Generaldata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9740c/9740c1fe1b8139d73f78db2888c05aee8e122c68" alt="Clock Clock"
24 May 09
Originally posted by cashthetrashA) He was wrong to alert posts just to test the system, yes;
Please stop calling me an idiot because you have the lack of understanding.
So your answer is that, in your opinion;
A) Cribs was wrong for Alerting posts.
B) Cribs was wrong for coming back as Dr Scribbles
C) If Rusty alerted posts that he felt offensive and if not removed by the mods, as a side issue to see if that means it establishes a standa ...[text shortened]... Russ for Banning Cribs?
I am only concerned with your opinion. Please don't pass the buck.
B) I don't have enough info to know whether he was allowed back or not. Certainly Russ decided it was alright for him to stay. I'm sorry I can't give a "yes or no" answer when I don't have all the facts;
C) You're not supposed to do alerts just to "test" the system. If he's so offended by the material, why does he keep repeating the substance of the "offensive" posts? I said that Cribs got banned for doing what VR said he was doing. That's a fact;
D) From what I know, I don't think Cribs should have been banned.
A question for you: do you think VR should be able to make continued threats of violence against other users here?Or should that be grounds for a Forum Ban? Your opinion; don't pass the buck.
Originally posted by Very RustyHey, I never tried to get naked pictures from anybody at RHP. And a minor, Rusty? Shocking.
let me know next time your in halifax, I would love to see you try, you hot air bag...I will tell you why your afraid of me, because you come to visit friends here in Halifax from time to time, you told me yourself in p.m. yet you are afraid to let me know when you are coming or to meet up with this old man as you say. 🙂
Any way I promised Cash I would end this so to you and your buddy Pedo.
THE END!
Originally posted by no1marauderAlright fair enough, you think Cribs was wrong but shouldn't have been banned. You think Rusty would also be wrong but think that he should be banned. Is that correct?
A) He was wrong to alert posts just to test the system, yes;
B) I don't have enough info to know whether he was allowed back or not. Certainly Russ decided it was alright for him to stay. I'm sorry I can't give a "yes or no" answer when I don't have all the facts;
C) You're not supposed to do alerts just to "test" the system. If he's so offended by the ...[text shortened]... e?Or should that be grounds for a Forum Ban? Your opinion; don't pass the buck.So
Answer to your Question. HOH threatens to beat Rusty with a Brick, I think that is wrong. But if HOH isn't banned for that, or you are not baned for insulting Rusty and his daughter, then no I don't think Rusty should be for standing up for his daughter.
As far as the alleged threats of violence that you claim Rusty threated he would personally do is a little vague for me to comment on. I never saw a direct threat just a hypothetical. If you can show me the threat in question, then I will review it and give you my honest opinion. Bear in mind Moderators have their own opinions. If you are scared for your or your families safety, and believe them to be sincere then please alert the posts. I never felt that drinking beer and shooting pool is an act of violence. It might be if someone was stupid enough to pop off about their daughter though. It would be here in Texas I can promise you. And every mans son in Texas would testify in a court of law that it's true.
Originally posted by cashthetrashNo, it isn't correct. I don't think Cribs should have been banned, but he was. VR thinks that the policies here should be "consistent". If VR does fundamentally the same thing as Cribs and if the policies here must be consistent, then VR should be banned. It's really not all that hard to understand, so you're either being disingenuous or stupid.
Alright fair enough, you think Cribs was wrong but shouldn't have been banned. You think Rusty would also be wrong but think that he should be banned. Is that correct?
Answer to your Question. HOH threatens to beat Rusty with a Brick, I think that is wrong. But if HOH isn't banned for that, or you are not baned for insulting Rusty and his daughter, ...[text shortened]... can promise you. And every mans son in Texas would testify in a court of law that it's true.
Users have been banned for making the type of personal threats (which include threats of stalking) that VR has repeatedly made in this thread. It has nothing to do with "standing up" for anybody; the post he is whining about was removed last night and the only one still mentioning it is him. He's apparently looking for a fight, the same as last night when my off-hand jesting post (which had absolutely nothing to do with him or his daughter(?)) was left lying there until he came on talking about "smashing people's faces". I doubt that he knows anything about such an endeavor and I'm certainly not afraid of bogus internet tough guys. But if you want "consistent" moderation, then repeated threats of violence and stalking should be dealt with as harshly now as they were in the past.
You may keep weaseling if you want, but I don't know of any forum where repeated threats like VR has done is acceptable behavior. "Consistent moderation" would necessitate an appropriately long forum ban.
Originally posted by Very RustyThe one who "started the crap" was YOU by taking an innocuous, jesting post having nothing to do with you as an excuse to start making posts about "smashing people's faces". The Mods may review the removed thread at their leisure and they'll see who escalated the situation. It wasn't me.
Cash just stop feeding the troll, it came on last night in a drunken haze and started the crap, the Moderator knows the real truth.
HE even tried to tell us how much smarter he was drunk that I was sober, typical even when drunk.
You need the help of mental health professionals. A good long vacation from these Forums would be good for you and the Forums.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou started you were wrong get over it.
The one who "started the crap" was YOU by taking an innocuous, jesting post having nothing to do with you as an excuse to start making posts about "smashing people's faces". The Mods may review the removed thread at their leisure and they'll see who escalated the situation. It wasn't me.
You need the help of mental health professionals. A good long vacation from these Forums would be good for you and the Forums.
IF you can't handle your booze don't come on the forums when your drunk.
Consider yourself fortunate you didn't get a good long forum ban for you actions.
THE END!
Originally posted by Very RustyThe old man comment was meant as saying friend etc.
I don't care how many cheaters he got off the site to be honest with you. Don't talk to me about friends, no friend talks crap like that about someones daughter, and no friend laughs about it thinking it is funny, OLD MAN!
I am in much better health and shape than you are, so don't start with your old man business on me.
The man, and I use the term ...[text shortened]... ind out what a magnificent chess player he is....barely 1600 in the real world is what he is!
I am glad to know you are in better health than me. I would not wish what I have on my worst enemy, let alone a team mate.
Originally posted by Ice ColdOk It was the heat of the moment, like when some ass asks if you your daughter looks like a pig and if she doesn't they would give you a fiver for her, it got me upset, it was not untill several posts later I found that the poster who said it was drunk, and being stupid thinking it was a joke.
The old man comment was meant as saying friend etc.
I am glad to know you are in better health than me. I would not wish what I have on my worst enemy, let alone a team mate.
It appeared to me that you also thought it was funny, and I don't see the joke.
Originally posted by Very RustyYou're a truly sick and warped individual. In the space of less than 24 hours, you've made repeated threats of physical violence, threatened to go to two users residences and solicited nude photos from a minor on this site.
You started you were wrong get over it.
IF you can't handle your booze don't come on the forums when your drunk.
Consider yourself fortunate you didn't get a good long forum ban for you actions.
THE END!
How long a ban do you think someone who's done all that deserves, VR?
Originally posted by Very RustyDon't sweat it pal. 🙂
Ok It was the heat of the moment, like when some ass asks if you your daughter looks like a pig and if she doesn't they would give you a fiver for her, it got me upset, it was not untill several posts later I found that the poster who said it was drunk, and being stupid thinking it was a joke.
It appeared to me that you also thought it was funny, and I don't see the joke.
I'll be the first to admit I have poor taste in humor at times. 🙂
Originally posted by Ice ColdI certainly do too, but I look at some things as being off limit.
Don't sweat it pal. 🙂
I'll be the first to admit I have poor taste in humor at times. 🙂
The 'Hi' thread in general is an example of that it was in bad taste, but only said in jest, not trying to get nude pics from a minor as 'no one' would have you believe, but not an appropriate joke.
Originally posted by Very RustyI have watched you change #1's original post little by little. It was hardly inobvious as you keep claiming that "any father would smash his face if he said that" and then claim that he said it about YOUR daughter when he said no such thing. His original joke wasn't even in reply to any of your posts.
Ok It was the heat of the moment, like when some ass asks if you your daughter looks like a pig and if she doesn't they would give you a fiver for her, it got me upset, it was not untill several posts later I found that the poster who said it was drunk, and being stupid thinking it was a joke.
It appeared to me that you also thought it was funny, and I don't see the joke.
Originally posted by tomtom232Go argue with the Mod that removed it not me. What he said and who it was directed to is there in black and white.
I have watched you change #1's original post little by little. It was hardly inobvious as you keep claiming that "any father would smash his face if he said that" and then claim that he said it about YOUR daughter when he said no such thing. His original joke wasn't even in reply to any of your posts.
It is ok though, he will appreciate that you are on side, even if you aren't the brightest bulb in the room.
Originally posted by Very RustyYou are a liar. Simple as that. If you want to argue that then I have cold hard facts that catch you in a lie twice in this very thread.
Go argue with the Mod that removed it not me. What he said and who it was directed to is there in black and white.
It is ok though, he will appreciate that you are on side, even if you aren't the brightest bulb in the room.