General
15 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm just not seeing what this has to do with this thread.
Attempted genocide? Come now tweetie pie in what sense was the genocide merely attempted? Lets not kid ourselves what happened to the aboriginal Australians fits every description and definition of a genocide. Long ago? it wasn't that long ago mate! Well within two generations!
I am not entirely sure whether you should or do carry a retrospective ...[text shortened]... trocities are morally responsible but beyond that, I dunno.
Maybe you can help me understand?
Originally posted by divegeesterKindly peruse the very post I quoted.
Can you give one single example in the history of RHP where Kewpie has "denigrated" another poster? No you can't, not one. She is a principled, stoic and upstanding member of this community.
You would possibly benefit from spending 20 minutes of quiet contemplation and reviewing your own posting history.
Who are these "other kind"?
Same kind of denigration FMF does. He's just a little more overt through sheer volume.
Again, you're saying again that unprincipled = disagreeing with you and principled = agreeing with you. Frankly, I'd turn those two around.
My posting history is consistently defending those who this "elite" tries to trample with assumed impunity, as well as the diversity of opinion that gives these forums their vitality. You and this "elite" are the unprincipled ones who continually attack those who they disagree with, painting them as 'undesirables'. The problem is that in politics, and yes, this kind of audience manipulation IS political, the more you say something, the more people assume it's true. For example, people now think GB was bad for these forums, just because you people kept 'banging the drum' attacking him for years.
16 Sep 16
Originally posted by SuzianneSo you can't provide a single example of kewpie actually denigrating another poster can you?
Kindly peruse the very post I quoted.
Who are these "other kind"?
Same kind of denigration FMF does. He's just a little more overt through sheer volume.
Again, you're saying [b]again that unprincipled = disagreeing with you and principled = agreeing with you. Frankly, I'd turn those two around.[/b]
16 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeesterWait, what?
It was a brought-in working lunch at the RHP offices in Newbury, Berkshire. Russ expensed it.
"a brought-in working lunch at the RHP offices"
So are you actually an employee? Now the pieces start to fall together.
Or did you just "horn in" on a lunch meant for employees?