16 Mar 19
@executioner-brand saidAttempting to follow your reasoning here: in order to deter some wanna-be Islamist from traveling to Syria, joining the ISIS jihad, and raping some under-age Iraqi girl, Mr. Tarrant goes to two mosques in NZ, murders Mucad Ibrahim, age 3, and 48 others. Have I got that right? Killing a 3-year old child in NZ is somehow going to stop or prevent an underage girl kidnapped from Iraq from being raped!?
Mark Taylor joined this religion went to Syria, joined isis and believed he was entitled to buy wives of little kidnapped Iraqi girls. But he could only afford rubbish. When your religion does shyt like that you are entitled to this.
Does it not strike you that many of the NZ mosque victims were refugees fleeing ISIS? Precisely because they do not agree with ISIS's programme or interpretation of Islam.
@rookie54 said“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tolls for thee.“
@divegeester
the dismissive attitude towards the newly orphaned kids...
and you truly do not see that???
odd
—John Donne
When I read divegeester’s comment, and knowing him as I do (although I have not yet had the pleasure of meeting him face to face), the preceding quote immediately came to mind. When I read dive’s post, what I felt I’d the reminder that although the NZ mass murders are horrific, they are not isolated. These acts happen every day and far too forgotten and collectively dismissed...the very point that I believe divegeester was trying to make yet ironically for which he was challenged.
Social forums are fertile ground for murky misunderstandings.
Dismissive is the last word I would use to describe my friend.
@moonbus saidI never said it was going to stop any of the terrible wrongs the child rape religion achieves every day. I said shyt is going to happen to them for good reason like the wrongs the religion did with Mark Taylor or any believer who follows child rape and expects peace. Isn't it wrong, first, to be accepting a religion that aims to have sex with children?
Attempting to follow your reasoning here: in order to deter some wanna-be Islamist from traveling to Syria, joining the ISIS jihad, and raping some under-age Iraqi girl, Mr. Tarrant goes to two mosques in NZ, murders Mucad Ibrahim, age 3, and 48 others. Have I got that right? Killing a 3-year old child in NZ is somehow going to stop or prevent an underage girl kidnapped from ...[text shortened]... eing[/i] ISIS? Precisely because they do not agree with ISIS's programme or interpretation of Islam.
@hakima saidThank you Hakima, you are precisely correct and I should have explained myself more clearly to avoid being misunderstood; no harm done though I’m sure. A misunderstanding of misunderstandings.
“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tol ...[text shortened]... ound for murky misunderstandings.
Dismissive is the last word I would use to describe my friend.
All is good with Rookie and me I am sure.
🙂