04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37Nothing was left out that was relevant to your false claim that "I did not say that Sushill was being racist". But here's the whole post:
No1maurauder : How about you cut and paste what I actually said, word for word, then make this post again. I AM GIVING YOU THIS ONE CHANCE. If you do not, then I'm sorry, you don't get to ask me anything.
Thanks 🙂
Oh, allright, so its okay for me to be REMINDED of this, every time I see a post by this person, who had this avatar, and I have to remember that the pic, is telling me, that he should be chained, because of his race and because he is inferior. Okay, I get it now.
Racism = Black man in chains (check)
Racism = Black man in chains because of his Race (check)
Racism = Black man in chains because of his Race because he's inferior (check)
no1: You did most certainly say that Sushill was being racist; in fact, you said it repeatedly.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by no1marauderPlease, I beg you, don't disappoint me. I've stated a couple of times, that I considered you intellectually smarter than me.
Nothing was left out that was relevant to your false claim that "I did not say that Sushill was being racist". But here's the whole post:
Oh, allright, so its okay for me to be REMINDED of this, every time I see a post by this person, who had this avatar, and I have to remember that the pic, is telling me, that he should be chained, because of his rac ...[text shortened]... : You did most certainly say that Sushill was being racist; in fact, you said it repeatedly.
What you've shown to me, is that I'm repeating what the previous poster, before I said this, who was telling me about what Racism is, what his definition of Racism was. I do not see where I have said, Sushill was a racist.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37You skipped me again.
Please, I beg you, don't disappoint me. I've stated a couple of times, that I considered you intellectually smarter than me.
What you've shown to me, is that I'm repeating what the previous poster, before I said this, who was telling me about what Racism is, what his definition of Racism was. I do not see where I have said, Sushill was a racist.
P-
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by PhlabibitIf I apologised publicly and privately to Sushill that I did not PM him, before sending Feedback, what is that telling you?
Did you ask before it was removed?
P-
What it is saying is this, quite simply, and it can't get any more simple than this : I did not PM Sushill, before sending Feedback.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37Ok.
If I apologised publicly and privately to Sushill that I did not PM him, before sending Feedback, what is that telling you?
What it is saying is this, quite simply, and it can't get any more simple than this : I did not PM Sushill, before sending Feedback.
My view is you might have got more info.
Thank you for spending some time with me clearing things up.
P-
04 Jun 09
1 edit
Originally posted by Elamef37You're being dishonest. You said "I did not say that Sushill was being racist". But you clearly imputed racist beliefs to Sushill because of his avatar. One who has racist beliefs is a racist by definition. Your attempts at hair splitting are BS.
Please, I beg you, don't disappoint me. I've stated a couple of times, that I considered you intellectually smarter than me.
What you've shown to me, is that I'm repeating what the previous poster, before I said this, who was telling me about what Racism is, what his definition of Racism was. I do not see where I have said, Sushill was a racist.
One more time: every time I see a post by this person [Sushill], who had this avatar, and I have to remember that the pic, is telling me, that he should be chained, because of his race and because he is inferior
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37No, I don't jump to conclusions.
Perhaps you see that post, as though I"m screaming, that Sushill is a racist? 😕
Everything I've talked about with you is based on reading and posting... and thinking about the new precedent that has been set by this decision.
P-
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by no1marauderYou do realise, I have to actually see a post of his...to see that pic...to be reminded....
You're being dishonest. You said "I did not say that Sushill was being racist". But you clearly imputed racist beliefs to Sushill because of his avatar. One who has racist beliefs is a racist by definition. Your attempts at hair splitting are BS.
One more time: every time I see a post by this person [Sushill], who had this avatar, and I hav ...[text shortened]... pic, is telling me, that he should be chained, because of his race and because he is inferior
I have only seen that pic as Sushill's avatar....
I have not attributed any racist beliefs to Sushill. I did however, found racist in nature and offensive, seeing a black man in chains. It just happened to be Sushill's avatar.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Red NightThat is the most illogical argument I have ever come across. The swastika isn't known for William's book. The image of kunte kinte in chains is known for being in the show "roots." See the difference?
Context, context, context...
William Shirer can put a swastika on the cover of his book and no one will complain.
Carry that same swastika through the streets of Jerusalem and there will be trouble.
No, you probably don't see much except your own posts.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37tap tap.
You do realise, I have to actually see a post of his...to see that pic...to be reminded....
I have only seen that pic as Sushill's avatar....
I have not attributed any racist beliefs to Sushill. I did however, found racist in nature and offensive, seeing a black man in chains. It just happened to be Sushill's avatar.