Go back
A real Apollo hero: Margaret Hamilton.

A real Apollo hero: Margaret Hamilton.

General

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
06 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
Game over. You want to play just by your rules when I put out fundamental problems with your flatass fantasy, you can't even tell me why you think GPS is from ground stations.
The game was over before it started.
I put the questions out around two years ago, and to date you've not provided a single answer.
Not one.

And I gave you an out; something which requires zero math, zero science since you refuse to apply either of them to the questions put to you.
One which involves nothing more than logic.

HOW DID THAT FOOTBALL GET ON ISS???

Forget that you can't explain how distant objects are visible.
Forget that you can't explain why NASA has never produced an unaltered photograph of the earth from space.

Just use logic and explain how that ball got there.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
06 Apr 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
The game was over before it started.
I put the questions out around two years ago, and [b]to date
you've not provided a single answer.
Not one.

And I gave you an out; something which requires zero math, zero science since you refuse to apply either of them to the questions put to you.
One which involves nothing more than logic.

HOW DID THAT ...[text shortened]... tered photograph of the earth from space.

Just use logic and explain how that ball got there.
You can't answer the GPS question because you know good and well it comes from the use of GPS satellites in orbit. Your motivation for your "ground station'' stance is obvious: Satellites cannot exist otherwise that alone would destroy your flatass fantasy.

That is the motivation for ALL your anti science anti-NASA stance. To admit men walked on the moon would be to admit we live on a round planet. Pretty simple. That guides your entire psyche.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
06 Apr 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
You can't answer the GPS question because you know good and well it comes from the use of GPS satellites in orbit. Your motivation for your "ground station'' stance is obvious: Satellites cannot exist otherwise that alone would destroy your flatass fantasy.

That is the motivation for ALL your anti science anti-NASA stance. To admit men walked on the moon would be to admit we live on a round planet. Pretty simple. That guides your entire psyche.
HOW DID THAT FOOTBALL GET ON ISS???

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
06 Apr 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
[b]HOW DID THAT FOOTBALL GET ON ISS???[/b]
You can't even acknowledge your stance, you can't admit there are satellites even. Screw the footballs. You are anti-science, anti-NASA BECAUSE to be otherwise destroys your flatass universe.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
06 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
You can't even acknowledge your stance, you can't admit there are satellites even. Screw the footballs. You are anti-science, anti-NASA BECAUSE to be otherwise destroys your flatass universe.
Finally, Freaky is revealed for the intellectual coward he is. To say nothing of being a troll to begin with.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
06 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
You can't even acknowledge your stance, you can't admit there are satellites even. Screw the footballs. You are anti-science, anti-NASA BECAUSE to be otherwise destroys your flatass universe.
For all of your bluster and insistence on the science of the situation, one could possibly surmise that you know something of the related fields.
However, you have demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the scientific method--- ANY of the scientific methods, for that matter.
What I have offered as a replacement to theoretic speculations are two scenarios, the testing of which conform with the rigors of any and all scientific methods which could be applied.
The third question--- the one you complain as being anti-science--- is clearly the easiest one to answer out of all of them... and yet you refuse to have anything to do with it.
That's weird.
Here's something which requires nothing but observation, the ability to distinguish dates, understand a calendar, and perhaps read a sports page.
Of course, you'll need logic in order to sort through the information and make an intelligent analysis of the same, but otherwise, the scenario requires very little effort.
HOW DID THAT FOOTBALL GET ON ISS?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
06 Apr 17
1 edit

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
For all of your bluster and insistence on the science of the situation, one could possibly surmise that you know something of the related fields.
However, you have demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the scientific method--- ANY of the scientific methods, for that matter.
What I have offered as a replacement to theoretic speculations are two ...[text shortened]... otherwise, the scenario requires very little effort.
[b]HOW DID THAT FOOTBALL GET ON ISS?
[/b]
Not playing your game anymore. You said it, no more communications with you.
You are a proven intellectual coward and traitor to the United States.

Captain Strange

Mar-a-Lago

Joined
02 Aug 11
Moves
8962
Clock
07 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
Not playing your game anymore. You said it, no more communications with you.
You are a proven intellectual coward and traitor to the United States.
Do you consider the folks who uncovered Watergate traitors ?

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
07 Apr 17

Originally posted by Captain Strange
Do you consider the folks who uncovered Watergate traitors ?
Ouch.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
07 Apr 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

This is the 100th post.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
07 Apr 17

Originally posted by Captain Strange
Do you consider the folks who uncovered Watergate traitors ?
Yes, traitors just like Freak but different events. If you are one of the moon landing deniers you are a traitor too.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
07 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
Yes, traitors just like Freak but different events. If you are one of the moon landing deniers you are a traitor too.
So when you finally realize we didn't land on the moon, what will that make you?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
07 Apr 17
2 edits

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
So when you finally realize we didn't land on the moon, what will that make you?
And when another lander shows footprints what will YOU think, traitor? If I met you in person I might even pull a Buzz on you.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
07 Apr 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
And when another lander shows footprints what will YOU think, traitor? If I met you in person I might even pull a Buzz on you.
That would be an ill-advised move.
Buzz--- coward and liar that he is--- waited for the perfect time to throw a sucker punch.
True American hero, that one.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
07 Apr 17
3 edits

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
That would be an ill-advised move.
Buzz--- coward and liar that he is--- waited for the perfect time to throw a sucker punch.
True American hero, that one.
A richly deserved sucker punch too. That dude was asking for it. He would't shut up, like the traitor he was and is.

That dude was not a reporter, he was another assswipe denier:

"Mr. Sibrel was hit in the face by Mr. Aldrin, who claimed to only be defending himself and his stepdaughter from the man who had got in his face. This all happened after Sibrel came up to Aldrin, screaming for him to place his hand on the Bible and swear the moon landing was real.

The police began investigating the incident, but the charges were dropped after witnesses came forth and told them Sibrel had placed his hands on Aldrin, actually pushing the Bible into his chest aggressively before the punch.

There were also witnesses that stated Aldrin was lured to the hotel by Sibrel. Supposedly, Aldrin was told by Sibrel he wished to do an interview with him, but had always planned to ambush the astronaut. Elizabeth Ratinoff, the Deputy District Attorney, told a news agency that she had a videotape that was shot by the cameraman hired by Sibrel, showing him following and screaming that Aldrin was a “thief, liar and coward”."

This is from this site:

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/01/31/50477/

This is how traitors act and they should all get the same treatment.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.