shavixmir saidWhen 100% of the covid deaths in a given week are juiced there's no two ways of looking at that.
Your counting is way off.
You are drawing false conclusions.
Email the NSW and get them to explain it to you.
I know that if 90% are vaxxed then 90% of covid deaths should be unvaxxed is faulty logic, that's crediting the current snake oil with too much effectiveness. If I were selling a vax I'd hope to be able to pitch it as the horse face NZ prime minister and Biden pitched it, "If you take the juice you will not die"
If the vax did nothing we'd see the deaths veed versus unveed to reflect the 90% population veed rate. In which case we could reliably state: 'You not only wasted your time with the shot but you risked injury and unknown long term effects"
What do you think would be a reasonable number to expect for vax effectiveness?
Say 100 people die in a population 90% vaxxed, how many deaths do you expect to be unvaxxed? Probably not zero as happened in reality, in NSW recently.
@wajoma saidYou have to take into ages, etc.
When 100% of the covid deaths in a given week are juiced there's no two ways of looking at that.
I know that if 90% are vaxxed then 90% of covid deaths should be unvaxxed is faulty logic, that's crediting the current snake oil with too much effectiveness. If I were selling a vax I'd hope to be able to pitch it as the horse face NZ prime minister and Biden pitched it, "If ...[text shortened]... any deaths do you expect to be unvaxxed? Probably not zero as happened in reality, in NSW recently.
And not 100% of deaths were vaccinated (I just posted their recent stats).
Mail the NSW. Ask them. They’ll explain it to you.
Seriously. Between you and MB, it costs me too much energy to be bothered.
@shavixmir saidI can find the week I've posted it here before, it was a particular week, 142 dead, every one of them juiced.
You have to take into ages, etc.
And not 100% of deaths were vaccinated (I just posted their recent stats).
Mail the NSW. Ask them. They’ll explain it to you.
Seriously. Between you and MB, it costs me too much energy to be bothered.
The age thing is just your twisting, turning and slithering.
Now answer the question: 142 people died from covid in a state that boasts 90% vaccination, how many of the 142 would you expect to be unvaxxed if the vax is 'many folds' effective.
Go back to anal incest bluster shag doody, I'm getting secondhand embarrassment from your fumbling. Or do a sonhouse.
@wajoma saidYou just don't dare email them. Because you know the rightious bitch-slapping you're gonna get.
I can find the week I've posted it here before, it was a particular week, 142 dead, every one of them juiced.
The age thing is just your twisting, turning and slithering.
Now answer the question: 142 people died from covid in a state that boasts 90% vaccination, how many of the 142 would you expect to be unvaxxed if the vax is 'many folds' effective.
Go back to an ...[text shortened]... cest bluster shag doody, I'm getting secondhand embarrassment from your fumbling. Or do a sonhouse.
Stay down your rabbit hole of stupid, you ignorant kunt.
@shavixmir saidIf 90% off the population is vaxxed and 142 people died from covid, how many would you personally (i.e. shag doody for brains) expect to be unvaxxed, given your claims of 'many folds' effectiveness?
You just don't dare email them. Because you know the rightious bitch-slapping you're gonna get.
Stay down your rabbit hole of stupid, you ignorant kunt.
If I were hyping the hell out of it I might try 90% (high BS factor), and say something like "Out of those 142, 90% or 127 of them were unvaxxed mugs, sad to see them go but they were asking for it."
@wajoma saidEmail. Ask your question.
If 90% off the population is vaxxed and 142 people died from covid, how many would you personally (i.e. shag doody for brains) expect to be unvaxxed, given your claims of 'many folds' effectiveness?
If I were hyping the hell out of it I might try 90% (high BS factor), and say something like "Out of those 142, 90% or 127 of them were unvaxxed mugs, sad to see them go but they were asking for it."
Until then, shut up.
30 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidShag Doody thinks I should email NSW Health and ask them if any unvaxxed people have experienced vax injuries or death from the clot shot.
Email. Ask your question.
Until then, shut up.
@sonhouse saidDoes sonhouse even read the links he posts or is the attention span maxed out with the headline:
@Wajoma
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
But OF COURSE you will poo poo such papers BECAUSE they come from actual scientists who of course know nothing.
"The study looked at the reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Beijing households by face mask use (10). It found that face masks were 79% effective in preventing transmission, if they were used by all household members prior to symptoms occurring. The study did not look at the relative risk of different types of mask.
Who will ever forget the screams and moans of locked down Chinese people coming from their apartment balconies as drones flew overhead telling them to be quiet.
Who's the commie now comrade.