04 Jun 09
Originally posted by tomtom232The picture of kunta kinte or toby or lavaar burton on the cover of the DVD for roots is not offensive.
That is the most illogical argument I have ever come across. The swastika isn't known for William's book. The image of kunte kinte in chains is known for being in the show "roots." See the difference?
No, you probably don't see much except your own posts.
If the KKK carried the picture down the streets of Beverly Hills it woud cause quite a stir.
See the difference?
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Red NightSushill isn't the KKK, get it?
The picture of kunta kinte or toby or lavaar burton on the cover of the DVD for roots is not offensive.
If the KKK carried the picture down the streets of Beverly Hills it woud cause quite a stir.
See the difference?
Besides if the KKK marched down the street with that image it doesn't make the image itself offensive. The fact that the KKK are degrading a great symbol would be the offense not the symbol itself, get it?
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by tomtom232So you feel the KKK degrades a great symbol when they carry the swastika?
Sushill isn't the KKK, get it?
Besides if the KKK marched down the street with that image it doesn't make the image itself offensive. The fact that the KKK are degrading a great symbol would be the offense not the symbol itself, get it?
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Red NightYou aren't worth arguing with. It is obvious to everyone that I did not say that.
So you feel the KKK degrades a great symbol when they carry the swastika?
The swastika was degraded a long time ago by Hitler and now the majority of people wrongly look at the symbol like it was a villain in partnership with Hitler. I never called the swastika a "great symbol" and I didn't even mention it in the post you last replied to.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by PhlabibitThe site administrators felt that while the picture might have a place in some book. DVD or VHS. It didn't benefit this site. And shouldn't be used as an avatar here.
My problem is still that:
This image is practically the image you would find on the paper-back, DVD, or VHS Tape of this movie.
P-
RHP does not advertise DVD's or video's for free. Check the TOS
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by tomtom232I understand that the swastika is an eastern symbol.
You aren't worth arguing with. It is obvious to everyone that I did not say that.
The swastika was degraded a long time ago by Hitler and now the majority of people wrongly look at the symbol like it was a villain in partnership with Hitler. I never called the swastika a "great symbol" and I didn't even mention it in the post you last replied to.
for most people it is associated with the atrocities of the third reich.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Red NightJust because "most people" associate it with the atrocities of the the Third Reich, which I doubt, doesn't mean the swastika symbolizes only the Third Reich.
I understand that the swastika is an eastern symbol.
for most people it is associated with the atrocities of the third reich.
Just because YOU, and some others, are narrow-minded and assume that the whole world associates the swastika with Nazi doesn't mean everybody is that delusional.
04 Jun 09
Originally posted by Elamef37Stop defending yourself. Chris has already told you that there is no need and you were right. They are just badgering you now hoping someone will get up set and they they can ban someone. It's a trap and a game they play. They they pat each other on the back . Job well done the bad guys win. Don't fall into the trap. Don't allow others to fall victim either.
Please, I beg you, don't disappoint me. I've stated a couple of times, that I considered you intellectually smarter than me.
What you've shown to me, is that I'm repeating what the previous poster, before I said this, who was telling me about what Racism is, what his definition of Racism was. I do not see where I have said, Sushill was a racist.