03 Jun 15
Originally posted by SchlecterLast line in the uncyclopedia entry is funny:
what about this wiki....???
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Hot_Pawn
"It is highly illegal to use an engine for assistance playing chess or inputting moves faster than humanly possible. It is also utterly undetectable, and thus practiced by about 98% of players."
Originally posted by divegeesterI'm just saying that responsible reporting must offer the bad with the good.
I doubt that the "'wild-west' atmosphere of the early forum activity" and the "controversy" surrounding players being banned for engine use are quite what Russ had in mind as being representative of RHP. I also suspect that what you refer to as "the more controversial bits of RHP" are only of interest to existing members involved with such controversy.
Not doing so is called bias.
04 Jun 15
Originally posted by moonbusI'd reckon it would be appropriate to include links to other chess web sites' wikipedia pages (if they have them) and state that they offer comparable facilities for chess play and related interaction or learning.
Recommendation noted. Thanks.
Originally posted by divegeesterEven those of us involved in the controversial bits of RHP, no longer care about things said, or done in the past. Majority of us you can almost hold a conversation with now. 😉
I doubt that the "'wild-west' atmosphere of the early forum activity" and the "controversy" surrounding players being banned for engine use are quite what Russ had in mind as being representative of RHP. I also suspect that what you refer to as "the more controversial bits of RHP" are only of interest to existing members involved with such controversy.
-VR