The dark side of the abortion battle

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Perhaps they shouldn't spread their legs in that case?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Apparently, so do many women.

I am completely in favor of asserting personal sovereignty, but when another human life has started within one's borders, the matter becomes complicated.

Never mind whether human life is "sacred" -- the question is whether human life has any value, legal or otherwise, in our society.

Even if governed by strange cults, the efforts of some to protect the fetus has a strong parallel with secular efforts to protect the innocent in tyrannical and murderous societies.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Women can also be misogynistic, and irresponsible as well.

@mchill said
While the pro lifers push feel good legislation such as abortion bans (which is not going to stop abortions at all) and pro choicers who shove Roe V Wade in everyone's face and stand on legality, both sides are overlooking a rather simple solution. That solution is to streamline and make more accessible the matching of those would be parents wishing to adopt children with thos ...[text shortened]...

https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/the-dark-sad-side-of-domestic-adoption/275370/

Further to your OP, it's strange to me that we have not been making better use of the internet for crowd-funded mutual support in general, given the success of Kickstarter and GoFundMe for relatively inconsequential projects.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Leaving aside your little ad-hominem above, I do note and respect your points.

How about this?: Women (and men) are free to have their tubes tied so that they can enjoy the pleasures of sex without the consequences, and without playing Russian roulette with the life of another.

Especially with the advances in reproductive technology that we enjoy these days, a woman could still later contribute equally to an embryo, or probably even have her tubes untied if she later decides to conceive and would rather carry the baby herself for the full and traditional experience.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Perhaps you could explain it in terms that a simpleton might understand?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

>> Note how Caesar-salad puts the burden of avoiding unwanted pregnancy completely upon women.

Women have the greater power of procreation, so why shouldn't they be the ones to nip things in the bud?

>> After all, men are more likely to push women into sex than the other way around.

Perhaps women should consider being less compliant.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

May I ask how you deal with these treacherous times where only men and never women are on the prowl?

Have you yourself given up the hunt, or have you become the chaste abbess of a remote convent?