What's so bad about owning child porn anyway?

Originally posted by DreamlaX
Yeah, in NZ you allowed to [b]have sex before you're allowed to look at it. Sense make lots of.[/b]

Isn't that only with sheep though?

Originally posted by mokko
Alot of the children dipicted in child porn are victums of their fathers.

has this ever been proved people who view or depict child porn need to be rounded up and sent to some desolate place for the term of their natural life , never to have access to computers or any form of technology and most of all never to see a child ever again

Originally posted by boarman
has this ever been proved people who view or depict child porn need to be rounded up and sent to some desolate place for the term of their natural life , never to have access to computers or any form of technology and most of all never to see a child ever again

That's too kind. Flay them alive while cauterizing the wounds. Once the limbs have been removed, suffocate them with a piece of skin off of their own leg. This is after, of course, mutilating their genitals. But that's my own opinion. And you don't even want to know what I would do to a child molester.

Originally posted by slappy115
And you don't even want to know what I would do to a child molester.

why? Is it sick, twisted, depraved, cruel and something you're ashamed of?

Originally posted by aging blitzer
why? Is it sick, twisted, depraved, cruel and something you're ashamed of?

No, I'm not ashamed of it at all. I'm not sure what I'd do but it would be not be nice.

Originally posted by boarman
has this ever been proved people who view or depict child porn need to be rounded up and sent to some desolate place for the term of their natural life , never to have access to computers or any form of technology and most of all never to see a child ever again

You mention view and depict as being the same thing.

Is it a persons fault if they are attracted to children of a certan age and choose to look at porn on the internent hurting nobody rather than actualy going out and practercsing it?

Originally posted by Draxus
Typing "addicting effects of pornography" into google was easy. Certainely it was something you could have done.

http://mentalhealthlibrary.info/library/porn/pornlds/pornldsauthor/links/victorcline/porneffect.htm

Is the first site that looked promising. It is quite lengthy, but it mentions that "acting out sexualy" is a tendency that people who view p ...[text shortened]... fecting the human mind is certainly sparse," is not a true statement. Enjoy the links.

Ha you obviously don't know squat about this conterversial subject, or this "proven fact" you speak of, because you've been searching Google for the very foundation of which your "well known proven fact" rests, after you stated it.

I said in a previous post that "!scientific data! on the subject of pornography affecting the human mind is certainly sparse." You have still not shown this to be untrue. All you have shown me were two links. One of them is about pornography affecting children, which is an entirely different case all together. The other is good, which explains the well known professor's (Victor Cline) anecdotal evidence and thesis on pornography's effect on the mind.

Do you not the differnce between anecdotal evidence and scientific evidence?

I can show you a bunch of links with professors and ufo witnesses stating that aliens exist, and maybe they do, but its not a proven scientific fact just because they say so.

Maybe you should know; it does not mean that something is a well known proven fact just because a scientist does research on that something and then forms a conclusion on that something. There usually has to be agreement among a majority of the scientists that have done research on the subject for that something to be accepted as true in the scientific community. This is especially true in psychology.

But is it a "proven fact" within the scientific community that "pornography has such an effect on the mind of the viewer that the viewer will try to re-enact those situations in real life" as you stated? Well then, if it is what is the scientific psychological term for this type of mental, cerebral mind state that exists or had existed in the minds of hundreds of millions of ordinary people.

Good luck surfing Google for the answer.

Originally posted by jmarks
Good luck surfing Google for the answer.

I think many people do that because they always reference webpages. Has anyone ever heard of a book?

Originally posted by slappy115
I think many people do that because they always reference webpages. Has anyone ever heard of a book?

Yeah. I've heard of books.

This police man came up to me when I was driving without a seatbelt and said: "You're booked."

I don't like books.

Originally posted by jmarks
Ha you obviously don't know squat about this conterversial subject, or this "proven fact" you speak of, because you've been searching Google for the very foundation of which your "well known proven fact" rests, after you stated it.

I said in a previous post that "!scientific data! on the subject of pornography affecting the human mind is certainly sparse. ...[text shortened]... dreds of millions of ordinary people.

Good luck surfing Google for the answer.

I didn't even read your post, but I can assume it is a bunch of evidence about how knowledgable you are about the subject. No reason to read it really.

You made the claim that there are few studies about the addictive effects of pornography. With a few keystrokes I proved you wrong, even if I only spent the time to post two links out of several.

Really, I am glad you know so much. None of it is worth me actually reading though.

Originally posted by Draxus
Well, first off, someone made the claim that there are few studies on pornography and their apparent effect on making a person want to do it more. I was displaying that with a few keystrokes and a click of a button I could find several. I thought that was obvious 🙂

Secondly there are definite connections between viewing porn and acting out on those fant ...[text shortened]... desire to do so. To sum things up, understand my post before you try and refute it. Thanks.

I didn't claim that there has been few studies on...blahblah

There's probably been studies on why a giraffe cant give head. But I don't give a dam.

I said there was little scientific evidence you dumbass. But I guess you don't know the difference between a study and scientific evidence do you. Oh well.

But at least now I know that you not only manage to state blatantly false facts in your posts but you manage to quote dishonestly too.

Originally posted by jmarks
I didn't claim that there has been few studies on...blahblah

There's probably been studies on why a giraffe cant give head. But I don't give a dam.

I said there was little scientific evidence you dumbass. But I guess you don't know the difference between a study and scientific evidence do you. Oh well.

But at least now I know that you not only manage to state blatantly false facts in your posts but you manage to quote dishonestly too.

What is the difference between a study and scientific evidence?

Originally posted by slappy115
I think many people do that because they always reference webpages. Has anyone ever heard of a book?

It's easier for both parties to copy-paste links which can then be easily viewed than to laboriously write out references for books which must then be located in some library (if the library happens to have that one, anyway).

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
What is the difference between a study and scientific evidence?

In such a context, it's the same between a tree and the forest.

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
It's easier for both parties to copy-paste links which can then be easily viewed than to laboriously write out references for books which must then be located in some library (if the library happens to have that one, anyway).

True. But is the internet site reliable? You could say that this site is reliable because it agrees with the information in my textbook.