Originally posted by WajomaOf course it didn't, because it's not relevant. We dealt with this a fortnight ago. I gave you a figure off the top of my head, you weren't happy,. what do you want from me? The question is, is man the primary cause of modern climate change. All the evidence posted says yes. End of f'ing story.
...and you know what, the test still didn't say how much I heated up the planet by.
Originally posted by SpastiGov"...more than whining excuses..." -wittywonka
That's not proof!! It's just another random alarmist web link that repeats the same tired old story.
"...That's not proof!! It's just another random alarmist web link that repeats the same tired old story. -SpastiGov
Nothing more needed here. Read for yourself. I'll be waiting for something better than that.
"Here's proof the whole thing is a hyped up hoax to frighten the gullible, like yourself..."
Will you not listen to me, here? Or will you again use your now perfected talent of intentional ignorance?
Just because 9/11 occurred doesn't mean I'm scared of flying. That doesn't mean I won't play things smart, i.e., staying alert.
Just because global warming is occurring doesn't mean I'm trembling in my bed. That doesn't mean I won't play things smart.
I will not repeat myself on this matter again. If you choose to be so intentionally ignorant yet again, then enjoy yourself.
If you listen very, very carefully, you can sorta hear the free-market right-wingers of America coming to the uncomfortable realization that they have really, really backed the wrong horse in the global warming debate. A few months back Jonah Goldberg wrote a column which basically went "Uh, maybe global warming is occurring, but doing anything about it will cost us too much money." Until now they've been trying to make this argument - "global warming is a lie!" so that they won't have to make that one. But they can't get away with that for much longer.
Originally posted by WajomaWhat, that your insistence on trying to make an average value turn into an individual value has no relevance to the truth or lack of truth in the statement "Man is the primary cause of the current global warming, above and beyond any natural effect".
Nice going, that's what I say too
How is that internally consistent with what you're saying?
To your right is the plot, and to your left, is you losing it.