Originally posted by divegeesterDive,
Ah, I see what you did there. Used deceit to imply that my post wasn't talking about publishing an abusive PM in the forums.
Actually in my opinion he was saying you were a tough guy also because what you said about seeing what would happen if you got sent a similiar P.M...
Kindest Regards,
Your Clan Brother, for now,
-VR
17 Dec 16
Originally posted by Very RustyDive will maintain that HE is allowed to make threats, because he is always right and justified.
Dive,
Actually in my opinion he was saying you were a tough guy also because what you said about seeing what would happen if you got sent a similiar P.M...
Kindest Regards,
You Clan Brother, for now,
-VR
His standards are only for himself and FMF, not for the rest of the RHP community.
Originally posted by divegeesterGood......because considering the fact that FMF did not feel thteatened at all by Suzianne's remark, and that everyone agrees her PM was not abusive, but heartfelt and sincere....Suzianne has now been 'cleared'.
Anyone is "allowed" to make threats.
Thanks Dive.
Thread closed.
Originally posted by chaney3But not "everyone" does think it wasn't abusive.as I've said several times, it's a matter of opinion but posters such as yourself are making the matter personal.
Good......because considering the fact that FMF did not feel thteatened at all by Suzianne's remark, and that everyone agrees her PM was not abusive, but heartfelt and sincere....Suzianne has now been 'cleared'.
Thanks Dive.
Thread closed.
Originally posted by divegeesterDive,
But not "everyone" does think it wasn't abusive.as I've said several times, it's a matter of opinion but posters such as yourself are making the matter personal.
Why do you keep the discussion going? It is over!!! Just let it go....
Kindest Regards,
Your Clan Brother, for now,
-VR
17 Dec 16
Originally posted by divegeesterIf you remove that ONE sentence, which FMF agrees is not even a threat, there is nothing abusive in the entirety of her PM.
But not "everyone" does think it wasn't abusive.as I've said several times, it's a matter of opinion but posters such as yourself are making the matter personal.
Only yourself and FMF keep using the word 'abusive'. Nobody else sees it that way.
17 Dec 16
Originally posted by Very RustySome 35 years ago, before I was saved, I got one step from becoming a JW, but in the end I couldn't reconcile their doctrine with what the Bible actually said.
Josephw,
They are not suppose to lie, cheat, or steal either. Robbie doesn't always follow the rules. I didn't think they drank, but robbie seems to be a sociable drinker so he claims, but drinks daily.
I didn't know they didn't celebrate Christmas. I don't know a lot about JW's, only what I've read. My Father & Mother never let them in our house ...[text shortened]... were Roman Catholics....I'm still trying to figure it all out like most people I guess.
-VR
Believe me, the fellas that tried indoctrinating me with what the Watchtower published were quite put off by the fact that I came to know who the Bible teaches Jesus really is.
17 Dec 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI was going to say essentially the same thing. What a word kerfuffle is. Hadn't heard it used in years.
I miss the days when people use to say 'kerfuffle.'
Things were much simpler back then. Tank tops were all the rage and a crisp one pound note could bribe a lazy sister into cleaning the rabbit hutch.
17 Dec 16
Originally posted by divegeesterIt's not a big deal dive. To you it sounds like tough guy talk, but back in the day out in the street fighting was a normal everyday occurrence. Not everyone was raised in that neck of the woods, so I understand your fear of ever meeting a real tough guy.
So you're a "street fighter" now are you?
I'm not so tough as that. I ran from more fights than I ever got into. 😉
But I know the neighborhood. Presumably you don't.