Originally posted by bluebabygirlI suppose this deserves a response. So we'll go clause-by-clause.
Yeh well royal chicken
My name is 'royalchicken'. Why do you assume this means the words 'royal chicken'? Couldn't it be 'royalchk en'? Similarly, I will call you bluebabygirl, not 'blue baby girl', because the former is what you wish to be called. You may also call me 'Mark', 'pimple-faced teenage Harry Potter reject', etc. Enough of that.
the nazi war criminals were as you put it ONLY "alleged war criminals
Exactly right. That any of them broke the law was alleged until evidence and reason (and politics) convicted some of them. It is a very imperfect scientific process.
until justice was served -the truth came out.
Essentially, your use of this example is either irrelevant or you are arguing the guilt of the Guantanomo Bay detainees based on the guilt of the certain Nazis, which is obviously ludicrous.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THOSE PEOPLE WERE DOING -HAVING A DAY AT THE BEACH IN IRAQ
The prisoners at Guantanomo Bay were not captured in Iraq. this information is available in any reputable news source.
WHEN THE MEAN OLE U.S. ARMY CAME ALONG AND NABBED THEM ,THEREBY DEPRIVING THEM OF THIER ONE AND ONLY VACATION????
Sarcasm works better when the arguer knows that her or his position is factually defensible.
YES THEY MAY BE ONLY QUOTE "ALLEGED" NOW BUT SAVE YOUR SYMPATHY FOR THE REAL VICTIMS OF THE TERRORISTS NOT THE FOR THE DAMN TERRORISTS !!!!
How does my concern for fair treatment of prisoners get in the way of my having sympathy for victims of a terrorist attack that is not necessarily even related to the prisoners?
--MAYBE I SHOULD REMIND YOU THERE WERE THOUSANDS DIED ON 9-11 .
They did indeed, and it was sad.
BEFORE YOU SAY IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT . I SAY SAME PEOPE, SAME RELIGION ,SAME HATE FOR USA AND SAME METHOD OF OPERATION -TERRORISM.
There is no evidence that the Iraqi government and people lent support to that attack. Religiously speaking, Muslims exhibit as much religious variety as Christians. Those responsible for the terrosist attacks were very different religiously from most Muslims, and certainly from the Iraqi government, which was secular. Again, get your facts straight. As for hate for the USA, why should that be grounds for violence? Don't non-americans have a right to their opinions (not necessarily action on them)? Or is bbarr right; are you simply a bigot?
Its obvious I have no sympathy for such religious fanatics or terrorists
Please read more critically. I evinced no sympathy, only a desire for reason and consistency.
SO SUE ME!!!
If you generally argue in this manner, I imagine suing you could be quite a profitable enterprise.
Originally posted by bluebabygirlYour views line up exactly with those who do the bombing - all enemies are the same and deserve what they get. How do you think people outside the US view your arrogance? Your country has lost much of the sympathy for the 9 11 bombing and is becoming isolated.
[bSAME PEOPE, SAME RELIGION ,SAME HATE FOR USA AND SAME METHOD OF OPERATION -TERRORISM.
You may think it doesn't matter - but the only way to beat terrorism is by co-operation. Bombs won't do it.
Originally posted by steerpikeMy opinion is that our true allies will remain true!! The rest do not count ...Most the world hates USA anyways because we are number 1 as of now.. We may be arrogant sometimes but then again ,its America policing the whole world. Its America thats leading the fight against terrorism..Its America that is carrying the load ... So any that seem to have lost sympathy for Our loss on 9-11 ,werent worth having anyways if they abandone for that reason.. NO MY VIEWS DO NOT LINE UP WITH THOSE THAT DID THE BOMBING BECAUSE I WOULD NEVER ADVOCATE WE GO AND BOMB INNOCENT CIVILIANS !!! This is my last post on this subject -BBG
Your views line up exactly with those who do the bombing - all enemies are the same and deserve what they get. How do you think people outside the US view your arrogance? Your country has lost much of the sympathy for the 9 11 bombing and is becoming isolated.
You may think it doesn't matter - but the only way to beat terrorism is by co-operation. Bombs won't do it.
Originally posted by bluebabygirlWHILE TRYING TO COMPREHEND YOUR POSTS I ACHIEVE AN ENORMOUS HEADACHE - DJC
My opinion is that our true allies will remain true!! The rest do not count ...Most the world hates USA anyways because we are number 1 as of now.. We may be arrogant sometimes but then again ,its America policing the whole world. Its America thats leading the fight against terrorism..Its America that is carrying the load ... So any that seem to have ...[text shortened]... NEVER ADVOCATE WE GO AND BOMB INNOCENT CIVILIANS !!! This is my last post on this subject -BBG
Originally posted by bluebabygirllook bbg i am an american. and i agree with why we are over there. but you truly do not have the slightest clue what you are talking about. i have tried to be nice... but everyone has a breaking point. you cant just fend off every political barb with "america number one" or what was it something about nazis... please be more informed when you open your mouth on such a sensitive subject. this post should have died anyways and you dragged it back up. you couldnt't just let things go. i love america and i know that there are people on this site who dont. that is fine let them have their opinion. you dont have to agree with it but you can at least have the composure and maturity not to spout off at the mouth and make the rest of the americans on this site look ignorant! how old are you anyways? you cant be more than 15 or something. there are even younger people on this site theat have shown more maturity.
My opinion is that our true allies will remain true!! The rest do not count ...Most the world hates USA anyways because we are number 1 as of now.. We may be arrogant sometimes but then again ,its America policing the whole world. Its America thats leading the fight against terrorism..Its America that is carrying the load ... So any that seem to have ...[text shortened]... NEVER ADVOCATE WE GO AND BOMB INNOCENT CIVILIANS !!! This is my last post on this subject -BBG
mike
Originally posted by belgianfreakYou fools want to compare A TERRORISTIC SNEAK ATTACK-9-11 WITH OUR WAR WITH IRAQ OR OUR WAR IN AFGAHNISTAN..WITH THE TALIBAN.. fIRST YOUR COMPARISON GIVES VALIDITY TO THE ACTIONS OF THE TERRORISTS . stupid!!! Yes civilians got killed during our war in Iraq but it wasnt intentional as was the 9-11 attack was -stupid.. 9-11 the targets was the civilians -stupid.. AND I SAY WHAT I THINK ,SO KISS OFF ON THAT . Freedom of speech ,ever hear of it .I am 16 but you fools act even more immature.. It makes me sick to hear morons defending a group of people whose method is terrorism . Go look up terrorism in case you do not comprehend ... Thier favorite method is to blow up civilians .. stupid .. It appears here there are more liberal fools sympathizing with the terrorists than with the victims . I POST NO MORE TO YOU FOOLS ABOUT IT WHATEVER . --KISS OFF ..
no, no innocent civilians were killed or injured or maimed or orphaned in the attack on Iraq, were they?
Originally posted by Black LungYou are right this not democracy
Is this democracy?
Personally, I think that even the bad guys have some rights. That’s part of what democracy’s supposed to be about, right? That everyone has fundamental human rights( yes even the muslim terrorists), that the government cannot be judge, jury and executioner. You’re supposed to be protected, no matter how ridiculous o ...[text shortened]... think that this is democracy. I think that this is fear and hysteria. I am worried about this.
Originally posted by bluebabygirlAnother reason to dispair of public education in the U.S.
You fools want to compare A TERRORISTIC SNEAK ATTACK-9-11 WITH OUR WAR WITH IRAQ OR OUR WAR IN AFGAHNISTAN..WITH THE TALIBAN.. fIRST YOUR COMPARISON GIVES VALIDITY TO THE ACTIONS OF THE TERRORISTS . stupid!!! Yes civilians got killed during our war in Iraq but it wasnt intentional as was the 9-11 attack was -stupid.. 9-11 the targets was the civilian ...[text shortened]... errorists than with the victims . I POST NO MORE TO YOU FOOLS ABOUT IT WHATEVER . --KISS OFF ..
Originally posted by missleadNo, I'm not saying that at all. It is because I believe in inalienable human rights that I've been arguing against the current treatment of prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay. Their rights to due process have been violated.
Are you saying you don't believe in human rights?
Originally posted by bbarrTry this then:I want our offenders tried by our courts of justice.Not yours.We will deal justice out.
No, I'm not saying that at all. It is because I believe in inalienable human rights that I've been arguing against the current treatment of prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay. Their rights to due process have been violated.