Originally posted by kmax87This is no issue here.
My understanding is that given the overwhelming evidence in support of tobacco smoke being a health hazard, insurers are less interested in providing cover for those workplaces who still insist on lighting up. I don't know how it works oversees but over here in Australia, compensation lawyers are pretty good at getting decisions in favour of clients who feel ...[text shortened]... nsurance than any interest by hoteliers in upholding the health interests of the workforce.
Originally posted by eamon oWhen I say that everyone is in agreement, I was referring to the scientific facts regarding the dangers of smoking and not public opinion. There is ZERO reason for smoking in terms of it being beneficial to you. In addition, it kills you......slowly, in fact.
by your reasoning, since every one is not in agreement, just put up with it