Go back
Forum Reboot

Forum Reboot

General

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
12 Nov 22

@kevin-eleven said
You're the one who couldn't bring himself to defend his own wife.
You’re circling the drain again.

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
12 Nov 22

@divegeester said
You’re circling the drain again.
Because you won't stand up for your own wife?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
12 Nov 22
2 edits

@kevin-eleven said
Because you won't stand up for your own wife?
Which one of your malicious thoughts would you like to discuss first; “undermining the faith of someone who has lost a child”, or defending family members against online disinhibited ne'er-do-wells?

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
12 Nov 22

@divegeester said
Which one of your malicious thoughts would you like to discuss first; “undermining the faith of someone who has lost a child”, or defending family members against online disinhibited ne'er-do-wells?
Agitated attempts at deflection noted.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
12 Nov 22

@kevin-eleven said
Agitated attempts at deflection noted.
Deflection from what?

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
12 Nov 22

@divegeester said
Deflection from what?
a) Why didn't you defend your own wife the other night?

b) Why do you try to undermine the faith of someone whose child has died?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
12 Nov 22

@kevin-eleven said
a) Why didn't you defend your own wife the other night?

b) Why do you try to undermine the faith of someone whose child has died?
Ok, I’ll play with you Kevin.

a) my wife was in no need of defending.

b) I don’t.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
12 Nov 22

@kevin-eleven said
It could be said that lack of necessity is no reason not to do something.

It could also be said that your second statement was either an unprovable categorical assertion or a passive-aggressive attempt to control me with an appeal to my consideration of your sensibilities.

However, I do understand the general principle re: forum etiquette that you were trying to ge ...[text shortened]... ple of forum etiquette, it seems that you stood up for @divegeester's wife more than he himself did.
You've been here long enough to know that there are several things that are off limits here:

1. disparaging relatives of members who are not themselves members and cannot defend themselves here.

2. disparaging members on account of addiction, whether they are still addicted or dry (narcotics, alcohol, etc.).

3. disparaging members who have served time or are still serving time in prison on account of their criminal record.

4. disparaging members who are handicapped on account of their handicap.

This is not a complete list, but you get the idea.

Really, this should go without saying. But apparently somebody had to say it.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
12 Nov 22

@moonbus

5) Disparaging people because of their chess rating

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
12 Nov 22

@divegeester said
@moonbus

5) Disparaging people because of their chess rating
Am always irked by that. Chess players should encourage each other in this regard.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
12 Nov 22

@divegeester said
@moonbus

5) Disparaging people because of their chess rating
Agreed. TU from me, dive.

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19047
Clock
12 Nov 22

It is a daft one, what does a chess rating show? How good you are at chess, nothing more, nothing less.

Even then it can be debated because ratings change so much.

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640293
Clock
12 Nov 22
2 edits

@moonbus said
Agreed. TU from me, dive.
Anytime that gooster calls me names, I will remind him of his chess rating. You can take that one to the bank.

You don't call someone a moron when your own rating is under 1000!

Would it be more proper for me to tell him the cognitive side of the brain was sick? πŸ™‚

-VR

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
12 Nov 22

@very-rusty said
Anytime that gooster calls me names, I will remind him of his chess rating. You can take that one to the bank.

You don't call someone a moron when your own rating is under 1000!

Would it be more proper for me to tell him the cognitive side of the brain was sick? πŸ™‚

-VR
I think you have more options than linking such a dig to a player's rating. (Not everybody with a rating below 1000 is a moron). By all means fire something back, but it's generally accepted poor etiquette to berate someone's family or chess ability. (Both being cheap shots).

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640293
Clock
12 Nov 22
2 edits

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I think you have more options than linking such a dig to a player's rating. (Not everybody with a rating below 1000 is a moron). By all means fire something back, but it's generally accepted poor etiquette to berate someone's family or chess ability. (Both being cheap shots).
Thanks for the advice, but the gooster knows what is coming when he calls me names.

I don't want to disappoint him! πŸ™‚

BTW: I am not calling everyone with a 1000 or below a 1000 rating a moron just one person who enjoys calling me one. πŸ™‚ An eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth, it is in the Bible! πŸ™‚

-VR

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.