why is research so difficult?

@wajoma said
How, How, How.

Show your workings, I've shown mine even going to the trouble of explaining percentages to kewpie.

I took the total of people that have died from wuflu in NZ in the 0-59 year old group = 460, then the the 111 not fully vaxxed, which are the unvaxxed and soothfast would like to include in this number those that have received one jab which further reduces th ...[text shortened]... t say 'that study' copy and paste the relevant info, you steaming pile of dog shyte wasting my time.

Did you read the study? It's in the abstract.

@wajoma said
Now to deal with the late edit.
Here's wildgrass' quote:

"I'm sure it's been addressed in prior debate topics. Randomized controlled trials in the US showed '20-50 fold' lower risk of hospitalizations and death in vaxxed vs controls."

She was talking about clotshot efficacy and came up with the number '20-50 fold' (which is still unclear what that is actually mea ...[text shortened]... n having to explain percentages to kewpie.

As it happens '20-50 fold' isn't even in the ballpark.

Exactly not the spread of the virus but the outcomes of the vaxed infected compared to the non vaxed infected
No one has argued that the vax is a way of avoiding infection completely for most people for a long long time, but if it means your less likely to be hospitalised or cremated then the vaxxxers win the argument against the anti vaxxers by a country mile