28 May 06
Originally posted by stockenWell, first off, someone made the claim that there are few studies on pornography and their apparent effect on making a person want to do it more. I was displaying that with a few keystrokes and a click of a button I could find several. I thought that was obvious 🙂
This is like when hardrock music was blamed for suicides and young adolescent boys peppering innocent people at that school, or when violent movies gets blamed for excessive street violence.
The problem is in every single case (I dare say that) much bigger than from where those kids got their influences.
There is no definite connection between the porn ...[text shortened]... hurt anyone else no matter how much one might want to at times (and live accordingly).
Secondly there are definite connections between viewing porn and acting out on those fantasies. Nearly every single study I cited made that connection very clearly. Just because not EVERYONE acts out on those urges doesn't mean that they don't exist. In fact, every single website I cited mentioned that too, and it really only takes 2 brain cells to understand.
Also, I sure am glad that you too can find information on google. That makes you smarter than some in this crowd (though not smart enough to get the meaning of my post, hehe).
On a personal note, I wholeheartedly believe that pornography is addictive. I know I'll never convince anybody because nobody here can change their minds, and it was never my desire to do so. To sum things up, understand my post before you try and refute it. Thanks.
28 May 06
Originally posted by NargagunaHe isn't defending child pornography. Read his post again, he is asking a tough question to spark a debate.
This must be the most illiterate post ever; not a line without glaring mistakes in both grammar and syntax.
This person would be better advised to study correct English usage than to spend his time downloading 'child porn' or defending that pastime.
I love your second argument, but only because it makes you look like an idiot. I glanced over his post again and found relatively few errors. So, not only does he not make a grammar or syntax error in every sentence like you say, but he obviously doesn't spend his time downloading child porn or defending it, based on the tone of his argument.
My diagnosis is that you obviously can't read.
28 May 06
Originally posted by DraxusLooks as though you could do with some lessons in English yourself if you cannot see what is wrong with the original post. I counted 10 errors in 6 lines.
He isn't defending child pornography. Read his post again, he is asking a tough question to spark a debate.
I love your second argument, but only because it makes you look like an idiot. I glanced over his post again and found relatively few errors. So, not only does he not make a grammar or syntax error in every sentence like you say, but he obviously ...[text shortened]... ding it, based on the tone of his argument.
My diagnosis is that you obviously can't read.
But perhaps English is not your native language?
28 May 06
1 edit
Originally posted by Brother Edwinthis guy is a paedophile
I understand the makers of it might be wrong and cause children to be abused or whatever, fair enough, imprison them.
However as for the people who own download it and own it, why is it considerd wrong or more importantly warrants imprisionment?
1)They are not hurting anyone.
2)Surley its better they exorcise there lust over a computer rath ...[text shortened]... paid money for with money they earnt, why should the FBI have a say in what they can use it for.
ban him for the health of this forum
28 May 06
Originally posted by Brother EdwinOne simple answer: Its bad because it continues to support the concept of child porn in that it continues to generate money for the pornographers so the cycle goes on. How would you feel if you bought some child porn video only to find it was YOUR daughter or son who was being raped?
I understand the makers of it might be wrong and cause children to be abused or whatever, fair enough, imprison them.
However as for the people who own download it and own it, why is it considerd wrong or more importantly warrants imprisionment?
1)They are not hurting anyone.
2)Surley its better they exorcise there lust over a computer rath ...[text shortened]... paid money for with money they earnt, why should the FBI have a say in what they can use it for.
29 May 06
Originally posted by Brother EdwinHas anyone every invited their friends over and said, "Hey, want to see the new addition to my porn collection?", and show kiddie porn and not get the crap beat out of them?
3)They might not nescceraly be phedophiles anyway. They might have it to add viarity to there collection or might just have it out of intrest.
29 May 06
Originally posted by sonhouseAlot of the children dipicted in child porn are victums of their fathers.
One simple answer: Its bad because it continues to support the concept of child porn in that it continues to generate money for the pornographers so the cycle goes on. How would you feel if you bought some child porn video only to find it was YOUR daughter or son who was being raped?