Virginia: Biden vote count incorrect

@wildgrass said
That's not the trump narrative.

Nor do these results suggest anything that questions the reliability of the outcome.

Because they eventually caught it....2 years later?
Are you fargin kidding me??????

What drugs are you taking, because I want some.

@sh76 said
I think the 2020 election was clearly legitimately won by Biden.

Still, that a mistake of 4,000 votes was made in one county does not inspire confidence in the system. It's not enough to question the results of the election, but it certainly doesn't help.

It's so interesting how people become emotional and deliberately obtuse on this issue.

"I think the 2020 election was clearly legitimately won by Biden. '

You see no problem with drop boxes, absentee ballots corrected in less than a second, signature verification approved at a rate of 3 per second, judges making election decisions when the power rests solely with the state legislature, boarding polling station windows, destroying election results that are required to be held for seven years, stopping vote counting in 5 (Ithink) states?

@sh76 said
Even let's say.

It certainly doesn't help the narrative that the election system is foolproof.

It's like if Michael Phelps wins a gold medal but then they find out years later using more sophisticated equipment that the margin of victory was 0.0001 second better than they thought.

In both the race and the election, that level of precision is overkill.

@metal-brain said
Because they eventually caught it....2 years later?
Are you fargin kidding me??????

What drugs are you taking, because I want some.

You mean questions the outcome, not the reliability of the outcome. 4000 votes questions the reliability. Just because 4000 votes did not affect the outcome of this specific election does not mean it cannot happen with another.

This example erodes confidence in elections. It supports healthy skepticism.

@wildgrass said
That's not the trump narrative.

Nor do these results suggest anything that questions the reliability of the outcome.

You mean questions the outcome, not the reliability of the outcome. 4000 votes questions the reliability. Just because 4000 votes did not affect the outcome of this specific election does not mean it cannot happen with another.

This example erodes confidence in elections. It supports healthy skepticism.

@wildgrass said
It's like if Michael Phelps wins a gold medal but then they find out years later using more sophisticated equipment that the margin of victory was 0.0001 second better than they thought.

In both the race and the election, that level of precision is overkill.

4,000 in one county is hardly comparable to 0.0001 second.

@sh76 said
4,000 in one county is hardly comparable to 0.0001 second.

Thts the number misreported, not the directionality. I think Biden only picked up a few hundred overall, while winning the state by 450,000.

Nothing was rigged.