Trump had himself shot conspiracy theory

@Metal-Brain said
What is your source of information?

@wildgrass

The picture of a bullet whizzing by Donald Trump’s head was using a camera that shoots 30 frames per second. Prove that is as unlikely as you claim.

@Metal-Brain said
@wildgrass

The picture of a bullet whizzing by Donald Trump’s head was using a camera that shoots 30 frames per second. Prove that is as unlikely as you claim.

Here are the competing narratives:

1) A kid eluded over 100 members of law enforcement to stake a visible position on a nearby roof and shoot at Trump, drawing blood but not causing a wound, an extremely unlikely photo of the bullet is the only evidence trump was shot at, randomly creating the perfect flag backdrop for trump to pose for even more patriotic photos.

2) A severe narcissist reality TV star with a floundering campaign and little left to lose stages an event to garner sympathy for him, generate significant buzz heading into the convention, and distract from his dense associations with one of the worst criminals the world has seen in awhile.

#2 seems like a far more likely explanation for what happened on that day.

@wildgrass said
Extremely unlikely and requiring special equipment was the opinion of the photographer who took the photo, and other photographers who have attempted to capture such things on purpose.

Combined with all the other shenanigans - there was no bullet wound, Trump stopped and posed for photos, this was counter snipers only appearance ever, law enforcement knew Crooks was on roof with gun - this presents itself as a staged event.

@wildgrass said
Here are the competing narratives:

1) A kid eluded over 100 members of law enforcement to stake a visible position on a nearby roof and shoot at Trump, drawing blood but not causing a wound, an extremely unlikely photo of the bullet is the only evidence trump was shot at, randomly creating the perfect flag backdrop for trump to pose for even more patriotic photos.

2) ...[text shortened]... ld has seen in awhile.

#2 seems like a far more likely explanation for what happened on that day.

@Metal-Brain said
What is your source of information?

@wildgrass said
Posted earlier. I guess you didn't read.

@Metal-Brain said
You did not. Not on the last couple of pages.
I think you are making it up.

@wildgrass said
https://nypost.com/2024/07/16/us-news/ny-times-photojournalist-doug-mills-recalls-capturing-1-in-a-million-image-of-bullet-whizzing-by-trump-at-pa-rally

@Metal-Brain said
I already read that. It proves nothing you claimed.
You are putting forth conspiracy theories without any proof of what you are claiming. What are the odds of him having that kind of camera? Do you even know? Nobody could have that kind of camera during a major historical political event?
You are full of crap!

@wildgrass said
Nah man. His ear wasnt injured. That is obvious from recent photos of Trump.

Let's imagine the shot that was fired at JFK missed, but then afterwards he walked around saying he was shot and brains splattered everywhere. Where's the conspiracy?

@Metal-Brain said
Show me the recent photos if they exist.

@wildgrass said
This is from today. He evasively says he's just a really fast healer.

https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1821625501741355112

And here he was at the nabj interview, on July 31st, just 10 days after "being shot". Zero sign of a scratch.

https://x.com/DarickR/status/1819063912412991725

He's a fast healer? Come on now.

Don't you think it's weird that the first t ...[text shortened]... photos with his head in the open for an extended time? What absurdity to think this was not staged.

@Metal-Brain said
Show me the close up. You are being silly. You have no evidence.
You claiming he was not shot when 3 people behind him were is ridiculous.
Are you going to deny it is a conspiracy theory again? Go ahead and say that again to make it clear how stupid you are. Deny it is a conspiracy theory again so people can have a good laugh at your expense.

You are a conspiracy theorist.