General
15 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am honoured to be chosen as part of the elite group of RHP posters who don't use babytalk or trashtalk.
You, FMF, Kewpie and Handy Andy, the general forum establishment and enemies of the people. So why are you revolting?
I doubt there'll be a revolution here, though - too many of the other kind around here.
Originally posted by KewpieWrong again.
I am honoured to be chosen as part of the elite group of RHP posters who don't use babytalk or trashtalk.
I doubt there'll be a revolution here, though - too many of the other kind around here.
It won't be you and the others in this elitist list leading the revolt, it'll be that "other kind" you and the others continually denigrate. All revolts are against the "elite".
Originally posted by Suzianne to KewpieThe only posters I've seen Kewpie criticize recently were robbie carrobie and Seitse. Was she wrong to speak out? Do you think she denigrated them?
It won't be you and the others in this elitist list leading the revolt, it'll be that "other kind" you and the others continually denigrate.
16 Sep 16
Originally posted by SuzianneTo denigrate is to belittle or criticize unfairly.
Wrong again.
It won't be you and the others in this elitist list leading the revolt, it'll be that "other kind" you and the others continually denigrate. All revolts are against the "elite".
Which posters have I belittled or criticized unfairly?
16 Sep 16
Originally posted by SuzianneI had lunch with Russ last weekend.
Wrong again.
It won't be you and the others in this elitist list leading the revolt, it'll be that "other kind" you and the others continually denigrate. All revolts are against the "elite".
We talked and talked about RHP.
You wern't mentioned.
Originally posted by KewpieGreat lets talk about the genocide of aboriginal Australians and try to determine if you should carry any societal moral responsibility. For while you were not directly responsible as far as I am aware, you are the recipient of land seized and its indigenous inhabitants systematically killed, poisoned, forcibly removed and their culture destroyed. That sober enough for you? 😲
I am honoured to be chosen as part of the elite group of RHP posters who don't use babytalk or trashtalk.
I doubt there'll be a revolution here, though - too many of the other kind around here.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYes, we should and we do carry the moral responsibility for the attempted genocide of aboriginal Australians, and we do what we can to repair the damage caused long ago by the invasion from the British Isles. For me it's an indirect responsibility though, my family arrived in this country from other places and I have not a single drop of British blood. Should all people of British ancestry also share our collective responsibility, do you think?
Great lets talk about the genocide of aboriginal Australians and try to determine if you should carry any societal moral responsibility. For while you were not directly responsible as far as I am aware, you are the recipient of land seized and its indigenous inhabitants systematically killed, poisoned, forcibly removed and their culture destroyed. That sober enough for you? 😲
Originally posted by KewpieAttempted genocide? Come now tweetie pie in what sense was the genocide merely attempted? Lets not kid ourselves what happened to the aboriginal Australians fits every description and definition of a genocide. Long ago? it wasn't that long ago mate! Well within two generations!
Yes, we should and we do carry the moral responsibility for the attempted genocide of aboriginal Australians, and we do what we can to repair the damage caused long ago by the invasion from the British Isles. For me it's an indirect responsibility though, my family arrived in this country from other places and I have not a single drop of British blood. Should all people of British ancestry also share our collective responsibility, do you think?
I am not entirely sure whether you should or do carry a retrospective moral responsibility to be honest, its not entirely clear in my mind and the elements are very complicated so that I cannot see it clearly. Some might conclude that its a stupid question but I don't think it is. Whether all those of British or other ancestry who are the direct recipients of land seized by dispossessing indigenous people and whether they should carry some kind of retrospective moral responsibility is very difficult to answer, at least for me. Certainly those who perpetrated the atrocities are morally responsible but beyond that, I dunno.
Maybe you can help me understand?
Originally posted by Suzianne to KewpieCan you give one single example in the history of RHP where Kewpie has "denigrated" another poster? No you can't, not one. She is a principled, stoic and upstanding member of this community.
It won't be you and the others in this elitist list leading the revolt, it'll be that "other kind" you and the others continually denigrate.
You would possibly benefit from spending 20 minutes of quiet contemplation and reviewing your own posting history.
16 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeesterLooks like I'll see you at St. Alphonso's Pancake Breakfast.
Can you give one single example in the history of RHP where Kewpie has "denigrated" another poster? No you can't, not one. She is a principled, stoic and upstanding member of this community.
You would possibly benefit from spending 20 minutes of quiet contemplation and reviewing your own posting history.
>snerk<