- Joined
- 25 Nov 21
- Moves
- 1990
13 Jan 22
@suzianne saidAre you gonna falsely accuse me of lying and make false statements about my health from a position of complete ignorance?
Are you gonna call me a slut nine more times?
I was giving you a taste of your own medicine. Didn’t like it much, did you?
And I’m sure you’ve criticized left-wing pervs in politics ‘cause your assessment of someone isn’t wholly based on their politics, right?
13 Jan 22
@suzianne saidOf course they exist, what I am saying is that a gay does not label ( and we all know the importance of labels, right? ) themselves Cisgender. True or not.
Imagine people expressing themselves honestly, instead of how YOU want to label them.
And yes, you are wrong. Cisgender lesbians exist. Of course. Didn't you get the part about cisgender having nothing to do with sexual preference?
13 Jan 22
@suzianne saidIt puzzles me that the left is openly offensive ( as you to me ) to different opinions that interfere with their sensitivities, yet seem defensive and hurt when offense is returned. I hope never to be offensive to you except I am not concerned about my ideologies being different to yours.
Are you gonna call me a slut nine more times?
BTW The term slut used out of context is not appropriate, in my opinion. But note that there are plenty of people that happily call themselves sluts.
- Joined
- 25 Nov 21
- Moves
- 1990
13 Jan 22
@suzianne saidI would add that I was drunk as hell when I did that and was pissed at you for implying I was a liar and trashing something I accomplished all because it interfered with your “Pompeo is lying” narrative.
Are you gonna call me a slut nine more times?
But yeah, I was wrong to do that and apologize for it.
But you weren’t drunk as hell when you falsely implied I was lying and when you trashed and lied about me. Nor did it occur to you to apologize.
I guess that’s how we’re different. It’s not my nature to be like that.
13 Jan 22
@eladar saidWhy do you need unnecessary assumptions about gender? It is assigned at birth without any information about chromosomes or input from scientists.
Neccessary? Of course not, nothing is needed.
But if you want to stick with fact and not opinion, then stick with science. Stick with chromosomes.
@wildgrass saidTell me, what percentage of people are assigned sex Male due to having male genitalia do not have xy chromosomes.
Why do you need unnecessary assumptions about gender? It is assigned at birth without any information about chromosomes or input from scientists.
13 Jan 22
@eladar saidI don't know. It seems irrelevant to the discussion. Chromosomes are not used for sex determination, and it undermines your point to have to assume sex/gender based on chromosomes.
Tell me, what percentage of people are assigned sex Male due to having male genitalia do not have xy chromosomes.
All of which begs the question: If you're bringing up chromosomes and saying that assumptions of chromosomal data are needed to infer gender/sex, then why use chromosomes at all?
13 Jan 22
@wildgrass saidThat is the problem, you do not know.
I don't know. It seems irrelevant to the discussion. Chromosomes are not used for sex determination, and it undermines your point to have to assume sex/gender based on chromosomes.
All of which begs the question: If you're bringing up chromosomes and saying that assumptions of chromosomal data are needed to infer gender/sex, then why use chromosomes at all?
Get educated.