- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121833
@very-rusty saidSo are you coming over or not?
Don't be so silly, I know you never been in a fight in your life, I don't pick on people who can't defend themselves. 🙂 😛
-VR
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121833
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think you’ll find in your employment conditions that you shouldn’t use your work email for personal use, especially for the nefarious purpose you used it for.
Egress treats internal and external emails differently. It is not something I have control of. It is done automatically when an email is sent.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29866
@fmf saidLook FMF, you compromised your own radio show by not treating with respect the work submitted in good faith by one of your contributors. At precisely the time we had fallen out at RHP and without my knowledge or consent you altered my name, broadcast on the radio. This coincided with the show, for the first time, not being made available for preview before it went out. (So I had to listen to it for the first time live). It was not common at the time to make spoonerisms out of the contributors names, and when this did become common you sought the permission of the contributors involved. You sought no such permission from myself. You did not make me aware of your intent.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Your failed attempt to sabotage the radio progamme, by going behind my back when a single PM would have solved "the problem", happened two and a half years ago.
Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportunity to plug the gaps left. (Which you did). My direct contact with the Radio show was to ensure that none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Your spiteful attempt to sabotage the show failed. It's still going strong.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29866
@fmf saidThe spite was all yours sir. When I listened to the show, where for the first time I couldn't preview it (something flagged up with my by Phil who was also unable to preview it) I knew you had done something, due to us having fallen out. I assumed you had simply cut me out of the show and wanted me to find out live, but no, you had messed my name.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Your spiteful attempt to sabotage the show failed. It's still going strong.
It was the one petty bit of control you had.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThere was no "spite" or "pettiness" on my part. None whatsoever. You've been wrong about that all along.
The spite was all yours sir. When I listened to the show, where for the first time I couldn't preview it (something flagged up with my by Phil who was also unable to preview it) I knew you had done something, due to us having fallen out. I assumed you had simply cut me out of the show and wanted me to find out live, but no, you had messed my name.
It was the one petty bit of control you had.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou only had to PM me. A different light-hearted pseudonym would have been inserted. And a modified audio file would have been sent to the station. You'd probably still be involved in the show to this day. But instead, you did the most vindictive thing you could think of. Oh well. The show survived.
I don't believe you. Your account requires an inordinate amount of coincidences and basic errors/poor decisions on your part.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29866
@fmf saidWe have already established you had ignored my 2 previous emails. But as above:
You only had to PM me. A different light-hearted pseudonym would have been inserted. And a modified audio file would have been sent to the station. You'd probably still be involved in the show to this day. But instead, you did the most vindictive thing you could think of. Oh well. The show survived.
'Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportunity to plug the gaps left. (Which you did). My direct contact with the Radio show was to ensure that none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.'
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121833
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou being terribly terribly upset about your name being non-maliciously spoonerised, and wether or not it hadn’t happened before (although it had happened to Phil) is irrelevant to the way you behaved, your decision making in the matter was utterly appalling, as was your slander of FMF and myself in your club.
Look FMF, you compromised your own radio show by not treating with respect the work submitted in good faith by one of your contributors. At precisely the time we had fallen out at RHP and without my knowledge or consent you altered my name, broadcast on the radio. This coincided with the show, for the first time, not being made available for preview before it went ou ...[text shortened]... at none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
All you had to do was ask me if I was involved, you didn’t, I didn’t even know about it until it was all over.
All you had to do was have a man to man convo with FMF and say hey I don’t like this please don’t do it again.
You allowed your spiteful emotionalism to completely overrun your rationality and it ruined two friendships you had and several others in the collateral damage of your club. This is why you struggle with your work colleagues, you’re not good under pressure and revert to this sort of behaviour.
Irrespective of your bust up with FMF, you owe me an apology or at the very least an acknowledgment that you made a mistake with me. I know I won’t get it because fundamentally you’re brittle, spiteful and too proud. Also there’s too much water under the bridge now and you have too much invested in your persona here.
@ghost-of-a-duke said"Ramifications"? Are you going to bring a lawsuit and try to get the radio station closed down?
If a complaint was made to your radio show in writing which you then shared publically, you don't think that would have ramifications?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29866
17 Feb 23
@divegeester saidThe spoonerism thing is a bit of an own goal on your part, as for the first couple of years FMF insisted it was a pseudonym to give the impression more writers were involved. This of course was ludicrous as a pseudonym by design should not be relatable to a persons real name (as a spoonerism is).
You being terribly terribly upset about your name being non-maliciously spoonerised, and wether or not it hadn’t happened before (although it had happened to Phil) is irrelevant to the way you behaved, your decision making in the matter was utterly appalling as was your slander of FMF and myself in your club.
All you had to do was ask me if I was involved, you didn’t, ...[text shortened]... lso there’s too much water under the bridge now and you have too much invested in your persona here.
And the issue was only brought up in the Chamber after I was made aware of the falsehoods FMF was sharing in the WhatsUp group. It was the only platform I had as a right to reply (as a number of the same members were in both groups).
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI received no email or PM from you about the pseudonym issue. You did not send one and instead you simply handled the situation in the most vindictive way available to you.
We have already established you had ignored my 2 previous emails. But as above:
'Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportun ...[text shortened]... t none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.'