General
13 Dec 16
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3Have you really still not bothered to read the message?
Yes, FMF sharing a PM because he did not 'like' her behavior is wrong.
If he didn't 'like' her behavior, then here's what he could have done:
Hit the 'reply button'.....and tell HER.
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by sonhouseHow is what has happened here an "OFF WITH HER HEAD" moment? Aren't supporters of Suzianne behaviour saying her message was justified? Isn’t she standing by its content? Haven't a series of posters, including yourself, been saying her silly threat is fine and then repeated silly threats of your own? What is the "OFF WITH HER HEAD" bit? What action against her are you claiming anyone is calling for?
It's really ridiculous these days, the advent of PC. There was a case of a child of 8 getting suspended for using his index finger shaped like a gun, going bang bang.
Seems a bit like that here.
MOMMY MOMMY, he pointed his finger at me AGAIN.
WHAT? OFF WITH HIS HEAD.
Originally posted by FMFThere's nothing wrong with it. And if you had bothered to keep up with this thread, and read my posts, you would notice that I quoted Suzianne's remarks more than once, including my exchanges with Ghost.
Well it would seem you haven't.
The fact is, she may have said something 'not nice', but it was not a thteat, as you have already admitted. You are now moving backwards to 'silly'.
So you feel it's okay to share silly PM's with friends? Without the sender's knowledge?
You have NO credible argument here.
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3Well the web site does say that the message facility should not be used for abusive or threatening texts and Suzianne won't be sending me any more similar messages, so all seems OK to me on the precedent front.
This issue is beginning to set a very ugly precedent.
Friends sending a PM to friends may not worry too much, but this 'precedent' is warning RHP members to NOT send a PM to another member who is not considered a 'friend', especially if you are debating them on subjects in the forums, because they may not 'like your behavior', and feel "justified" to share your message.
People should just say what they have to say in public and otherwise simply leave people they're tempted to harass alone, and certainly shouldn't be thinking they can use the web site's facility to attempt to lambast them in "secret", regardless of how laughable the efforts to do so are.
Originally posted by chaney3No there's been no moving backwards or forwards. There's been no moving at all. Right from the start, I've said I thought Suzianne's abuse and threats were laughable and ludicrous. My view in that has not changed one bit
The fact is, she may have said something 'not nice', but it was not a thteat, as you have already admitted. You are now moving backwards to 'silly'.
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFExactly.
Not at all. If any of you knew me one little bit from my posting history, you wouldn't be making fools of yourselves calling me names. The things you are calling me have been said by Suzianne herself countless times over the years, and it's all meaningless mush as far as I am concerned.
Way to take other people's feelings into consideration.
Oh, wait. That really is an alien concept to you, isn't it?
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3So there's nothing "wrong" with threatening to report me for harassment if I were to find a way of replying to her message?
I have read it more than once, but forgot the part about her 'ignoring' you. My bad, you could not reply. I still find nothing wrong with her message.
15 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFNo.
So there's nothing "wrong" with threatening to report me for harassment if I were to find a way of replying to her message?
Reporting you to RHP is her choice, the same choice you had with her.
She did NOT say that she would send your message to 20 friends.