- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@badradger saidYeah; the winning goals in both 1966 and 1974 were illegal, and both championships should have been reversed.
The unaimed bullet allways hits the target.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 18
- Moves
- 20590
15 May 22
@shallow-blue said1966 4-2 winning goal 3 or 4
Yeah; the winning goals in both 1966 and 1974 were illegal, and both championships should have been reversed.
@badradger saidOf course the 2-1 was offside already and the 3-2 was not a goal...
1966 4-2 winning goal 3 or 4
15 May 22
@badradger saidAgreed, Those were the days before replay which would change the way the game was called. They also added a referee having 2 instead of just 1. Even then they both miss things and it has to go to the replay. If the replay is inconclusive they will go with the call on the ice.
1966 4-2 winning goal 3 or 4
-VR
15 May 22
@ponderable saidYup, They wouldn't have been allowed in this day and age with the replay being introduced.
Of course the 2-1 was offside already and the 3-2 was not a goal...
-VR
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
16 May 22
@very-rusty saidErm... neither England team has won anything since 1966... Even both Dutch teams have done (slightly) better since 1967.
I love how dedicated the English football/soccer fans are. Kind of like the Toronto Maple leaf fans only the English football/soccer team has won more Championships than the the Toronto Maple leaf's since 1967.
16 May 22
@shallow-blue saidYes Toronto beat Montreal In 1967 for the Stanley cup, look it up my friend.
Erm... neither England team has won anything since 1966... Even both Dutch teams have done (slightly) better since 1967.
-VR