04 Feb 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyDo you think that it's OK for people to discuss ways of losing weight on a message board like this?
Nobody in their right mind with minimal parental training in common courtesy ever sponsors a thinly veiled online conversation about obesity
and its deleterious effects on quality of life and self esteem. For your own sake and the sake of your own family, please wake up.
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat isn't my question. Regardless of what divegeester's motivation may have been, the words in the OP and thread title ~ regardless of who wrote them ~ in your view, can they legitimately be characterized as offensive in terms of what you believe is and isn't offensive?
I have really no idea what his motivation was.
Originally posted by FMFI am content to remain open minded to all possibilities.
That isn't my question. Regardless of what divegeester's motivation may have been, the words in the OP and thread title ~ regardless of who wrote them ~ in your view, can they legitimately be characterized as offensive in terms of what you believe is and isn't offensive?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyHave you alerted the moderators?
Nobody in their right mind with minimal parental training in common courtesy ever sponsors a thinly veiled online conversation about obesity
and its deleterious effects on quality of life and self esteem. For your own sake and the sake of your own family, please wake up.
Originally posted by FMFYes being mocked by a wit like divesgeester should be considered a privilege, like being insulted by Groucho Marx
But you said to divegeester: "I am sure they would welcome you making fun of them." So you in fact believe that that is what he was doing with his OP, right?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, as bafflingly wide of the mark as Grampy Bobby may be, at least he is making some semblance ~ or seeking to have the appearance ~ of taking a principled stance with all this, while you are not. You seem intent only on landing blows on divegeester's chin even if it makes you look equivocal and furtive. 😉
Whether he was or not who can say, i am content simply to remain open to the possibilities.
Originally posted by FMFPerhaps the real problem is the way Grampy Bobby was brought up when he was a child.
Is Grampy Bobby mistaken to be as offended as he seems to be? He has tried to drag divegeester's family into the discussion and the way divegeester was brought up when he was a child. Do you think this degree of condemnation is called for, in your view?
Is he the dutiful son of puritanical parents?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFYour concern is truly touching, let me reassure you that its a pleasure to know and be the recipient of divegeesters caustic diatribe, his imaginative use of terms like, 'bell end', 'STFU weasel boy' and other daintily measured and executed terms like 'fatso', are most edifying. One is clearly in the thralls of a great literary talent.
Well, as bafflingly wide of the mark as Grampy Bobby may be, at least he is making some semblance ~ or seeking to have the appearance ~ of taking a principled stance with all this, while you are not. You seem intent only on landing blows on divegeester's chin even if it makes you look equivocal and furtive. 😉