DC Sniper Being Put To Sleep In 2 Hours

Originally posted by gambit3
It was never lawful. The governments just chose not to defend all people's rights.

when there was no law preventing it, it was lawful.

Originally posted by Palynka
Zing!

Thank you, sensei.

I've learned from you how to detect the hypocrisy out of incoherent users' posts.
Of course Sam is an easy laboratory hamster, but I'll escalate into actually smart
posters soon.

*bows respectfully*

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Funny there's no protests.

Oh they were there--ringin' the bell...

Originally posted by zeeblebot
nice of you to say what they should be feeling.

I did not dictate what they should be feeling. What was inferred, that I responded to, was that time does not heal all wounds. I merely stated that people have a choice about whether to heal within themselves or not.

Nice of you to show your usual comprehension of English, though.

Originally posted by Palynka
I mourn for the whole of Virginia.

Why what happened to her hole?

Originally posted by wormwood
when there was no law preventing it, it was lawful.

The nazi Germans tried that defense when they were being court marshalled.

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
Why what happened to her hole?

It just got deeper.

Originally posted by gambit3
The nazi Germans tried that defense when they were being court marshalled.

and was it regarded murder even though it was lawful? well?


thank you for making my point. 😕

Originally posted by Anonymousnumber1
that is dishonest. to summarize a single event into the defying meaning of a person isn't right, or even accurate. a more through investigation is needed; more data, more interpretation

He forfeited his life...Executing a condemned prisoner is not murder.

No s/he did not. We did that. At least take responsibility for your accus ...[text shortened]... to conclude that we have all the variables, and tools to make those kinds of conclusions.

John allan Muhammad was not rehabilitatable one bit. The greater probability that he would relapse into murderous behavior is extremely high. Society cannot run the risk of releasing such an animal. It is indeed pretty black and white. You kill with alevosity, premeditation and advantage results in forfeiting your life. Him and any other animal. It is not murder when the killing of the individual follows a judicial procedure, imperfect if you may, but legally acceptable. Murder requires the corollary of no greater good attained via the killing of the executed. Executing a convict saves lives. Hence it does not meet the definition of murder. Murder is ILLEGAL, executing a convict is not murder. What thourough investigation could possibly disclose any other outcome? What you propose is simply hand wringing forever. If we cannot decipher why people commit most acts what could we glean from studying this convict? Nothing at all. He was an animal who needed to be separated from this world lest we allow him to relapse on some unsupecting victim. Are you willing to risk innocent lives to make yourself feel better? Isn't the greater good better served by eliminating murderous scum?

What is it exactly Muhammad did not understand? He hid inside a car with a mechanism to coneal his weapon, fled the scene, laid low, reloaded, repeated eight times all the while terrorizing a tri-state area. What is it this scumbag did not understand exactly? To then make his stepson an accomplice is further proof of his evil mind. Oh and BTY, the stepson should have been executed too, but because of bleeding heart laws he will not. His youth is no excuse. Life in prison is not good enough. He should be executed as well, although I predict he will get murdered in prison.

A just war is one whereby we do unto others before they do unto us what they were planning. Killing. You fire upon those who would exact a sentence on your people. War is about defending ones nation.

Muhammad received the due process he di not afford his victims. His trial was a fair trial, went through exhausting all appeals and the sentence was upheld. End of story. Let his creator redeem him in the after world. I suspect where he is now and it is not likely pleasant.

Originally posted by wormwood
your post reeks of bloodlust, vengeance and hate. obviously you have a strong urge to get someone you don't even know killed.

now, where's the difference between that and shooting random people on the street?

well, for one, at least you haven't acted on your urge. still, a case could be made that people like you should be put 'to sleep', just as a pr ...[text shortened]... ften argued on preventing convicted criminals from repeating the offence by death sentence.

It will never cease to amaze me how people like you seem to be able to detect bloodlust in a person because of their opinions yet are compltely unable to do the same with blood thirsty murderers like the DC sniper. Can you explain this. You have tried and convicted me in one fell swoop, yet are unwilling to accept the verdict of a court of law. You seem to belive the DC sniper was innocent. How do you explain your willingness to impugn the peacable and innocent yet go to bat so strongly for a convicted killer? Then you try and make the case for executing people like me "as a precaution". I do not for a minute believe you are a peaceful man for you advocate the execution of me as a "precaution". You show a really mentally disturbed streak evident in projecting blood lust on others when you are the more likely person to persecute the innocent all the while defending the justly condemned. The hypocrisy in you is so glaring it is scary. I just hope you are not involved in the justice sytem in any way for you would puch for a "thought police". You probably also find abortion perfectly accpetable despite the true torture fetuses are subjected to. Hell you will likely argue fetuses aren't persons, but Muhammad, AKA DC Sniper, was! You really need your head examined.

Originally posted by scacchipazzo
.... I suspect where he is now and it is not likely pleasant.

This constitutes the highest sort of conjecture. Not only is there no way you can possibly know this, you have absolutely no foundation for making this statement; quite simply, you don't know - at all - and refuse to admit it to yourself.

Originally posted by scacchipazzo
It will never cease to amaze me how people like you seem to be able to detect bloodlust in a person because of their opinions yet are compltely unable to do the same with blood thirsty murderers like the DC sniper. Can you explain this. You have tried and convicted me in one fell swoop, yet are unwilling to accept the verdict of a court of law. You seem ...[text shortened]... ses aren't persons, but Muhammad, AKA DC Sniper, was! You really need your head examined.

where did I claim the sniper was innocent or didn't have bloodlust? absolutely nowhere. try not to make up things.

I also didn't say I thought you should be executed. I'm against all murder, remember? -I merely pointed out that the exact same justification would apply to preventing repeated offences before the repeating happens, AND stopping someone like you before you act on your obvious urges to kill people you don't know.

which dumbed down means: if you accept preventing repeated offence by executing the guy BEFORE he has repeated anything, you are 'punishing' him for assumed violent and bloodhungry THOUGHTS. which logically means you should ALSO accept that such a person could've been executed even before the first offence by the same exact criteria. now, based on your posts, you would fit right in the latter category.

which should now make you think whether 'preventing' a repeated offence can be justified, or is just emotionally fueled rubbish.


the rest of the stuff you wrote is way too retarded to even comment on. mentally disturbed for not going off like you? thought police? abortion? torturing fetuses?