139d
@no1marauder saidMs. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."
Cooper isn't "innocent"; he got his DNA tests and his DNA was all over the crime scene. https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/independent-review-finds-kevin-cooper-guilt-conclusive-in-1983-slayings/
" The results of this testing established a match between Kevin Cooper's DNA and that found on the evidence from the murder scene. In scientific terms, the match ...[text shortened]... .gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bill-lockyer-submits-final-dna-testing-results-court-kevin
139d
@Metal-Brain saidLocal DA's aren't "underlings" of the State Attorney Generals; they are not under the authority of the State Department of Justice but have their own separate, Constitutional powers.
Once again, anything her underlings do is never her fault and whenever her underlings do anything right she is eager to take credit. Your dishonesty is obvious to anyone non partisan. Only other partisan creatures like yourself are your cheerleaders.
This is Political Science 101.
@Metal-Brain saidThat may well have been an incorrect decision on her part, but the fact remains that the DNA testing was eventually done and far from showing Cooper's innocence it is strongly probative of his guilt.
Ms. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."
He remains in prison with his attorneys claiming the DNA evidence was "planted".
139d
@no1marauder
There is plenty of dirt to dig up on Kamala. All Trump has to do is read the books Amazon removed.
https://odysee.com/@KimIversen:d/amazon-removes-books-critical-of-kamala:a
Prison Slavery Kamala cannot win. Her underlings defended the prison labor status quo. Not surprising considering she has an Irish ancestor who owned slaves.
139d
@Metal-Brain saidBoy, you sound more desperate with every post.
@no1marauder
There is plenty of dirt to dig up on Kamala. All Trump has to do is read the books Amazon removed.
https://odysee.com/@KimIversen:d/amazon-removes-books-critical-of-kamala:a
Prison Slavery Kamala cannot win. Her underlings defended the prison labor status quo. Not surprising considering she has an Irish ancestor who owned slaves.
I'm sorry, but the "Kamala favors slavery" trope isn't going to work.
139d
@no1marauder saidYes it does and you know it.
Boy, you sound more desperate with every post.
I'm sorry, but the "Kamala favors slavery" trope isn't going to work.
Kamala's underlings argued the prison labor status quo should be upheld.
That is a fact. Now you are on the defense claiming her underlings were rogue people beyond her control.
She is the overseer. You want a double standard of no accountability of the overseer. Yet if anything positive happens under her watch she deserves all the credit for it? None of the blame, all of the credit. A clear double standard. Obvious BS.
139d
@Metal-Brain saidThey weren't "beyond her control"; your own linked articles show that she "controlled" them by telling them to stop making such an argument as soon as she was aware they were doing so.
Yes it does and you know it.
Kamala's underlings argued the prison labor status quo should be upheld.
That is a fact. Now you are on the defense claiming her underlings were rogue people beyond her control.
She is the overseer. You want a double standard of no accountability of the overseer. Yet if anything positive happens under her watch she deserves all the credit for it? None of the blame, all of the credit. A clear double standard. Obvious BS.
In any event, I doubt the type of independent, swing voters that will eventually decide the election really have much of a problem with a program where prisoners get good time credit for doing socially useful work like fighting fires.
You still predicting that the Democratic Convention won't nominate Harris?
139d
@no1marauder
"You still predicting that the Democratic Convention won't nominate Harris?"
Yes, because she cannot win. Even democrats rejected her after Tulsi exposed her corruption at the primary debates. That corruption has not gone away. Amazon can remove all the books they want. They are still available.
It is not too late though. She does not have the nomination yet. The delegates can vote for someone else. Rumor is Obama wants the gay mayor Pete. Democrats do not have to settle for corrupt Kamala, they can pick anyone they want. But they have to become huge hypocrites to do it.
Do you support becoming huge hypocrites to beat Trump?
If the delegates did that would you protest or fall in line?
139d
@no1marauder saidSo they were rogue and then Kamala controlled them after they screwed everything up. Isn't she supposed to control her underlings before they screw up?
They weren't "beyond her control"; your own linked articles show that she "controlled" them by telling them to stop making such an argument as soon as she was aware they were doing so.
In any event, I doubt the type of independent, swing voters that will eventually decide the election really have much of a problem with a program where prisoners get good time credit for ...[text shortened]... k like fighting fires.
You still predicting that the Democratic Convention won't nominate Harris?
Her underlings did exactly what she wanted them to. Then when she was exposed she distanced herself from her own office. Pathetic.
Corrupt Kamala is the horse you are betting on. I am betting against her. She dropped out of the democrat primary for a reason. She had no retort. She is a losing horse. She cannot get the votes of enough independents. But you know that. You can stop pretending now.
139d
@Metal-Brain saidObama endorsed Harris a few days ago.
@no1marauder
"You still predicting that the Democratic Convention won't nominate Harris?"
Yes, because she cannot win. Even democrats rejected her after Tulsi exposed her corruption at the primary debates. That corruption has not gone away. Amazon can remove all the books they want. They are still available.
It is not too late though. She does not have the nominati ...[text shortened]... ecoming huge hypocrites to beat Trump?
If the delegates did that would you protest or fall in line?
Must not have made it to zerohedge or Kim Iversen.
139d
@Metal-Brain saidThree quality polls out since last Thursday have her ahead or tied with Trump in the 5 way race. https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls/president/general-election
So they were rogue and then Kamala controlled them after they screwed everything up. Isn't she supposed to control her underlings before they screw up?
Her underlings did exactly what she wanted them to. Then when she was exposed she distanced herself from her own office. Pathetic.
Corrupt Kamala is the horse you are betting on. I am betting against her. She dropped ...[text shortened]... se. She cannot get the votes of enough independents. But you know that. You can stop pretending now.
139d
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidShe will go in with no issues at all Obama has now given her his endorsement so it is pretty much a done deal. Just a matter of formalizing it. You little buggers are getting scared now it appears! 🙂
@no1marauder
"You still predicting that the Democratic Convention won't nominate Harris?"
Yes, because she cannot win. Even democrats rejected her after Tulsi exposed her corruption at the primary debates. That corruption has not gone away. Amazon can remove all the books they want. They are still available.
It is not too late though. She does not have the nominati ...[text shortened]... ecoming huge hypocrites to beat Trump?
If the delegates did that would you protest or fall in line?
-VR
139d
@no1marauder saidI know. What took so long?
Obama endorsed Harris a few days ago.
Must not have made it to zerohedge or Kim Iversen.
Did he have a gay affair with Pete?
139d
@Very-Rusty saidhttps://modernity.news/2024/07/28/biden-endorsed-harris-immediately-on-dropping-out-as-a-f-you-to-obama-report/
She will go in with no issues at all Obama has now given her his endorsement so it is pretty much a done deal. Just a matter of formalizing it. You little buggers are getting scared now it appears! 🙂
-VR