29 Dec 20
-Removed-As a contributor to the show, FMF had a duty to respect my work and authorship. In a 'best case scenario' he failed to understand the point of a pseudonym (that it shouldn't be a childish spoonerism of my real name, immediately identifiable) and to inform me that was his intent. (Which he didn't). Other contributors were given a distorted account of what had occurred on a platform to which I had no right of address. (Hence the thread in a private forum to which some of the contributors were members).
29 Dec 20
-Removed-That makes no sense. You realize that right?
I am told (after the event) that my name had been changed to give the impression more people were contributing to the program. (Itself immediately sad). However, instead of choosing a pseudonym unrelated to my name (like Joe Bloggs) a spoonerism is used of my real name where the first initials were merely reversed. (Making it blatantly obvious the two were the same person, negating the whole point of creating a second name).
Ridiculing my real name on live radio when my family and friends are listening is not okay. If other contributors are okay with that it's because they agreed to it in advance and knew what was going on. I didn't and reacted accordingly.
29 Dec 20
-Removed-As long as they have read both sides of the argument, I'm happy for them to draw their own conclusions on how they would have responded in my place.
They will both be aware that when this occurred it was the first time the show didn't appear in advance for prelistening.