Victimless Crimes

@zahlanzi said
Absolutely, i never meant free agent prostitutes to be magically exempt from regulations.

Then we agree. I'm not against registered prostitutes, I oppose legalization of unregulated prostitution.

@zahlanzi said
i never meant free agent prostitutes to be magically exempt from regulations.

zahlooney bamboozle contradicts himself in a matter of half a sentence.

One can only marvel what control freakism he has in mind and how he'd like to stick his nose into other peoples business with his regulation of 'free agents'. He's so curious about two people having sex, he wants questions asked, forms filled out, goobermint agents, licenses doled out and revoked, whole buratcracies created to check up on two people having sex, a special device to measure the bed has the required support quotient, oh the rules and regulations to be imposed on a one time illegal business, but apart from the rules, the money that can be extracted by the parasites. Making the goobermint a literal pimp, and the prostitute a reluctant pimp supporter.

@vivify said
Then we agree. I'm not against registered prostitutes, I oppose legalization of unregulated prostitution.

Another sick individual wanting to know what goes on between two consenting adults behind closed doors. Isn't there enough porno on the internet to satisfy you.

@vivify said
Then we agree. I'm not against registered prostitutes, I oppose legalization of unregulated prostitution.

Sure, but that would be like allowing anyone with an open flame to bake cookies and sell them even though they bake next to rat droppings and asbestos walls

@zahlanzi said
Sure, but that would be like allowing anyone with an open flame to bake cookies and sell them even though they bake next to rat droppings and asbestos walls

Earlier you said:

"That's why it needs to be legal. Fully."

This is what I disagreed with. It can't just be "fully" legal, there has to be limits like registration.

@vivify said
Earlier you said:

"That's why it needs to be legal. Fully."

This is what I disagreed with. It can't just be "fully" legal, there has to be limits like registration.

That's true of anything 😀 Nothing is fully legal in this interpretation. Driving isn't fully legal 😀 You cannot drive while drunk, underage, without permit. I don't think anyone answers no when asked if driving is fully legal? It doesn't actually matter though, we are aligned in opinion.

@vivify said
Earlier you said:

"That's why it needs to be legal. Fully."

This is what I disagreed with. It can't just be "fully" legal, there has to be limits like registration.

You ever noticed the similarity between telling lies and making regulations. You tell one lie, you need five more lies to cover the first one, then five more lies for each of those lies. Same with your stupid rules and regulations, first problem with regulating registration is you need to write a book on what it defines a prostitute, how about part time, or casual, or accidental, what constitutes payment, can goods be exchanged instead of money, what goods, how are they valued, on and on and on the lies pile up.

And after the army of parasitical control freaks writing their rules and regs comes another army of unproductive parasitical bureaurats to police the new rules and regs.

@zahlanzi said
That's true of anything 😀 Nothing is fully legal in this interpretation. Driving isn't fully legal 😀 You cannot drive while drunk, underage, without permit. I don't think anyone answers no when asked if driving is fully legal? It doesn't actually matter though, we are aligned in opinion.

FFS zahlooney bamboozle wants the cops to breath test prostitutes now, does his control freakism know no bounds.